| Literature DB >> 29359505 |
Stephen J Robson1, Caroline de Costa2, Cindy Woods3, Pauline Ding4, Ajay Rane5.
Abstract
Rising rates of caesarean section (CS) have been attributed, in part, to maternal-choice CS (MCCS). There are few published data regarding maternal and perinatal risks comparing MCCS with planned vaginal birth (VB) in uncomplicated first pregnancies to inform choice. We report the results of a pragmatic patient-preference cohort study of private patients in Australia: 64 women planning MCCS and 113 women planning VB. There were few differences in outcome between the two groups. The study highlighted the well-recognised difficulties in undertaking prospective research into MCCS.Entities:
Keywords: caesarean section; labour; logistic regression; maternal age; population
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29359505 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12766
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ISSN: 0004-8666 Impact factor: 2.100