Literature DB >> 29363371

The impact of cerclage in twin pregnancies on preterm birth rate before 32 weeks.

Michelle N Han1, Betsy E O'Donnell2, Melanie M Maykin2, Juan M Gonzalez2, Khalil Tabsh1, Stephanie L Gaw2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether cerclage in twins reduces the rate of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks when compared to expectant management.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies with the following indications for cerclage from two institutions: history of prior preterm birth, ultrasound-identified short cervix ≤2.5 cm, and cervical dilation ≥1.0 cm. The "cerclage" cohort received a cerclage from a single provider at a single institution from 2003-2016. The "no cerclage" group included all patients with similar indications that were expectantly managed from 2010-2015, at a second institution where cerclages are routinely not performed in twin pregnancies. The primary outcome was the rate of spontaneous preterm birth at <32 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the rates of spontaneous and overall (including medically indicated) preterm births at <32 weeks, < 34 weeks, and <36 weeks, chorioamnionitis, birth weight, and neonatal mortality within 30 days of life. We also performed a planned subgroup analysis stratified by cerclage indication.
RESULTS: In all, 135 women were included in two cohorts: cerclage (n = 96) or no cerclage (n = 39). The rates of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks were 10.4% (n = 10) with cerclage versus 28.2% (n = 11) without cerclage (OR 0.23, CI 0.08-0.70, p = .017). After adjusting for cerclage indication, clinical history, age, chorionicity, insurance type, race, BMI, in-vitro fertilization, and multifetal reduction, there remained a significant reduction in the cerclage group of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.24, CI 0.06-0.90, p = .035), spontaneous preterm birth <36 weeks (aOR 0.34, CI 0.04-0.81, p = .013) as well as in overall preterm birth <32 weeks (aOR 0.31, CI 0.1-0.86, p = .018), and overall preterm birth <36 weeks (aOR 0.37, CI 0.10-0.84, p = .030). When stratified by short cervix or cervical dilation in the cerclage versus no cerclage groups, there was a significant decrease in spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks in the cerclage group with cervical dilation (11.1 versus 41.2%, p = .01) but not in the cerclage group with short cervix only, even for cervical length <1.5 cm. Pregnancy latency was 91 days in the cerclage group versus 57 days in the no cerclage group (p = .001), with a median gestational age at delivery of 35 versus 32 weeks (p = .002). There was no increase in chorioamnionitis in the cerclage group. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in birth weight (median 2278 versus 1665 g, p < .001) and decrease in perinatal death <30 days (1.6 versus 12.9%, p = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Cerclage in twin pregnancies significantly decreased the rate of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks compared to expectant management. However, when stratified by cerclage indication, this decrease in primary outcome only remained significant in the group with cervical dilation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prematurity; cervical insufficiency; multiple gestation; rescue; short cervix

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29363371      PMCID: PMC6251764          DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1427719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  18 in total

1.  Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester: why cerclage therapy may not help.

Authors:  O A Rust; R O Atlas; J Reed; J van Gaalen; J Balducci
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The efficacy of sonographically indicated cerclage in multiple gestations.

Authors:  Ashley S Roman; Andrei Rebarber; Leonardo Pereira; Anna K Sfakianaki; Jeanine Mulholland; Vincenzo Berghella
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Outcomes after physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin gestations.

Authors:  Emily S Miller; Priya V Rajan; William A Grobman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Cristina Zanardini; Giorgio Pagani; Anna Fichera; Federico Prefumo; Tiziana Frusca
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 5.  Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data.

Authors:  Vincenzo Berghella; Anthony O Odibo; Meekai S To; Orion A Rust; Sietske M Althuisius
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone.

Authors:  S M Althuisius; G A Dekker; P Hummel; D J Bekedam; H P van Geijn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No.142: Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Vincenzo Berghella; Anthony O Odibo; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Outcomes of emergency or physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies compared to singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  Andrei Rebarber; Samuel Bender; Michael Silverstein; Daniel H Saltzman; Chad K Klauser; Nathan S Fox
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Outcomes of mid-trimester emergency cerclage in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Ishai Levin; Liat Salzer; Sharon Maslovitz; Amiram Avni; Joseph B Lessing; Asnat Groutz; Benny Almog
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.587

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Influence of twin pregnancy by assisted reproductive technology on neonatal outcomes].

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Chen; Jin-Gai Zhu; Zhang-Bin Yu; Cheng-Yao Jiang; Shu-Ping Han
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01

2.  Effects of emergency cerclage on the neonatal outcomes of preterm twin pregnancies compared to preterm singleton pregnancies: A neonatal focus.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Chun; Jiyoung Chun; Keun-Young Lee; Tae-Jung Sung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ultrasound-Indicated Cervical Cerclage Efficacy Between 16 and 28 Weeks of Gestation in Twin Pregnancy: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Li-Ping Yao; Qing Yang; Jin-Dan Pei; Yue-Lin Wu; Sheng Wan; Zhi-Qin Chen; Xiao-Lin Hua
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-03-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.