| Literature DB >> 29363645 |
Xiao-Dong Lin1, Xing-Shi Chen2, Ce Chen1, Li-Jun Zhang1, Zuo-Liang Xie1, Zi-Ye Huang1, Guang-Dong Chen1, Wan-Tao Ding1, Zhi-Guang Lin2, Ming-Dao Zhang2, Chong Chen2, Rong-Qin Wu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and event-related potentials (ERPs) are a noninvasive technique that widely used in neurophysiological field. Although rTMS has shown clinical utility for a number of neurological conditions, Recently,there was little understanding of the the efficacy of rTMS on Schizophrenia(SZ) and the change of ERP between before and after rTMS treatment. The objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics of N400, mismatch negativity (MMN), and P300 before and after treatment with rTMS in SZ.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29363645 PMCID: PMC5798051 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.223846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) ISSN: 0366-6999 Impact factor: 2.628
The change of N400 in patients before and after treatment with 85 real rTMS and 42 ShrTMS stimulation (mean ± SD)
| Items | Category | Wave | rTMS | ShrTMS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | |||||
| Same phonic, different shape and meaning | Congruent | Latency (ms) | 388.0 ± 43.0 | 385.0 ± 37.0 | 386.0 ± 38.0 | 390 ± 41 | 0.93 | >0.05 |
| Amplitude (µV) | 5.9 ± 4.5 | 7.6 ± 3.9*,† | 5.8 ± 3.7 | 6.2 ± 4.3 | 2.71 | <0.05 | ||
| Incongruent | Latency (ms) | 424.0 ± 33.0 | 426.0 ± 29.0 | 427.0 ± 31.0 | 425.0 ± 24.0 | 1.03 | >0.05 | |
| Amplitude (µV) | 5.5 ± 3.7 | 5.6 ± 3.9 | 5.6 ± 4.1 | 5.4 ± 3.8 | 0.91 | >0.05 | ||
| Different phonic, shape and meaning | Congruent | Latency (ms) | 425.0 ± 52.0 | 419.0 ± 49.0 | 422.0 ± 48.0 | 427.0 ± 46.0 | 1.39 | >0.05 |
| Amplitude (µV) | 2.9 ± 1.0 | 3.2 ± 2.1 | 3.0 ± 1.8 | 2.8 ± 1.4 | 1.64 | >0.05 | ||
| Incongruent | Latency (ms) | 477.0 ± 41.0 | 479.0 ± 43.0 | 476.0 ± 38.0 | 481.0 ± 44.0 | 1.11 | >0.05 | |
| Amplitude (µV) | 5.2 ± 3.3 | 6.9 ± 3.3*,† | 5.3 ± 3.4 | 5.1 ± 3.6 | 2.61 | <0.05 | ||
Compared with before treatment with real rTMS in the patient, *P<0.05; Compared to before and after treatment either with real rTMS or ShrTMS, †P<0.05. rTMS: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; ShrTMS: Sham rTMS; SD: Standard deviation.
Variation of PANSS and SANS scale before and after treatment in 85 patient group (mean ± SD)
| Items | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANSS P score | 15.0 ± 4.8 | 14.3 ± 5.1 | 1.10 | >0.05 |
| PANSS N score | 24.1 ± 4.5 | 17.9 ± 6.1* | 5.79 | <0.01 |
| PANSS G score | 30.4 ± 5.2 | 27.5 ± 4.7* | 3.17 | <0.05 |
| PANSS T score | 69.6 ± 16.3 | 59.5 ± 17.8* | 4.29 | <0.01 |
| SANS score | 49.5 ± 13.4 | 28.9 ± 6.8* | 9.41 | <0.01 |
Compared to before treatment *P<0.05. PANSS: Positive and Negative Syndromes Scale; SANS: Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms; SD: Standard deviation.
Comparison of the latency and amplitude of N400 among 85 SZs before and after treatment and 76 NCs (mean ± SD)
| Items | Category | Wave | NC | SZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | ||||||
| Same phonic, different shape and meaning | Congruent | Latency (ms) | 379.0 ± 39.0 | 388.0 ± 43.0‡ | 385.0 ± 37.0‡ | 0.93 | >0.05 |
| Amplitude (µV) | 6.3 ± 4.0 | 5.9 ± 4.5 | 7.6 ± 3.9* | 2.71 | <0.05 | ||
| Incongruent | Latency (ms) | 428.0 ± 30.0 | 424.0 ± 33.0 | 426.0 ± 29.0 | 1.03 | >0.05 | |
| Amplitude (µV) | 5.2 ± 3.9 | 5.5 ± 3.7 | 5.6 ± 3.9 | 0.91 | >0.05 | ||
| Different phonic, shape and meaning | Congruent | Latency (ms) | 413.0 ± 48.0 | 425.0 ± 52.0†,§ | 419.0 ± 49.0§ | 1.39 | <0.05 |
| Amplitude (µV) | 5.2 ± 4.0 | 2.9 ± 1.0*,‡ | 3.2 ± 2.1‡ | 1.64 | <0.05 | ||
| Incongruent | Latency (ms) | 479.0 ± 43.0 | 477.0 ± 41.0 | 479.0 ± 43.0 | 1.11 | >0.05 | |
| Amplitude (µV) | 7.9 ± 3.2 | 5.2 ± 3.3*,‡ | 6.9 ± 3.3* | 2.61 | <0.05 | ||
Compared to the NC group, ‡P < 0.05, §P < 0.01; Compared between before and after treatment with rTMS in SZ group,*P < 0.05, †P < 0.01. NCs: Normal controls; SZ: Schizophrenia; SD: Standard deviation.
Comparison of P300 and MMN indexes among 85 SZs before and after treatment and 76 NCs (mean ± SD)
| Items | Wave | NC | SZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | |||||
| P300-P3 | Target latency (ms) | 331.0 ± 17.0 | 338.0 ± 16.0 | 343.0 ± 17.0 | 1.64 | >0.05 |
| Target amplitude (µV) | 7.6 ± 4.8 | 5.3 ± 2.1*,‡ | 7.3 ± 1.9 | 3.31 | <0.05 | |
| MMN | Latency (ms) | 209.0 ± 30.0 | 223.0 ± 36.0§ | 229.0 ± 39.0§ | 1.07 | >0.05 |
| Amplitude (µV) | 8.3 ± 3.4 | 5.5 ± 3.1‡ | 8.1 ± 3.6† | 4.01 | <0.05 | |
Compared to the NC group, ‡P < 0.05, §P < 0.01; Compared between before and after treatment with rTMS in SZ group,*P < 0.05, †P < 0.01. NCs: Normal controls; SZ: Schizophrenia; SD: Standard deviation; MMN: Mismatch negativity.