| Literature DB >> 29364837 |
Mario Dolera1, Luca Malfassi2, Nancy Carrara3, Sara Finesso4, Silvia Marcarini5, Giovanni Mazza6, Simone Pavesi7, Massimo Sala8, Gaetano Urso9.
Abstract
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is a modern technique, widely used in human radiotherapy, which allows a high dose to be delivered to tumor volumes and low doses to the surrounding organs at risk (OAR). Veterinary clinics takes advantage of this feature due to the small target volumes and distances between the target and the OAR. Sparing the OAR permits dose escalation, and hypofractionation regimens reduce the number of treatment sessions with a simpler manageability in the veterinary field. Multimodal volumes definition is mandatory for the small volumes involved and a positioning device precisely reproducible with a setup confirmation is needed before each session for avoiding missing the target. Additionally, the elaborate treatment plan must pursue hard constraints and objectives, and its feasibility must be evaluated with a per patient quality control. The aim of this work is to report results with regard to brain meningiomas and gliomas, trigeminal nerve tumors, brachial plexus tumors, adrenal tumors with vascular invasion and rabbit thymomas, in comparison with literature to determine if VMAT is a safe and viable alternative to surgery or chemotherapy alone, or as an adjuvant therapy in pets.Entities:
Keywords: VMAT; adrenal tumors; brachial plexus tumors; gliomas; meningiomas; rabbit thymomas; trigeminal nerve tumors
Year: 2018 PMID: 29364837 PMCID: PMC5836062 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10020030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Outcome according to the Combined Response Evaluation System (CRES): the categorical attribution of the patients during the 24-months follow-up.
| 2 Months | 4 Months | 6 Months | 12 Months | 18 Months | 24 Months | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Response | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Partial Response | 3 | 12 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 14 |
| Stable Disease | 34 | 23 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 10 |
| Progressive Disease | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of alive patients | 39 | 37 | 36 | 33 | 32 | 29 |
Survival in the RT and RT + TMZ arms.
| One Year | Two Years | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival | Disease-Specific Survival | Progression-Free Survival | Overall Survival | Disease-Specific Survival | Progression-Free Survival | |
| RT | 50% | 81.8% | 72.7% | 40.9% | 72.7% | 72.7% |
| RT + TMZ | 65% | 90% | 90% | 40% | 90% | 70% |
RT, radiation therapy; TMZ, temozolomide.
Data regarding the Kaplan Meier analysis with indicated the cause of death or the type of censoring and the type of response.
| Dog | Censored/Cause of Death | Survival at the End of the Study (days) | Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Censor | 1187 | SD |
| #2 | Censor | 754 | PR |
| #3 | Euthanasia | 523 | PR-PD |
| #4 | Censor | 389 | CR |
| #5 | Gastric dilatation volvulus | 952 | SD |
| #6 | Hemorrhagic gastroenteritis | 649 | PR |
| #7 | Car Accident | 313 | PR |
Data for the Kaplan Meier analysis. The only censored data is for the 10th patient.
| Dog | Overall Survival (days) | Progression Free Survival (days) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 179 | 98 |
| 2 | 265 | 141 |
| 3 | 345 | 201 |
| 4 | 377 | 227 |
| 5 | 381 | 233 |
| 6 | 397 | 239 |
| 7 | 418 | 282 |
| 8 | 423 | 288 |
| 9 | 446 | 295 |
| 10 | 482 | 392 |
Classification of the selected dogs with volume reduction and survical data.
| Dog | Classification | Volume Reduction (%) | Survival (days) | Censored/Cause of Death |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NSAT | 20 | 337 | Pulmonary tromboembolism |
| 2 | CSAT | 35.48 | 1030 | Intracranial neoplasia |
| 3 | NSAT | 35.58 | 890 | Cerebral stroke |
| 4 | NSAT | 24.53 | 1034 | Analsac adenocarcinoma |
| 5 | CSAT | 34.85 | 1585 | Cardiac and renal failure |
| 6 | NSAT | 24 | 912 | Cardiac failure |
| 7 | NSAT | 45.19 | 1632 | Censored (alive) |
| 8 | CSAT | 30.95 | 1592 | Censored (alive) |
| 9 | NSAT | 24.78 | 489 | Vehicular accident |
Target volume reductions during treatment as determined by CT contoured volumes.
| Pre-Treatment Volume (cc) | Treatment Day 5 Volume (cc) | Treatment Day 9 Volume (cc) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GTV | 19 ± 4 | 9 ± 3 | 6 ± 2 |
| PTV | 24 ± 7 | 13 ± 6 | 10 ± 4 |
GTV, Gross Tumor Volume; PTV, Planning Target Volume; CT, computed tomography.
Combined Response Evaluation System (CRES): MRI volumetric assessment implemented with clinical evaluation and the need of corticosteroid administration.
| MRI Volumetric Assessment | Corticosteroids Requirement | Clinical Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| disappearance of all enhancing tumor | patient not receiving steroids | stable or improved clinical status | |
| ≥30% decrease in tumor volume | stable or decreased steroids dose | stable or improved clinical status | |
| ≤30% decrease or | stable or decreased steroids dose | stable or improved clinical status | |
| ≥20% increase in tumor volume | stable or increased steroids dose | clinical deterioration |
MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging.