| Literature DB >> 29360751 |
Mengnan Zeng1,2, Li Zhang3,4, Miao Li5, Beibei Zhang6,7, Ning Zhou8, Yingying Ke9,10, Weisheng Feng11,12, Xiaoke Zheng13,14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the estrogenic effects of the extracts from Chinese yam and its effective compounds.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese yam; adenosine; arbutin; estrogen-like effect
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29360751 PMCID: PMC6017084 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23020011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Effect of yam extract on MCF-7 cell proliferation (x ± SD, n = 4).
| Groups | Dose | Cell Viability |
|---|---|---|
| Con | — | 1.00 ± 0.021 |
| 17β-E2(μM) | 1 | 1.25 ± 0.015 ** |
| Yam (mg/mL) | 1 | 1.31 ± 0.023 ** |
| 10−1 | 1.26 ± 0.028 ** | |
| 10−2 | 1.19 ± 0.022 * | |
| 10−3 | 1.17 ± 0.030 * | |
| 10−4 | 1.09 ± 0.027 |
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared to the control group.
Effect on uterus coefficient, estradiol (E2), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH) (x ± SD, n = 10).
| Groups | Dose (mg/kg) | Uterus Coefficient (%) | E2 (pmol/L) | FSH (mIU/mL) | LH (mIU/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | — | 0.1002 ± 0.009 | 31.12 ± 3.01 | 45.32 ± 5.90 | 3.69 ± 0.69 |
| EV | 0.33 | 0.2515 ± 0.021 ** | 38.94 ± 2.98 ** | 53.17 ± 4.97 ** | 4.77 ± 0.74 ** |
| LY | 1630 | 0.1227 ± 0.027 * | 39.21 ± 3.97 ** | 55.13 ± 4.26 ** | 3.54 ± 0.29 |
| HY | 3260 | 0.1269 ± 0.023 * | 42.09 ± 5.04 ** | 56.13 ± 3.26 ** | 3.61 ± 0.48 |
EV: Estradiol valerate, positive control; LY: Low dose of yam; HY: High dose of yam. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared to the control group.
Figure 1The expression of ERα, ERβ, and GPR30 in the uterus tested by the Western blot method (n = 3). LY: Low dose of yam, LH: High dose of yam. ** p < 0.01 compared to the control group.
Figure 2Blockade of ER and GPR30 completely abolished the proliferation of yam-stimulated MCF-7 cells (n = 4). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared to controls. (a) Effects of ICI182,780 on the proliferation of yam-stimulated MCF-7 cells. (b) Effects of MPP on the proliferation of yam-stimulated MCF-7 cells. (c) Effects of THC on the proliferation of yam-stimulated MCF-7 cells. (d) Effects of G-15 on the proliferation of yam-stimulated MCF-7 cells.
The influence on MCF-7 cell proliferation (x ± SD, n = 4).
| Groups | Dose (μM) | Cell Viability |
|---|---|---|
| Con | — | 1.00 ± 0.021 |
| 17β-E2 | 1 | 1.27 ± 0.016 ** |
| Yam (mg/ml) | 10−2 | 1.21 ± 0.024 * |
| adenosine | 5 | 1.20 ± 0.028 * |
| 10 | 1.25 ± 0.022 ** | |
| arbutin | 5 | 1.19 ± 0.030 * |
| 10 | 1.25 ± 0.027 ** |
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared to the control group.
Effect on uterus coefficient, E2, FSH and LH (x ± SD, n = 10).
| Groups | Dose (mg/kg) | Uterus Coefficient (%) | E2 (p mol/L) | FSH (mIU/mL) | LH (mIU/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | — | 0.0994 ± 0.013 | 29.05 ± 5.11 | 45.32 ± 5.90 | 4.55 ± 0.54 |
| EV | 0.33 | 0.2254 ± 0.015 ** | 40.16 ± 8.09 ** | 56.30 ± 5.12 ** | 5.14 ± 0.58 ** |
| yam | 1630 | 0.1323 ± 0.036 * | 38.23 ± 1.67 ** | 62.43 ± 7.72 ** | 4.16 ± 0.42 |
| adenosine | 50 | 0.1354 ± 0.023 * | 42.96 ± 5.36 ** | 60.14 ± 6.17 ** | 4.07 ± 0.41 |
| arbutin | 50 | 0.1271 ± 0.018 * | 38.39 ± 3.81 ** | 58.26 ± 6.32 ** | 4.19 ± 0.39 |
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared to the control group.
Figure 3The expression of ERα, ERβ, and GPR30 in the uterus and MCF-7 cells tested by the Western blot method (n = 3). ad: adenosine, ar: arbutin. (a–d) were the expression of ERα, ERβ, and GPR30 in the uterus. (e–h) were the expression of ERα, ERβ, and GPR30 in MCF-7 cells. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared to the control group.
Figure 4Effect of ICI 182780, MPP, THC and G-15 on MCF-7 cell proliferation (n = 3). (a) Effects of ICI182,780 on the proliferation of adenosine- and arbutin-stimulated MCF-7 cells. (b) Effects of MPP on the proliferation of adenosine- and arbutin-stimulated MCF-7 cells. (c) Effects of THC on the proliferation of adenosine- and arbutin-stimulated MCF-7 cells. (d) Effects of G-15 on the proliferation of adenosine- and arbutin-stimulated MCF-7 cells. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared to the control group.
Figure 5Effect of MPP, THC and G-15 on the expression of ERα, ERβ and GPR30 in MCF-7 cells (n = 3). The MPP, THC and GPR30 were added 30 minutes before treatment of 17β-E2, yam, adenosine and arbutin.
Effect of mouse serum on the proliferation of MCF-7 cells (x ± SD, n = 4).
| Groups | Cell Viability |
|---|---|
| Con | 1.00 ± 0.021 |
| E2 | 1.23 ± 0.022 ** |
| Yam | 1.25 ± 0.019 ** |
| Adenosine | 1.24 ± 0.027 ** |
| Arbutin | 1.21 ± 0.030 ** |
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared to the control group.
Figure 6HPLC-MS fingerprint of the yam, adenosine and arbutin. Adenosine and arbutin were verified as genuine resveratrol tetramers in the Chinese yam.