Literature DB >> 29361630

Phase 1 trials of PEGylated recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Jeffrey R Infante, Ronald L Korn, Lee S Rosen, Patricia LoRusso, Samuel S Dychter, Joy Zhu, Daniel C Maneval, Ping Jiang, H Michael Shepard, Gregory Frost, Daniel D Von Hoff, Mitesh J Borad, Ramesh K Ramanathan.   

Abstract

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.327.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29361630      PMCID: PMC5785755          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Correction to: British Journal of Cancer (2018) 118, 156–167; doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.327; published online 26 September 2017 There was an error in the description of the pharmacodynamics within the ‘Materials and methods’ section of this manuscript, and with the reference cited Printz . The correct description is shown below: Pharmacodynamics HA plasma concentrations: The in vivo pharmacologic activity of PEGPH20 was evaluated by measuring plasma concentrations of HA following PEGPH20 administration. Blood samples were collected and analysed at a bioanalytical laboratory (MicroConstants, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using a validated assay (Printz ). Plasma samples were enzymatically digested with chondroitinase ABC to hydrolyse different sizes of HA to the smallest HA-disaccharide, followed by derivatization with 4-nitrobenzyl hydroxylamine and analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma concentrations of HA were determined using reference standards and reported as nanograms of HA-disaccharide per millilitre of plasma. The lower limit of quantification was 42.3 ng ml−1 (normal range, 10–100 ng ml−1, Fraser et al, 1997). There is no impact on the study results disclosed in the manuscript nor on the conclusions of the study. The results displayed in Figure 1 PEGPH20 Plasma Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics are consistent with the corrected method as described above. The original HTML and PDF versions of this manuscript have been corrected, and can be found online and in the print issue.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic cancer treatment: better, but a long way to go.

Authors:  Robert J Torphy; Yuki Fujiwara; Richard D Schulick
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Dissecting the Stromal Signaling and Regulation of Myeloid Cells and Memory Effector T Cells in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Alex B Blair; Victoria M Kim; Stephen T Muth; May Tun Saung; Nathalie Lokker; Barbara Blouw; Todd D Armstrong; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Takahiro Tsujikawa; Lisa M Coussens; Jin He; Richard A Burkhart; Christopher L Wolfgang; Lei Zheng
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Evaluation of in-vitro cytotoxic effect of 5-FU loaded-chitosan nanoparticles against spheroid models.

Authors:  Taylor Smith; Kevin Affram; Errol Bulumko; Edward Agyare
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2018-10

4.  Prolonged in vivo expression and anti-tumor response of DNA-based anti-HER2 antibodies.

Authors:  Kevin Hollevoet; Elien De Smidt; Nick Geukens; Paul Declerck
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-02-06

Review 5.  Regulation of heterogeneous cancer-associated fibroblasts: the molecular pathology of activated signaling pathways.

Authors:  Go J Yoshida
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.