Literature DB >> 29361247

Changes in Primary Care Health Care Utilization after Inclusion of Epidemiologic Data in Lumbar Spine MR Imaging Reports for Uncomplicated Low Back Pain.

Jessica G Fried1, Angeline S Andrew1, Natalie Y Ring1, David A Pastel1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether inclusion of an epidemiologic statement in radiology reports of lumbar magnetic resonance (MR) imaging influences downstream health care utilization in the primary care population. Materials and Methods Beginning July 1, 2013, a validated epidemiologic statement regarding prevalence of common findings in asymptomatic patients was included in all lumbar MR imaging reports at a tertiary academic medical center. Data were collected from July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2014, and retrospective analysis was completed in September 2016. The electronic medical record was reviewed to capture health care utilization rates in patients for 1 year after index MR imaging. Of 4527 eligible adult patients with low back pain referred for lumbar spine MR imaging during the study period, 375 patients had their studies ordered by in-network primary care providers, did not have findings other than degenerative disease, and had at least one follow-up encounter within the system within 1 year of index MR imaging. In the before-and-after study design, a pre-statement-implementation cohort was compared with a post-statement-implementation cohort by using univariate and multivariate statistical models to evaluate treatment utilization rates in these groups. Results Patients in the statement group were 12% less likely to be referred to a spine specialist (137 of 187 [73%] vs 159 of 188 [85%]; P = .007) and were 7% less likely to undergo repeat imaging (seven of 187 [4%] vs 20 of 188 [11%]; P = .01) compared with patients in the nonstatement group. The intervention was not associated with any change in narcotic prescription (53 of 188 [28%] vs 54 of 187 [29%]; P = .88) or with the rate of low back surgery (24 of 188 [13%] vs 16 of 187 [9%]; P = .19). Conclusion In this study, inclusion of a simple epidemiologic statement in lumbar MR imaging reports was associated with decreased utilization in high-cost domains of low back pain management. © RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29361247     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Characteristics and Effectiveness of Interventions That Target the Reporting, Communication, or Clinical Interpretation of Lumbar Imaging Findings: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  J L Witherow; H J Jenkins; J M Elliott; G H Ip; C G Maher; J S Magnussen; M J Hancock
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Consumer understanding of terms used in imaging reports requested for low back pain: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Caitlin Farmer; Denise A O'Connor; Hopin Lee; Kirsten McCaffery; Christopher Maher; Dave Newell; Aidan Cashin; David Byfield; Jeffrey Jarvik; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Effects of Including Epidemiologic Data in Lumbar Spine Imaging Reports on Prescribing Non-Opioid Medications for Pain.

Authors:  Zachary A Marcum; Laura S Gold; Kathryn T James; Eric N Meier; Judith A Turner; David F Kallmes; Daniel C Cherkin; Richard A Deyo; Karen J Sherman; Patrick H Luetmer; Andrew L Avins; Brent Griffith; Janna L Friedly; Pradeep Suri; Patrick J Heagerty; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.473

4.  The Effect of Including Benchmark Prevalence Data of Common Imaging Findings in Spine Image Reports on Health Care Utilization Among Adults Undergoing Spine Imaging: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jarvik; Eric N Meier; Kathryn T James; Laura S Gold; Katherine W Tan; Larry G Kessler; Pradeep Suri; David F Kallmes; Daniel C Cherkin; Richard A Deyo; Karen J Sherman; Safwan S Halabi; Bryan A Comstock; Patrick H Luetmer; Andrew L Avins; Sean D Rundell; Brent Griffith; Janna L Friedly; Danielle C Lavallee; Kari A Stephens; Judith A Turner; Brian W Bresnahan; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-09-01

5.  A classification-based approach to low back pain in primary care - protocol for a benchmarking controlled trial.

Authors:  A S Simula; A Malmivaara; N Booth; J Karppinen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Downstream activities after laboratory testing in primary care: an exploratory outcome of the ELMO cluster randomised trial (Electronic Laboratory Medicine Ordering with evidence-based order sets in primary care).

Authors:  Veerle Piessens; Nicolas Delvaux; Stefan Heytens; Bert Aertgeerts; An De Sutter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  What behaviour change techniques have been used to improve adherence to evidence-based low back pain imaging?

Authors:  Amanda Hall; Helen Richmond; Andrea Pike; Rebecca Lawrence; Holly Etchegary; Michelle Swab; Jacqueline Y Thompson; Charlotte Albury; Jill Hayden; Andrea M Patey; James Matthews
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 7.327

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.