Literature DB >> 29362978

Social tolerance in not-so-social pumas.

Jennifer Vonk1.   

Abstract

Elbroch, Levy, Lubell, Quigley, and Caragiulo (2017, Science Advances, 3, e170218) used GPS and motion-activated camera technology to track and rate the interactions between solitary wild pumas. They found that tolerance at feeding sites was not predicted by kinship but, rather, indicated the ability to engage in direct reciprocity, challenging previous assumptions about social cognition in solitary species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carnivore; Puma; Reciprocity; Social interactions; Solitary

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29362978     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-017-0312-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  5 in total

1.  Social bet-hedging in vampire bats.

Authors:  Gerald G Carter; Damien R Farine; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Survival of the Friendliest: Homo sapiens Evolved via Selection for Prosociality.

Authors:  Brian Hare
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 3.  The evolutionary origins of friendship.

Authors:  Robert M Seyfarth; Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 4.  Non-kin cooperation in bats.

Authors:  Gerald S Wilkinson; Gerald G Carter; Kirsten M Bohn; Danielle M Adams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Adaptive social strategies in a solitary carnivore.

Authors:  L Mark Elbroch; Michael Levy; Mark Lubell; Howard Quigley; Anthony Caragiulo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.