Marco Maselli1, Philip B Ward2, Erica Gobbi3, Attilio Carraro3. 1. 1 Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy, and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy. 2. 2 School of Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia. 3. 3 Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: University study is often accompanied by a decline in physical activity (PA) levels but can offer the opportunity to promote a lifelong active lifestyle. This review aims to summarize controlled trials of interventions promoting PA among university students, describing the quality of the evidence, effective strategies, and deficiencies in the interventions employed, to provide directions for future research and for practical implementations. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, Education Source, and SPORTDiscus. Study Inclusion Criteria: Randomized or nonrandomized controlled trial, describing an intervention to promote PA in university students, where PA was one of the outcomes and results were published in English. DATA EXTRACTION: Country, study design, participants' inclusion criteria, participation rate and characteristics, randomization, blinding, theoretical framework, intervention characteristics, participant retention rate and withdrawal reasons, measures employed, data analysis, PA results, and findings regarding PA correlates. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data were synthetized considering study characteristics, strategies used, and outcomes. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred eighty-five articles were identified. Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies reported an increase in PA levels. CONCLUSION: Physical Activity promotion interventions should address a range of behavioral determinants. Personalized approaches and PA sessions should be considered in future studies. The high risk of bias of many studies (mainly due to attrition and poor reporting) and missing information about intervention components limit the strength of conclusions about the most effective strategies and the evidence of effectiveness, highlighting the need for further high-quality studies.
OBJECTIVE: University study is often accompanied by a decline in physical activity (PA) levels but can offer the opportunity to promote a lifelong active lifestyle. This review aims to summarize controlled trials of interventions promoting PA among university students, describing the quality of the evidence, effective strategies, and deficiencies in the interventions employed, to provide directions for future research and for practical implementations. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, Education Source, and SPORTDiscus. Study Inclusion Criteria: Randomized or nonrandomized controlled trial, describing an intervention to promote PA in university students, where PA was one of the outcomes and results were published in English. DATA EXTRACTION: Country, study design, participants' inclusion criteria, participation rate and characteristics, randomization, blinding, theoretical framework, intervention characteristics, participant retention rate and withdrawal reasons, measures employed, data analysis, PA results, and findings regarding PA correlates. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data were synthetized considering study characteristics, strategies used, and outcomes. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred eighty-five articles were identified. Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies reported an increase in PA levels. CONCLUSION: Physical Activity promotion interventions should address a range of behavioral determinants. Personalized approaches and PA sessions should be considered in future studies. The high risk of bias of many studies (mainly due to attrition and poor reporting) and missing information about intervention components limit the strength of conclusions about the most effective strategies and the evidence of effectiveness, highlighting the need for further high-quality studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
college; health education; health promotion; physical activity; university
Authors: Dennis Edelmann; Daniel Pfirrmann; Sebastian Heller; Pavel Dietz; Jennifer L Reichel; Antonia M Werner; Markus Schäfer; Ana N Tibubos; Nicole Deci; Stephan Letzel; Perikles Simon; Kristin Kalo Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-06-16
Authors: Caitlin P Bailey; Shanti Sharma; Christina D Economos; Erin Hennessy; Caitlin Simon; Daniel P Hatfield Journal: Obes Sci Pract Date: 2020-09-23
Authors: Philip Bachert; Hagen Wäsche; Felix Albrecht; Claudia Hildebrand; Alexa Maria Kunz; Alexander Woll Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-06-30
Authors: Cristina Corella; Javier Zaragoza; José Antonio Julián; Víctor Hugo Rodríguez-Ontiveros; Carlos Tomás Medrano; Inmaculada Plaza; Alberto Abarca-Sos Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Pavel Dietz; Jennifer L Reichel; Dennis Edelmann; Antonia M Werner; Ana Nanette Tibubos; Markus Schäfer; Perikles Simon; Stephan Letzel; Daniel Pfirrmann Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2020-04-28