Literature DB >> 29366392

Long-term clinical outcome of two-stage revision surgery for infected hip arthroplasty using cement spacer: Culture negative versus culture positive.

Joon-Soon Kang1, Eun-Ho Shin1, Tae-Hoon Roh1, Yeop Na1, Kyoung Ho Moon1, Joo-Hyun Park1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a terrible complication after hip arthroplasty. Clinical feature of culture-negative PJI (CN-PJI) has not been well studied till now. In our study, we retrospectively analyzed long-term clinical results after two-stage revision arthroplasty using an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer for CN-PJI. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical features and prognosis of CN-PJI after hip arthroplasty and to compare these with those of culture-positive PJI (CP-PJI).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 15 CN-PJI cases and 70 CP-PJI cases following hip arthroplasty. The average follow-up period was 7.4 years (5-11.7 years). The demographics, laboratory findings, the time interval between antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer insertion and revision arthroplasty, and recurrence of infection were analyzed.
RESULTS: The CN-PJI group showed a significantly higher incidence of prior antibiotic use ( p = 0.004) and lower serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level ( p = 0.001) than the CP-PJI group. Normalized time interval of CRP level in CN-PJI was shorter than that of CP-PJI group. The mean interval time for two-stage exchange arthroplasty was also significantly lower ( p = 0.049) in the CN-PJI group than the CP-PJI group. There was no case of treatment failure or major complication in CN-PJI group.
CONCLUSION: The CN-PJI group after total hip arthroplasty could be treated successfully by two-stage exchange arthroplasty without any complications. Clinical course and prognosis of CN-PJI group was also better compared with that of CP-PJI group. Therefore, culture negativity of PJI cannot be always a poor prognostic factor for the treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; complication; culture negative; periprosthetic joint infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29366392     DOI: 10.1177/2309499017754095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  4 in total

1.  Culture-negative Peri-prosthetic Joint Infection after Total Hip Arthroplasty Treatment Protocol and Outcomes in Acute and Chronic Cases.

Authors:  Germán Garabano; Alan Maximiliano Gessara; Cesar Angel Pesciallo; Jorge Martinez; Hernán Del Sel
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-09

2.  Characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative prosthetic joint infections from the Prosthetic Joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand Observational (PIANO) cohort study.

Authors:  Sarah Browning; Laurens Manning; Sarah Metcalf; David L Paterson; James O Robinson; Benjamin Clark; Joshua S Davis
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2022-09-20

3.  Do Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infections Have a Worse Outcome Than Culture-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infections? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marie Reisener; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Clinical Outcomes of Culture-Negative and Culture-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Similar Success Rate, Different Incidence of Complications.

Authors:  Zhiyang Xu; Changyu Huang; Yiming Lin; Yongfa Chen; Xinyu Fang; Zida Huang; Chaofan Zhang; Zhenzhen Zhang; Wenming Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.