Literature DB >> 29362102

Genomic relationships reveal significant dominance effects for growth in hybrid Eucalyptus.

Biyue Tan1, Dario Grattapaglia2, Harry X Wu3, Pär K Ingvarsson4.   

Abstract

Non-additive genetic effects can be effectively exploited in control-pollinated families with the availability of genome-wide markers. We used 41,304 SNP markers and compared pedigree vs. marker-based genetic models by analysing height, diameter, basic density and pulp yield for Eucalyptus urophylla × E.grandis control-pollinated families represented by 949 informative individuals. We evaluated models accounting for additive, dominance, and first-order epistatic interactions (additive by additive, dominance by dominance, and additive by dominance). We showed that the models can capture a large proportion of the genetic variance from dominance and epistasis for growth traits as those components are typically not independent. We also showed that we could partition genetic variances more precisely when using relationship matrices derived from markers compared to using only pedigree information. In addition, phenotypic prediction accuracies were only slightly increased by including dominance effects for growth traits since estimates of non-additive variances yielded rather high standard errors. This novel result improves our current understanding of the architecture of quantitative traits and recommends accounting for dominance variance when developing genomic selection strategies in hybrid Eucalyptus.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breeding strategy; Dominance; Epistasis; Heritability; Predictive ability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29362102     DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Sci        ISSN: 0168-9452            Impact factor:   4.729


  10 in total

1.  Improved genomic prediction of clonal performance in sugarcane by exploiting non-additive genetic effects.

Authors:  Seema Yadav; Xianming Wei; Priya Joyce; Felicity Atkin; Emily Deomano; Yue Sun; Loan T Nguyen; Elizabeth M Ross; Tony Cavallaro; Karen S Aitken; Ben J Hayes; Kai P Voss-Fels
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.574

Review 2.  Quantitative Genetics and Genomics Converge to Accelerate Forest Tree Breeding.

Authors:  Dario Grattapaglia; Orzenil B Silva-Junior; Rafael T Resende; Eduardo P Cappa; Bárbara S F Müller; Biyue Tan; Fikret Isik; Blaise Ratcliffe; Yousry A El-Kassaby
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Efficiency of genomic prediction across two Eucalyptus nitens seed orchards with different selection histories.

Authors:  Mari Suontama; Jaroslav Klápště; Emily Telfer; Natalie Graham; Toby Stovold; Charlie Low; Russell McKinley; Heidi Dungey
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Marker effects and heritability estimates using additive-dominance genomic architectures via artificial neural networks in Coffea canephora.

Authors:  Ithalo Coelho de Sousa; Moysés Nascimento; Isabela de Castro Sant'anna; Eveline Teixeira Caixeta; Camila Ferreira Azevedo; Cosme Damião Cruz; Felipe Lopes da Silva; Emilly Ruas Alkimim; Ana Carolina Campana Nascimento; Nick Vergara Lopes Serão
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine.

Authors:  Eduardo P Cappa; Charles Chen; Jennifer G Klutsch; Jaime Sebastian-Azcona; Blaise Ratcliffe; Xiaojing Wei; Letitia Da Ros; Aziz Ullah; Yang Liu; Andy Benowicz; Shane Sadoway; Shawn D Mansfield; Nadir Erbilgin; Barb R Thomas; Yousry A El-Kassaby
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 4.547

6.  Genomic Predictions With Nonadditive Effects Improved Estimates of Additive Effects and Predictions of Total Genetic Values in Pinus sylvestris.

Authors:  Ainhoa Calleja-Rodriguez; ZhiQiang Chen; Mari Suontama; Jin Pan; Harry X Wu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Effect of number of annual rings and tree ages on genomic predictive ability for solid wood properties of Norway spruce.

Authors:  Linghua Zhou; Zhiqiang Chen; Lars Olsson; Thomas Grahn; Bo Karlsson; Harry X Wu; Sven-Olof Lundqvist; María Rosario García-Gil
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Increased Prediction Ability in Norway Spruce Trials Using a Marker X Environment Interaction and Non-Additive Genomic Selection Model.

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Chen; John Baison; Jin Pan; Johan Westin; Maria Rosario García Gil; Harry X Wu
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Favorable Conditions for Genomic Evaluation to Outperform Classical Pedigree Evaluation Highlighted by a Proof-of-Concept Study in Poplar.

Authors:  Marie Pégard; Vincent Segura; Facundo Muñoz; Catherine Bastien; Véronique Jorge; Leopoldo Sanchez
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population of Eucalyptus pellita.

Authors:  Saravanan Thavamanikumar; Roger J Arnold; Jianzhong Luo; Bala R Thumma
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 3.154

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.