Literature DB >> 29361376

Diagnosis and treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: Recent trends to note.

Takuya Otani1, Yasuhiko Kawaguchi2, Keishi Marumo2.   

Abstract

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is not frequently encountered during routine practice and diagnosis and treatment are often delayed. It is important to understand symptoms and imaging features to avoid delayed diagnosis. After the diagnosis is made correct classification of the disease is required. The classification should be based on the physeal stability in order to choose safe and effective treatment. However, surgeons should bear in mind that the assessment is challenging and actual physeal stability is not always consistent with the stability predicted by a clinical classification method. TREATMENT OF STABLE SCFE: Closed reduction is not indicated for stable SCFE, where continuity between the epiphysis and metaphysis has not been disrupted. Treatment method(s) is (are) chosen from in-situ fixation, osteotomy and femoroacetabular impingement treatment. A single screw fixation is often used to fix the epiphysis and the dynamic method is considered especially for young patients. Traditional three-dimensional trochanteric osteotomies have been associated with procedural complexity and uncertainty. A simpler osteotomy method using an updated imaging analysis technology should be considered. Modified-Dunn procedure is indicated for a severe stable SCFE. However, caution is required because recent studies have reported a high rate of complications including postoperative femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) and hip instability when this method is indicated for stable SCFE. TREATMENT OF UNSTABLE SCFE: Treatment of unstable SCFE is difficult and complication rate is high. Most of unstable SCFE patients were previously treated with closed method and it was difficult to predict an occurrence of postoperative AVN. However, treatment of unstable SCFE has gradually changed in recent years and many studies have shown that physeal hemodynamics can be assessed during treatment. Preoperative assessments include contrast-enhanced MRI and bone scintigraphy. Intraoperative assessments include confirmation of bleeding after drilling the femoral head and monitoring the intracranial pressure by laser doppler flowmetry. It is expected that postoperative AVN can be prevented in many cases by performing the treatment while assessing the intraoperative physeal hemodynamics. Open surgeries have begun to be indicated in the treatment of unstable SCFE through either of anterior approach or (modified) Dunn procedure. The authors expect that recent improvements in assessment of physeal hemodynamics and open treatment method provide improved clinical outcomes in the treatment of SCFE.
Copyright © 2018 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29361376     DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  9 in total

1.  The pelvic radiograph: lines, arcs and stripes.

Authors:  Phey Ming Yeap; Matthew J Budak
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors and Outcomes in the Surgical Management of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

Authors:  Winston Jin; Sarah Farrell; Eva Habib; Ash Sandhu; Jeffrey N Bone; Emily Schaeffer; Kishore Mulpuri
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-07-06

3.  Advantages of Telescopic Screw in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Treatment: A Retrospective Study and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alexandru Ulici; Adelina Ionescu; Diana Dogaru; Olivia Hotoboc; Catalin Nahoi; Cristian Zamfir; Madalina Carp
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF SEVERE SCFE TREATMENT AT IOT-FMUSP FROM 2012 TO 2018.

Authors:  Edelvan Gabana; Bruno Sergio Ferreira Massa; Carlos Augusto Malheiros Luzo; Paulo Roberto Dos Reis; Jorge Dos Santos Silva; Kodi Edson Kojima
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 0.683

5.  Does a History of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in Patients Undergoing Femoroacetabular Osteoplasty for Femoroacetabular Impingement Affect Outcomes Scores or Risk of Reoperation?

Authors:  Ryan Sutton; Steven Yacovelli; Hamed Vahedi; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Causes of Delayed Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: The Importance of the Frog Lateral Pelvis Projection.

Authors:  Panagiotis V Samelis; Christos Loukas; Sophia Kantanoleon; Harris Lalos; Nikolaos Anoua; Panagiotis Kolovos; Flourentzos Georgiou; Apostolos-Lykourgos Konstantinou
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-18

Review 7.  Predicting epiphyseal stability of slipped capital femoral epiphysis with preoperative CT imaging.

Authors:  Megan E Fischer-Colbrie; Craig R Louer; James D Bomar; Peter Hahn; Eric W Edmonds; Andrew T Pennock; Vidyadhar V Upasani
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Non-traumatic Infantile Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis following an Epileptic Seizure - A Case Report.

Authors:  Papavasiliou Kyriakos; Stamiris Dimitrios; Stamiris Stavros; Zafeiriou Dimitrios; Tsiridis Eleftherios; Sayegh Fares
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2019

Review 9.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis with hypopituitarism in adults: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Zhixin Niu; Jinshuo Tang; Xianyue Shen; Shenghao Xu; Zhongsheng Zhou; Tong Liu; Jianlin Zuo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.