Literature DB >> 29363116

EML4-ALK fusion variant V3 is a high-risk feature conferring accelerated metastatic spread, early treatment failure and worse overall survival in ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer.

Petros Christopoulos1,2, Volker Endris3, Farastuk Bozorgmehr1,2, Mei Elsayed1,2, Martina Kirchner3, Jonas Ristau4, Ivo Buchhalter3, Roland Penzel3, Felix J Herth2,5, Claus P Heussel2,6, Martin Eichhorn2,7, Thomas Muley2,8, Michael Meister2,8, Jürgen R Fischer9, Stefan Rieken4, Arne Warth2,3, Helge Bischoff1, Peter Schirmacher3, Albrecht Stenzinger3, Michael Thomas1,2.   

Abstract

In order to identify anaplastic lymphoma kinase-driven non-small cell lung cancer (ALK+ NSCLC) patients with a worse outcome, who might require alternative therapeutic approaches, we retrospectively analyzed all stage IV cases treated at our institutions with one of the main echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK fusion variants V1, V2 and V3 as detected by next-generation sequencing or reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (n = 67). Progression under tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment was evaluated both according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and by the need to change systemic therapy. EML4-ALK fusion variants V1, V2 and V3 were found in 39%, 10% and 51% of cases, respectively. Patients with V3-driven tumors had more metastatic sites at diagnosis than cases with the V1 and V2 variants (mean 3.3 vs. 1.9 and 1.6, p = 0.005), which suggests increased disease aggressiveness. Furthermore, V3-positive status was associated with earlier failure after treatment with first and second-generation ALK TKI (median progression-free survival [PFS] by RECIST in the first line 7.3 vs. 39.3 months, p = 0.01), platinum-based combination chemotherapy (median PFS 5.4 vs. 15.2 months for the first line, p = 0.008) and cerebral radiotherapy (median brain PFS 6.1 months vs. not reached for cerebral radiotherapy during first-line treatment, p = 0.028), and with inferior overall survival (39.8 vs. 59.6 months in median, p = 0.017). Thus, EML4-ALK fusion variant V3 is a high-risk feature for ALK+ NSCLC. Determination of V3 status should be considered as part of the initial workup for this entity in order to select patients for more aggressive surveillance and treatment strategies.
© 2018 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALK+ NSCLC; EML4-ALK fusion variant; metastasis; survival; treatment failure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29363116     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  32 in total

1.  Complete Pathological Response to Crizotinib in a Patient with ALK-rearranged Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Marissa S Mattar; Jason Chang; Ryma Benayed; Darragh Halpenny; Astin Powers; David E Kleiner; Alexander Drilon; Mark G Kris
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  ALK detection in lung cancer: identification of atypical and cryptic ALK rearrangements using an optimal algorithm.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Liu; Shafei Wu; Xiaohua Shi; Zhiyong Liang; Xuan Zeng
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  An improved assay for detection of theranostic gene translocations and MET exon 14 skipping in thoracic oncology.

Authors:  Nicolas Piton; Marie-Delphine Lanic; Florent Marguet; Aude Lamy; France Blanchard; Florian Guisier; Mathieu Viennot; Mathieu Salaün; Luc Thiberville; Fabrice Jardin; Jean-Christophe Sabourin; Philippe Ruminy
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 4.  Targeting ALK Rearrangements in NSCLC: Current State of the Art.

Authors:  Ling Peng; Liping Zhu; Yilan Sun; Justin Stebbing; Giovanni Selvaggi; Yongchang Zhang; Zhentao Yu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Association of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression with Fusion Variants and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma Receiving Crizotinib.

Authors:  Ching-Yao Yang; Wei-Yu Liao; Chao-Chi Ho; Kuan-Yu Chen; Tzu-Hsiu Tsai; Chia-Lin Hsu; Yi-Nan Liu; Kang-Yi Su; Yih-Leong Chang; Chen-Tu Wu; Bin-Chi Liao; Chia-Chi Hsu; Wei-Hsun Hsu; Jih-Hsiang Lee; Chia-Chi Lin; Jin-Yuan Shih; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Chong-Jen Yu
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-05-13

6.  Targeting EML4-ALK gene fusion variant 3 in thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Mehtap Derya Aydemirli; Jaap D H van Eendenburg; Tom van Wezel; Jan Oosting; Willem E Corver; Ellen Kapiteijn; Hans Morreau
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.678

7.  Molecular and clinical analysis of Chinese patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Zhou; Jiawei Shou; Jin Sheng; Chunwei Xu; Shengxiang Ren; Xiuyu Cai; Qian Chu; Wenxian Wang; Qinhong Zhen; Yuefen Zhou; Wenfeng Li; Hong Pan; Hongsen Li; Tao Sun; Huanqing Cheng; Huina Wang; Feng Lou; Chuangzhou Rao; Shanbo Cao; Hongming Pan; Yong Fang
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 6.716

8.  EML4-ALK V3 oncogenic fusion proteins promote microtubule stabilization and accelerated migration through NEK9 and NEK7.

Authors:  Laura O'Regan; Giancarlo Barone; Rozita Adib; Chang Gok Woo; Hui Jeong Jeong; Emily L Richardson; Mark W Richards; Patricia A J Muller; Spencer J Collis; Dean A Fennell; Jene Choi; Richard Bayliss; Andrew M Fry
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 9.  Upfront Management of ALK-Rearranged Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: One Inhibitor Fits All?

Authors:  Fabrizio Tabbò; Francesco Passiglia; Silvia Novello
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  [A Case of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Three ALK Inhibitors 
and Chemotherapy].

Authors:  Jue Wang; Xiaoyan Xu; Yanyan Sun; Hui Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.