| Literature DB >> 29364365 |
Lilian Rigo1, Raíssa Rigo Garbin2, José Lucas Sani de Alcântara Rodrigues3, Laerte Ribeiro Menezes-Júnior4, Luiz Renato Paranhos5, Cristiane Barelli2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To verify the profile of elderly followed up by Family Health Strategy teams and the influence of self-reported chronic diseases on demographic variables, describing self-perception and satisfaction with quality of health.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29364365 PMCID: PMC5875155 DOI: 10.1590/S1679-45082017AO3972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Einstein (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1679-4508
Demographic variables of the elderly
| Demographic variables | n (%) (n=301) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age range, years | ||
| 60-70 | 167 (55.5) | |
| 71-80 | 103 (34.2) | |
| 81-90 | 30 (10.0) | |
| Over 91 | 1 (0.33) | |
| Ethnic group | ||
| White | 192 (64.8) | |
| Asian | 2 (0.7) | |
| Indigenous | 3 (1.0) | |
| Mulatto | 80 (26.6) | |
| Black | 19 (6.3) | |
| Losses | 2 (0.66) | |
| Marital status | ||
| Divorced | 16 (5.3) | |
| Separated | 21 (7.0) | |
| Widow(ed) | 80 (26.6) | |
| Married | 154 (51.2) | |
| Cohabiting | 12 (4.0) | |
| Single | 3 (1.0) | |
| Losses | 15 (4.9) | |
| Religion | ||
| Catholic | 247 (82.1) | |
| Protestant | 3 (1.0) | |
| Evangelical | 41 (13.6) | |
| Spiritist | 2 (0.7) | |
| Budist | 1 (0.3) | |
| Other | 4(1.3) | |
| None | 3 (1.0) | |
| Residents per household | ||
| 1 | 44 (14.6) | |
| 2 | 119 (39.5) | |
| 3 | 64 (21.3) | |
| 4 | 45 (15.0) | |
| 5 | 10 (3.3) | |
| 6 | 19 (6.3) | |
| Type of house | ||
| Own | 280 (93.0) | |
| Rented | 15(5.0) | |
| Donated or borrowed | 6 (2.0) | |
| Building material of the house | ||
| Wood | 76 (25.2) | |
| Brick/masonry | 156 (51.8) | |
| Mixed | 69 (22.9) | |
| Water supplied by the sewage company | ||
| Yes | 298 (99.0) | |
| No | 3 (1.0) | |
| Electricity | ||
| Yes | 301(100) | |
| No | 0 (0) | |
| Living alone | ||
| Yes | 62 (20.6) | |
| No | 236 (78.4) | |
| Did not answer | 2 (0.7) | |
| Losses | 1 (0.3) | |
| Receiving help from another | ||
| Yes | 201 (66.8) | |
| No | 79 (26.2) | |
| Losses | 21 (7) | |
| Help from someone living in the same house | ||
| Yes | 174 (57.8) | |
| No | 88 (29.2) | |
| Did not answer | 12 (4.0) | |
| Losses | 27 (9) | |
| Help from someone not living in the same house | ||
| Yes | 80 (26.6) | |
| No | 172 (57.1) | |
| Losses | 47 (10.6) | |
| Help from an institution over the last year | ||
| Yes | 17(5.6) | |
| No | 241 (80) | |
| Did not answer | 20 (92.4) | |
| Losses | 23(7.6) | |
Variables of self-perception about quality and satisfaction with their health
| Variable | n (%) (n=301) | |
|---|---|---|
| Current health status | ||
| Very good | 12 (4.0) | |
| Good | 121 (40.2) | |
| Regular | 143 (47.5) | |
| Poor | 22(7.3) | |
| Very poor | 3(1.0) | |
| How do you consider your current health status | ||
| Good | 133 (44.2) | |
| Regular | 143 (47.5) | |
| Poor | 25 (8.3) | |
| One year ago, your health was | ||
| Better | 49 (16.3) | |
| The same | 191 (63.5) | |
| Worse | 61 (20.0) | |
| Comparing your health with other people of the same age, yours is | ||
| Better | 123 (40.9) | |
| The same | 134 (44.5) | |
| Worse | 44 (14.6) | |
| Degree of satisfaction with your health - playful scale | ||
| 3 sad faces | 1 (0.3) | |
| 2 sad faces | 4(1.3) | |
| 1 sad face | 10 (3.3) | |
| 1 indifferent face | 68 (22.6) | |
| 1 happy face | 69 (22.9) | |
| 2 happy faces | 68 (22.6) | |
| 3 happy faces | 81 (26.9) | |
| Playful scale classification | ||
| Happy | 218 (72.4) | |
| Unhappy | 83 (27.6) | |
| References to chronic diseases | ||
| Yes | 273 (90.7) | |
| No | 24 (8.0) | |
| Quantity of chronic diseases reported | ||
| 0 | 125 (41.5) | |
| 1 | 85 (28.2) | |
| 2 | 51 (16.9) | |
| 3 | 31 (10.3) | |
| 4 | 5 (1.7) | |
| 5 | 4(1.3) | |
| Chronic use of medication | ||
| Yes | 212 (70.4) | |
| No | 89 (29.5) | |
Inferential analysis of the independent variables and presence of reported chronic diseases
| Variables | Reported chronic diseases | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Total | p value | ||
| Age range | >0.005 | ||||
| 60-70 | 17 (70.8) | 148 (54.2) | 165 (62.5) | ||
| Over 70 | 7 (29.1) | 129 (45.7) | 136 (37.4) | ||
| Sex | >0.005 | ||||
| Male | 13 (54.1) | 116 (42.4) | 129(43.4 | ||
| Female | 11 (45.8) | 161 (57.6) | 172 (56.6) | ||
| ESF | >0.005 | ||||
| Adolfo Groth | 10(41.6) | 138 (50.6) | 148 (49.8) | ||
| Planaltina | 14 (58.3) | 139 (49.4) | 153 (51.1) | ||
| Chronic use of medication |
| ||||
| Yes | 0 | 212 (86.0) | 212 (79.1) | ||
| No | 24 (100.0) | 65 (13.0) | 89 (20.9) | ||
| Ethnicity | 0.470 | ||||
| White | 15(62.5) | 181 (65.3) | 196 (65.1) | ||
| Black, “Negro”, Indigenous, and Asian | 9 (37.5) | 96 (34.7) | 105 (34.9) | ||
| Marital status | |||||
| Married | 11 (45.8) | 143(51.6) | 154 (51.2) | 0.370 | |
| Separated, divorced, widow (ed) and single | 13 (54.2) | 134 (48.4) | 147 (48.8) | ||
| Religion | 0.240 | ||||
| Catholic | 18 (75.0) | 229 (82.7) | 247 (82.1) | ||
| Protestant, Evangelical, Spiritist, Budist | 6 (25.0) | 48 (17.3) | 54 (17.9) | ||
| Residents per household | 0.371 | ||||
| 1-3 | 17 (70.8) | 210 (75.8) | 227 (75.4) | ||
| 4-6 | 7 (29.2) | 67(21.2) | 74 (24.6) | ||
| Type of house | 0.515 | ||||
| Own | 22(91.7) | 258 (93.1) | 280 (93.0) | ||
| Rented, donated, or borrowed | 2 (8.3) | 19 (6.9) | 21 (7.0) | ||
| Live alone | 0.241 | ||||
| Yes | 7 (29.2) | 58 (20.9) | 65(21.6) | ||
| No | 219 (79.1) | 17 (70.8) | 236 (78.4) | ||
| Receives help from someone | 0.398 | ||||
| Yes | 15(62.5) | 186 (67.1) | 201 (66.8) | ||
| No | 9 (37.5) | 91 (33.9) | 100 (33.2) | ||
p<0.05.
Statistically significant relation.
ESF: Family Health Strategy program.