Literature DB >> 29364699

The Strength of Transosseous Medial Meniscal Root Repair Using a Simple Suture Technique Is Dependent on Suture Material and Position.

James R Robinson1,2, Evelyn G Frank3, Alan J Hunter3, Paul J Jermin1,4, Harinderjit S Gill3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A simple suture technique in transosseous meniscal root repair can provide equivalent resistance to cyclic load and is less technically demanding to perform compared with more complex suture configurations, yet maximum yield loads are lower. Various suture materials have been investigated for repair, but it is currently not clear which material is optimal in terms of repair strength. Meniscal root anatomy is also complex; consisting of the ligamentous mid-substance (root ligament), the transition zone between the meniscal body and root ligament; the relationship between suture location and maximum failure load has not been investigated in a simulated surgical repair. HYPOTHESES: (A) Using a knottable, 2-mm-wide, ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) braided tape for transosseous meniscal root repair with a simple suture technique will give rise to a higher maximum failure load than a repair made using No. 2 UHMWPE standard suture material for simple suture repair. (B) Suture position is an important factor in determining the maximum failure load. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: In part A, the posterior root attachment of the medial meniscus was divided in 19 porcine knees. The tibias were potted, and repair of the medial meniscus posterior root was performed. A suture-passing device was used to place 2 simple sutures into the posterior root of the medial meniscus during a repair procedure that closely replicated single-tunnel, transosseous surgical repair commonly used in clinical practice. Ten tibias were randomized to repair with No. 2 suture (Suture group) and 9 tibias to repair with 2-mm-wide knottable braided tape (Tape group). The repair strength was assessed by maximum failure load measured by use of a materials testing machine. Micro-computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained to assess suture positions within the meniscus. The wide range of maximum failure load appeared related to suture position. In part B, 10 additional porcine knees were prepared. Five knees were randomized to the Suture group and 5 to the Tape group. All repairs were standardized for location, and the repair was placed in the body of the meniscus. A custom image registration routine was created to coregister all 29 menisci, which allowed the distribution of maximum failure load versus repair location to be visualized with a heat map.
RESULTS: In part A, higher maximum failure load was found for the Tape group (mean, 86.7 N; 95% CI, 63.9-109.6 N) compared with the Suture group (mean, 57.2 N; 95% CI, 30.5-83.9 N). The 3D micro-CT analysis of suture position showed that the mean maximum failure load for repairs placed in the meniscus body (mean, 104 N; 95% CI, 81.2-128.0 N) was higher than for those placed in the root ligament (mean, 35.1 N; 95% CI, 15.7-54.5 N). In part B, the mean maximum failure load was significantly greater for the Tape group, 298.5 N ( P = .016, Mann-Whitney U; 95% CI, 183.9-413.1 N), compared with that for the Suture group, 146.8 N (95% CI, 82.4-211.6 N). Visualization with the heat map revealed that small variations in repair location on the meniscus were associated with large differences in maximum failure load; moving the repair entry point by 3 mm could reduce the failure load by 50%.
CONCLUSION: The use of 2-mm braided tape provided higher maximum failure load than the use of a No. 2 suture. The position of the repair in the meniscus was also a highly significant factor in the properties of the constructs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results provide insight into material and location for optimal repair strength.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanical testing; meniscal root repair; repair location; suture material

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29364699     DOI: 10.1177/0363546517749807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  7 in total

1.  Degradation Behavior In Vitro of Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs)/Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) Composite Suture.

Authors:  Shuqiang Liu; Gaihong Wu; Xiaogang Chen; Xiaofang Zhang; Juanjuan Yu; Mingfang Liu; Yao Zhang; Peng Wang
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.329

2.  Different Suture Materials for Arthroscopic Transtibial Pull-out Repair of Medial Meniscal Posterior Root Tears: A Human Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Gilberto Y Nakama; Zachary S Aman; Hunter W Storaci; Alexander S Kuczmarski; Joseph J Krob; Marc J Strauss
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-09-30

3.  Knotless Anchor Fixation for Transosseous Meniscal Root Repair Using Suture Tape Is Inferior Compared With Button or Screw Fixation: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  James R Robinson; Bruno Agostinho Hernandez; Clare Taylor; Harinderjit S Gill
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-04-20

4.  Quantifying the differential functional behavior between the medial and lateral meniscus after posterior meniscus root tears.

Authors:  Brian E Walczak; Kyle Miller; Michael A Behun; Lisa Sienkiewicz; Heather Hartwig Stokes; Ron McCabe; Geoffrey S Baer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Arthroscopic Transtibial Pull-Out Repair for Meniscal Posterior Root Tear: The Slip Knot Technique.

Authors:  Hsin-Ya Chen; Kuan-Yu Lin
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-01-20

6.  Clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear.

Authors:  Takaaki Hiranaka; Takayuki Furumatsu; Yuki Okazaki; Keisuke Kintaka; Yusuke Kamatsuki; Ximing Zhang; Haowei Xue; Masanori Hamada; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-10-08

7.  An Arthroscopic-Assisted Radial Meniscal Tear Repair Using Reinforced Suture Tape Rebars and Suture Tapes.

Authors:  Kevin Feltz; Aaron Brown; Stefan Hanish; Yudong Gan; Richard Ma
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-04-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.