Literature DB >> 29359505

Maternal-choice caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth in low-risk primigravid women.

Stephen J Robson1, Caroline de Costa2, Cindy Woods3, Pauline Ding4, Ajay Rane5.   

Abstract

Rising rates of caesarean section (CS) have been attributed, in part, to maternal-choice CS (MCCS). There are few published data regarding maternal and perinatal risks comparing MCCS with planned vaginal birth (VB) in uncomplicated first pregnancies to inform choice. We report the results of a pragmatic patient-preference cohort study of private patients in Australia: 64 women planning MCCS and 113 women planning VB. There were few differences in outcome between the two groups. The study highlighted the well-recognised difficulties in undertaking prospective research into MCCS.
© 2018 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caesarean section; labour; logistic regression; maternal age; population

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29359505     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  1 in total

1.  Reproducing fear: the effect of birth stories on nulligravid women's birth preferences.

Authors:  Yvette D Miller; Marion Danoy-Monet
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.007

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.