Literature DB >> 29363217

Predicting drug efficacy in chronic low back pain by quantitative sensory tests.

J Schliessbach1,2, A Siegenthaler3, L Bütikofer4, P Vuilleumier1, P Jüni5, U Stamer1, L Arendt-Nielsen6, M Curatolo6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drugs are prescribed for chronic low back pain without knowing in advance whether a patient will respond to them or not. Quantitative sensory tests (QST) can discriminate patients according to sensory phenotype, possibly reflecting underlying mechanisms of pain processing. QST may therefore be a screening tool to identify potential responders to a certain drug. The aim of this study was to investigate whether QST can predict analgesic effects of oxycodone, imipramine and clobazam in chronic low back pain.
METHODS: Oxycodone 15 mg (n = 50), imipramine 75 mg (n = 50) and clobazam 20 mg (n = 49) were compared to active placebo tolterodine 1 mg in a randomized, double-blinded, crossover fashion. Electrical, pressure and thermal QST were performed at baseline and after 1 and 2 h. Pain intensity was assessed on a 0-10 numeric rating scale every 30 min for up to 2 h. The ability of baseline QST to predict pain reduction after 2 h was analysed using linear mixed models. Genetic variants of drug-metabolizing enzymes and genes affecting pain sensitivity were examined as covariables.
RESULTS: No predictor of analgesic effect was found for oxycodone and clobazam. Thermal QST was associated with analgesic effect of imipramine: patients more sensitive to heat or cold were more likely to experience an effect of imipramine. Pharmacogenetic variants and pain-related candidate genes were not associated with drug efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS: Thermal QST have the potential to predict imipramine effect in chronic low back pain. Oxycodone and clobazam effects could not be predicted by any of the selected QST or genetic variants. SIGNIFICANCE: Predicting drug efficacy in chronic low back pain remains difficult. There is some evidence that patients more sensitive to heat and cold pain respond better to imipramine.
© 2018 European Pain Federation - EFIC®.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29363217     DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  9 in total

1.  Reliability and Validity of the Boston Bedside Quantitative Sensory Testing Battery for Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Alexandra E Koulouris; Robert R Edwards; Kathleen Dorado; Kristin L Schreiber; Asimina Lazaridou; Sharika Rajan; Jeffrey White; Jenniffer Garcia; Christopher Gibbons; Roy Freeman
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 2.  Metabolomics in chronic pain research.

Authors:  Shweta Teckchandani; G A Nagana Gowda; Daniel Raftery; Michele Curatolo
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.931

3.  Does aerobic exercise training alter responses to opioid analgesics in individuals with chronic low back pain? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen Bruehl; John W Burns; Kelli Koltyn; Rajnish Gupta; Asokumar Buvanendran; David Edwards; Melissa Chont; Yung Hsuan Wu; Amanda Stone
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 7.926

4.  Evaluating the association of TRPA1 gene polymorphisms with pain sensitivity: a protocol for an adaptive recall by genotype study.

Authors:  Aidan P Nickerson; Laura J Corbin; Nicholas J Timpson; Keith Phillips; Anthony E Pickering; James P Dunham
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.063

5.  Modified Sensory Testing in Non-verbal Patients Receiving Novel Intrathecal Therapies for Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Laura Cornelissen; Carolina Donado; Timothy W Yu; Charles B Berde
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 6.  The beneficial role of companion animals in translational pain research.

Authors:  B Duncan X Lascelles; Dottie C Brown; Michael G Conzemius; Marie Gill; Michael L Oshinsky; Michelle Sharkey
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-05

7.  Role of daytime variation in pharmaceutical effects of sufentanil, dezocine, and tramadol: A matched observational study.

Authors:  Wanxia Gan; Xinqing Yang; Jie Chen; Hongyao Lyu; Ai Yan; Guizhen Chen; Shiqi Li; Yamei Zhang; Ling Dan; He Huang; Guangyou Duan
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.988

8.  Greater Conditioned Pain Modulation Is Associated With Enhanced Morphine Analgesia in Healthy Individuals and Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Stephen Bruehl; Christopher R France; Amanda L Stone; Rajnish Gupta; Asokumar Buvanendran; Melissa Chont; John W Burns
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.423

Review 9.  The Definition, Assessment, and Prevalence of (Human Assumed) Central Sensitisation in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ingrid Schuttert; Hans Timmerman; Kristian K Petersen; Megan E McPhee; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Michiel F Reneman; André P Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.