| Literature DB >> 29360504 |
Dimitry A Chistiakov1, Veronika A Myasoedova2, Andrey V Grechko3, Alexandra A Melnichenko2, Alexander N Orekhov4.
Abstract
The diagnostics and management of localized prostate cancer is complicated because of cancer heterogeneity and differentiated progression in various subgroups of patients. As a prostate cancer biomarker, FDA-approved detection assay for serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and its derivatives are not potent enough to diagnose prostate cancer, especially high-grade disease (Gleason ≥7). To date, a collection of new biomarkers was developed. Some of these markers are superior for primary screening while others are particularly helpful for cancer risk stratification, detection of high-grade cancer, and prediction of adverse events. Two of those markers such as proPSA (a part of the Prostate Health Index (PHI)) and prostate specific antigen 3 (PCA3) (a part of the PCA3 Progensa test) were recently approved by FDA for clinical use. Other markers are not PDA-approved yet but are available from Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA)-certified clinical laboratories. In this review, we characterize diagnostic performance of these markers and their diagnostic and prognostic utility for prostate cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Diagnosis; Prognosis; Prostate cancer; Prostate specific antigen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29360504 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.01.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Semin Cancer Biol ISSN: 1044-579X Impact factor: 15.707