Literature DB >> 29363107

Identifying co-opted transposable elements using comparative epigenomics.

David Venuto1, Guillaume Bourque1,2,3.   

Abstract

The human genome gives rise to different epigenomic landscapes that define each cell type and can be deregulated in disease. Recent efforts by ENCODE, the NIH Roadmap and the International Human Epigenome Consortium (IHEC) have made significant advances towards assembling reference epigenomic maps of various tissues. Notably, these projects have found that approximately 80% of human DNA was biochemically active in at least one epigenomic assay while only approximately 10% of the sequence displayed signs of purifying selection. Given that transposable elements (TEs) make up at least 50% of the human genome and can be actively transcribed or act as regulatory elements either for their own purposes or be co-opted for the benefit of their host; we are interested in exploring their overall contribution to the "functional" genome. Traditional methods used to identify functional DNA have relied on comparative genomics, conservation analysis and low throughput validation assays. To discover co-opted TEs, and distinguish them from noisy genomic elements, we argue that comparative epigenomic methods will also be important.
© 2018 Japanese Society of Developmental Biologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative epigenomics; epigenetics; functional genome; genomics; transposable elements

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29363107     DOI: 10.1111/dgd.12423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Growth Differ        ISSN: 0012-1592            Impact factor:   2.053


  4 in total

1.  EpiAlignment: alignment with both DNA sequence and epigenomic data.

Authors:  Jia Lu; Xiaoyi Cao; Sheng Zhong
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Diverse families of transposable elements affect the transcriptional regulation of stress-response genes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  José Luis Villanueva-Cañas; Vivien Horvath; Laura Aguilera; Josefa González
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Mobile genomics: tools and techniques for tackling transposons.

Authors:  Kathryn O'Neill; David Brocks; Molly Gale Hammell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Ten things you should know about transposable elements.

Authors:  Guillaume Bourque; Kathleen H Burns; Mary Gehring; Vera Gorbunova; Andrei Seluanov; Molly Hammell; Michaël Imbeault; Zsuzsanna Izsvák; Henry L Levin; Todd S Macfarlan; Dixie L Mager; Cédric Feschotte
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 13.583

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.