Literature DB >> 29361161

A COMPARISON OF OCCUPATIONAL DOSES IN CONVENTIONAL AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY IN IRAN.

Fereidoun Mianji1, Fariba Gheshlaghi2, Majid Darabi2, Mohammad Reza Kardan1, Mirshahram Hosseinipanah1, Farideh Zakeri1.   

Abstract

Occupational exposures in conventional and interventional radiology were investigated over a period of 10 years for all radiation workers. The statistical analysis carried out on the refined data showed that the average annual effective doses in conventional and interventional radiology were 0.28 and 0.59 mSv for measurably exposed workers and 0.18 and 0.52 mSv for all monitored workers in 2014. More than 99.9 and 82.8% of radiation workers in conventional and interventional radiology received annual doses less than the public dose limit (1 mSv) in 2014. Comparing the occupational dose levels of different countries (including Iran) in conventional as well as interventional radiology showed a poor comparability among them. Regarding the doses above the investigation level, the analysis showed that majority of them were due to improper use of personal dosimeters (false doses) and only 0.01 and 0.12% of the dose records actually crossed the level in conventional and interventional radiology in 2014.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29361161     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  1 in total

1.  Trends and Distribution Analysis of Occupational Exposure From Medical Practices in China (2010-2016).

Authors:  Jun Deng; Shengnan Fan; Tuo Wang; Shuxia Hao; Xiaohui Liu; Wen Guo; Quanfu Sun
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.316

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.