| Literature DB >> 29364856 |
Quansheng Jiang1,2, Yehu Shen3,4, Hua Li5,6, Fengyu Xu7.
Abstract
Feature recognition and fault diagnosis plays an important role in equipment safety and stable operation of rotating machinery. In order to cope with the complexity problem of the vibration signal of rotating machinery, a feature fusion model based on information entropy and probabilistic neural network is proposed in this paper. The new method first uses information entropy theory to extract three kinds of characteristics entropy in vibration signals, namely, singular spectrum entropy, power spectrum entropy, and approximate entropy. Then the feature fusion model is constructed to classify and diagnose the fault signals. The proposed approach can combine comprehensive information from different aspects and is more sensitive to the fault features. The experimental results on simulated fault signals verified better performances of our proposed approach. In real two-span rotor data, the fault detection accuracy of the new method is more than 10% higher compared with the methods using three kinds of information entropy separately. The new approach is proved to be an effective fault recognition method for rotating machinery.Entities:
Keywords: fault recognition; feature extraction; information entropy; probabilistic neural network; rotary machinery
Year: 2018 PMID: 29364856 PMCID: PMC5855057 DOI: 10.3390/s18020337
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Structure diagram of the PNN.
Figure 2The structure of the feature fusion model based on information entropy and the PNN.
Results of four fault identification methods on simulated data.
| Methods | Singular Spectrum Entropy | Power Spectrum Entropy | Approximate Entropy | Feature Fusion Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fault identification accuracy | 91.7% | 93.5% | 68.3% | 95.2% |
Figure 3The working principle diagram of the rotor test rig.
Figure 4Singular spectrum entropy of a single-span rotor under the unbalance fault.
Figure 5Singular spectrum entropy of a single-span rotor under the rubbing fault.
Figure 6Power spectrum entropy of a single-span rotor under the unbalance fault.
Figure 7Power spectrum entropy of a single-span rotor under the rubbing fault.
Figure 8Approximate entropy of a single-span rotor under the unbalance fault.
Figure 9Approximate entropy of a single-span rotor under the rubbing fault.
Results of four fault identification methods on real data of a single-span rotor.
| Rotation Speed | Singular Spectrum Entropy | Power Spectrum Entropy | Approximate Entropy | Feature Fusion Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1200 rpm | 71.2% | 78.9% | 78.9% | 83.1% |
| 2400 rpm | 81.6% | 92.2% | 86.9% | 94.8% |
| 3600 rpm | 93.9% | 64.3% | 96.2% | 98.7% |
Results of four fault identification methods on real data of two-span rotors.
| Rotation Speed | Singular Spectrum Entropy | Power Spectrum Entropy | Approximate Entropy | Feature Fusion Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1000 rpm | 67.74% | 64.51% | 66.13% | 80.64% |
| 3000 rpm | 73.69% | 81.03% | 79.52% | 92.17% |
| 5000 rpm | 82.85% | 75.97% | 85.21% | 95.38% |