Literature DB >> 29363510

Performance characteristics of rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody assays may impact ACR/EULAR classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

Lieve Van Hoovels1, Julie Jacobs1, Bert Vander Cruyssen2, Stefanie Van den Bremt1, Patrick Verschueren3, Xavier Bossuyt4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA) are integrated in the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the technical and diagnostic performance of different RF and ACPA assays and to evaluate whether differences in performance impact RA classification.
METHODS: Samples from 594 consecutive patients who for the first time consulted a rheumatologist (44 of whom were diagnosed with RA) and 26 extra newly diagnosed patients with RA were analysed with six different RF assays (Menarini, Thermo Fisher, Inova, Roche, Abbott, Euroimmun) and seven different ACPA assays (Menarini, Thermo Fisher, Inova, Roche, Abbott, Euro Diagnostica, Euroimmun).
RESULTS: We found differences in analytical performance between assays. There was poor numerical agreement between the different RF and ACPA assays. For all assays, the likelihood ratio for RA increased with increasing antibody levels. The areas under the curve of receiver operating characteristic analysis of the RF (range 0.676-0.709) and ACPA assays (range 0.672-0.769) only differed between some ACPA assays. Nevertheless, using the cut-off proposed by the manufacturer, there was a large variation in sensitivity and specificity between assays (mainly for RF). Consequently, depending on the assay used, a subgroup of patients (13% for RF, 1% for ACPA and 9% for RF/ACPA) might or might not be classified as RA according to the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria.
CONCLUSION: Due to poor harmonisation of RF and ACPA assays and of test result interpretation, RA classification according to 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria may vary when different assays are used. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anti-CCP; rheumatoid arthritis; rheumatoid factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29363510     DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  12 in total

1.  Impact of Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Antibody Level on Progression to Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinically Tested Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Antibody-Positive Patients Without Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Julia A Ford; Xinyi Liu; Allison A Marshall; Alessandra Zaccardelli; Maria G Prado; Charlene Wiyarand; Bing Lu; Elizabeth W Karlson; Peter H Schur; Kevin D Deane; Jeffrey A Sparks
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Bone erosions by MRI in first-degree relatives of patients with RA: an exploratory study.

Authors:  David Vega-Morales; María Del Carmen Larios-Forte; Lorena Pérez-Barbosa; Jorge Antonio Esquivel-Valerio; Mario Alberto Garza-Elizondo; Cassandra Michelle Skinner-Taylor; Brenda Roxana Vázquez-Fuentes; Diana Elsa Flores-Alvarado; Miguel Ángel Villarreal-Alarcón; Iván de Jesús Hernández-Galarza; Luis Iván Lozano-Plata; Martha Mariana Castañeda-Martínez; Diana Daniela Castañeda-Martínez; Pablo Herrera-Sandate; Jesus Alberto Cardenas-de la Garza; Dionicio Ángel Galarza-Delgado
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Microbiota-assisted therapy for systemic inflammatory arthritis: advances and mechanistic insights.

Authors:  Bowen Li; Bo Yang; Xiaoming Liu; Jianxin Zhao; R Paul Ross; Catherine Stanton; Hao Zhang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 9.207

Review 4.  The Role of Autoantibody Testing in Modern Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Cristiane Kayser; Lívia Almeida Dutra; Edgard Torres Dos Reis-Neto; Charlles Heldan de Moura Castro; Marvin J Fritzler; Luis Eduardo C Andrade
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 10.817

Review 5.  Autoantibodies in Rheumatoid Arthritis - Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives.

Authors:  Johan Rönnelid; Carl Turesson; Alf Kastbom
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  The perspective on standardisation and harmonisation: the viewpoint of the EASI president.

Authors:  Jan Damoiseaux
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2020-02-06

7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease related to anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kamiya; Ogee Mer Panlaqui
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Impact of autoimmune serology test results on RA classification and diagnosis.

Authors:  Lieve Van Hoovels; Paul Studenic; Daniela Sieghart; Günter Steiner; Xavier Bossuyt; Johan Rönnelid
Journal:  J Transl Autoimmun       Date:  2022-01-06

9.  Serum CA72-4 is specifically elevated in gout patients and predicts flares.

Authors:  Xueshan Bai; Mingshu Sun; Yuwei He; Ruhua Liu; Lingling Cui; Can Wang; Fang Wan; Ming Wang; Xinde Li; Hailong Li; Xinjiang Wu; Changgui Li
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 7.580

10.  Autoantibodies in the criteria of autoimmune diseases: is it sufficient to know that the test is positive?

Authors:  Jan Damoiseaux
Journal:  J Transl Autoimmun       Date:  2022-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.