Literature DB >> 29361468

Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib versus standard of care in patients with high-risk, surgically resectable melanoma: a single-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.

Rodabe N Amaria1, Peter A Prieto2, Michael T Tetzlaff3, Alexandre Reuben2, Miles C Andrews2, Merrick I Ross2, Isabella C Glitza1, Janice Cormier2, Wen-Jen Hwu1, Hussein A Tawbi1, Sapna P Patel1, Jeffrey E Lee2, Jeffrey E Gershenwald2, Christine N Spencer4, Vancheswaran Gopalakrishnan2, Roland Bassett5, Lauren Simpson1, Rosalind Mouton1, Courtney W Hudgens3, Li Zhao4, Haifeng Zhu1, Zachary A Cooper6, Khalida Wani3, Alexander Lazar3, Patrick Hwu1, Adi Diab1, Michael K Wong1, Jennifer L McQuade1, Richard Royal2, Anthony Lucci2, Elizabeth M Burton2, Sangeetha Reddy7, Padmanee Sharma8, James Allison9, Phillip A Futreal4, Scott E Woodman1, Michael A Davies1, Jennifer A Wargo10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dual BRAF and MEK inhibition produces a response in a large number of patients with stage IV BRAF-mutant melanoma. The existing standard of care for patients with clinical stage III melanoma is upfront surgery and consideration for adjuvant therapy, which is insufficient to cure most patients. Neoadjuvant targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors (such as dabrafenib and trametinib) might provide clinical benefit in this high-risk p opulation.
METHODS: We undertook this single-centre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Eligible participants were adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed surgically resectable clinical stage III or oligometastatic stage IV BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K (ie, Val600Glu or Val600Lys)-mutated melanoma. Eligible patients had to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, a life expectancy of more than 3 years, and no previous exposure to BRAF or MEK inhibitors. Exclusion criteria included metastases to bone, brain, or other sites where complete surgical excision was in doubt. We randomly assigned patients (1:2) to either upfront surgery and consideration for adjuvant therapy (standard of care group) or neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib (8 weeks of neoadjuvant oral dabrafenib 150 mg twice per day and oral trametinib 2 mg per day followed by surgery, then up to 44 weeks of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib starting 1 week after surgery for a total of 52 weeks of treatment). Randomisation was not masked and was implemented by the clinical trial conduct website maintained by the trial centre. Patients were stratified by disease stage. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed event-free survival (ie, patients who were alive without disease progression) at 12 months in the intent-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02231775.
FINDINGS: Between Oct 23, 2014, and April 13, 2016, we randomly assigned seven patients to standard of care, and 14 to neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib. The trial was stopped early after a prespecified interim safety analysis that occurred after a quarter of the participants had been accrued revealed significantly longer event-free survival with neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib than with standard of care. After a median follow-up of 18·6 months (IQR 14·6-23·1), significantly more patients receiving neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib were alive without disease progression than those receiving standard of care (ten [71%] of 14 patients vs none of seven in the standard of care group; median event-free survival was 19·7 months [16·2-not estimable] vs 2·9 months [95% CI 1·7-not estimable]; hazard ratio 0·016, 95% CI 0·00012-0·14, p<0·0001). Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib were well tolerated with no occurrence of grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths. The most common adverse events in the neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib group were expected grade 1-2 toxicities including chills (12 patients [92%]), headache (12 [92%]), and pyrexia (ten [77%]). The most common grade 3 adverse event was diarrhoea (two patients [15%]).
INTERPRETATION: Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib significantly improved event-free survival versus standard of care in patients with high-risk, surgically resectable, clinical stage III-IV melanoma. Although the trial finished early, limiting generalisability of the results, the findings provide proof-of-concept and support the rationale for further investigation of neoadjuvant approaches in this disease. This trial is currently continuing accrual as a single-arm study of neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29361468     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30015-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  53 in total

1.  Tumor-draining lymph nodes are pivotal in PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint therapy.

Authors:  Marieke F Fransen; Mark Schoonderwoerd; Philipp Knopf; Marcel Gm Camps; Lukas Jac Hawinkels; Manfred Kneilling; Thorbald van Hall; Ferry Ossendorp
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-12-06

Review 2.  Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma.

Authors:  Maiko Wada-Ohno; Takamichi Ito; Masutaka Furue
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-06-24

Review 3.  Immunological effects of BRAF+MEK inhibition.

Authors:  Paolo A Ascierto; Reinhard Dummer
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 8.110

4.  Pathological assessment of resection specimens after neoadjuvant therapy for metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  M T Tetzlaff; J L Messina; J E Stein; X Xu; R N Amaria; C U Blank; B A van de Wiel; P M Ferguson; R V Rawson; M I Ross; A J Spillane; J E Gershenwald; R P M Saw; A C J van Akkooi; W J van Houdt; T C Mitchell; A M Menzies; G V Long; J A Wargo; M A Davies; V G Prieto; J M Taube; R A Scolyer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Locally Advanced Melanoma.

Authors:  Meredith S Pelster; Rodabe N Amaria
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-02-05

Review 6.  Surgery for Metastatic Melanoma: an Evolving Concept.

Authors:  Alessandro A E Testori; Stephanie A Blankenstein; Alexander C J van Akkooi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  The value of metastasectomy in stage IV cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Uwe Wollina; Piotr Brzezinski
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2018-03-06

8.  Clinicopathological Features, Staging, and Current Approaches to Treatment in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma.

Authors:  Emily Z Keung; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Therapeutic Advancements Across Clinical Stages in Melanoma, With a Focus on Targeted Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Claudia Trojaniello; Jason J Luke; Paolo A Ascierto
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  DNA Sequencing of Small Bowel Adenocarcinomas Identifies Targetable Recurrent Mutations in the ERBB2 Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Liana Adam; F Anthony San Lucas; Richard Fowler; Yao Yu; Wenhui Wu; Yulun Liu; Huamin Wang; David Menter; Michael T Tetzlaff; Joe Ensor; Ganiraju Manyam; Stefan T Arold; Chad Huff; Scott Kopetz; Paul Scheet; Michael J Overman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.