Literature DB >> 29360944

Migraine with visual aura associated with thicker visual cortex.

David Gaist1,2, Anders Hougaard3, Ellen Garde4, Nina Linde Reislev4, Rikke Wiwie5, Pernille Iversen4, Camilla Gøbel Madsen4,6, Morten Blaabjerg1,2, Helle Hvilsted Nielsen1,2, Thomas Krøigård1,2, Kamilla Østergaard1,2, Kirsten Ohm Kyvik2,7,8, Jacob Hjelmborg5, Kristoffer Madsen4, Hartwig Roman Siebner4,9, Messoud Ashina3.   

Abstract

Until recent years it was believed that migraine with aura was a disorder causing intermittent neurological symptoms, with no impact on brain structure. However, recent MRI studies have reported increased cortical thickness of visual and somatosensory areas in patients with migraine with aura, suggesting that such structural alterations were either due to increased neuronal density in the areas involved, or a result of multiple episodes of cortical spreading depression as part of aura attacks. Subsequent studies have yielded conflicting results, possibly due to methodological reasons, e.g. small number of subjects. In this cross-sectional study, we recruited females aged 30-60 years from the nationwide Danish Twin Registry. Brain MRI of females with migraine with aura (patients), their co-twins, and unrelated migraine-free twins (controls) were performed at a single centre and assessed for cortical thickness in predefined cortical areas (V1, V2, V3A, MT, somatosensory cortex), blinded to headache diagnoses. The difference in cortical thickness between patients and controls adjusted for age, and other potential confounders was assessed. Comparisons of twin pairs discordant for migraine with aura were also performed. Comparisons were based on 166 patients, 30 co-twins, and 137 controls. Compared with controls, patients had a thicker cortex in areas V2 [adjusted mean difference 0.032 mm (95% confidence interval 0.003 to 0.061), V3A [adjusted mean difference 0.037 mm (95% confidence interval 0.008 to 0.067)], while differences in the remaining areas examined were not statistically significant [adjusted mean difference (95% confidence interval): V1 0.022 (-0.007 to 0.052); MT: 0.018 (-0.011 to 0.047); somatosensory cortex: 0.020 (-0.009 to 0.049)]. We found no association between the regions of interest and active migraine, or number of lifetime aura attacks. Migraine with aura discordant twin pairs (n = 30) only differed in mean thickness of V2 (0.039 mm, 95% CI 0.005 to 0.074). In conclusion, females with migraine with aura have a thicker cortex corresponding to visual areas and our results indicate this may be an inherent trait rather than a result of repeated aura attacks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29360944     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  18 in total

1.  Mapping migraine to a common brain network.

Authors:  Matthew J Burke; Juho Joutsa; Alexander L Cohen; Louis Soussand; Danielle Cooke; Rami Burstein; Michael D Fox
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometric studies of migraine.

Authors:  Xinyue Zhang; Jun Zhou; Mengyuan Guo; Shirui Cheng; Yilin Chen; Nannan Jiang; Xinling Li; Shengjie Hu; Zilei Tian; Zhengjie Li; Fang Zeng
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 6.682

3.  Aberrant Modulations of Neurocognitive Network Dynamics in Migraine Comorbid With Tinnitus.

Authors:  Liping Lan; Yin Liu; Jin-Jing Xu; Di Ma; Xindao Yin; Yuanqing Wu; Yu-Chen Chen; Yuexin Cai
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.702

Review 4.  Advanced Imaging in the Evaluation of Migraine Headaches.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Chelsea Hesterman; Mollie Johnston; Nicholas R Dudeck; Andrew C Charles; Juan Pablo Villablanca
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Volume alterations of brainstem subregions in migraine with aura.

Authors:  Igor Petrusic; Marko Dakovic; Jasna Zidverc-Trajkovic
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 6.  Delineating conditions and subtypes in chronic pain using neuroimaging.

Authors:  Scott A Holmes; Jaymin Upadhyay; David Borsook
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-08-07

7.  Application of the Migraine Aura Complexity Score (MACS): Clinical and Neuroimaging Study.

Authors:  Igor Petrusic; Michele Viana; Marko Dakovic; Jasna Zidverc-Trajkovic
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Migraine with aura in women is not associated with structural thalamic abnormalities.

Authors:  Anders Hougaard; Silas Haahr Nielsen; David Gaist; Oula Puonti; Ellen Garde; Nina Linde Reislev; Pernille Iversen; Camilla Gøbel Madsen; Morten Blaabjerg; Helle Hvilsted Nielsen; Thomas Krøigård; Kamilla Østergaard; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik; Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen; Hartwig Roman Siebner; Messoud Ashina
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Clinical correlates of mathematical modeling of cortical spreading depression: Single-cases study.

Authors:  Julia M Kroos; Marina de Tommaso; Sebastiano Stramaglia; Eleonora Vecchio; Nicola Burdi; Luca Gerardo-Giorda
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Altered lateral geniculate nucleus functional connectivity in migraine without aura: a resting-state functional MRI study.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Xiaobin Huang; Wen Su; Yuchen Chen; Peng Wang; Cunnan Mao; Zhengfei Miao; Chunmei Liu; Chenjie Xu; Xindao Yin; Xinying Wu
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 7.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.