| Literature DB >> 29359123 |
Márcia Cristina Fernandes Messias1, Giovana Colozza Mecatti1, Célio Fernando Figueiredo Angolini2, Marcos Nogueira Eberlin2, Laura Credidio3, Carlos Augusto Real Martinez3, Cláudio Saddy Rodrigues Coy3, Patrícia de Oliveira Carvalho1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) is a common malignant tumor of the digestive tract and survival is highly dependent upon stage of disease at diagnosis. Lipidomic strategy can be used to identify potential biomarkers for establishing early diagnosis or therapeutic programs for RAC.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; lipidomic; lipoperoxidation; mass spectrometry; rectal adenocarcinoma
Year: 2018 PMID: 29359123 PMCID: PMC5766651 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Demographic data and major clinical characteristics of rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) patients and healthy volunteers.
| RAC patients | Healthy volunteers | |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | 18 | |
| Sex (M/F) | 10:13 | 10:8 |
| Age (years) | 56.6 ± 11.0 | 55.9 ± 11.9 |
| Race (%) | ||
| White | 20 (87) | 16 (89) |
| Black | 2 (8.7) | 2 (11) |
| Mulatto | 1 (4.3) | 0 |
| Yellow | 0 | 0 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.5 ± 4.6 | 25.3 ± 5.1 |
| Smoker (%) | – | |
| Yes | 4 (17.4) | – |
| No | 8 (34.8) | – |
| Ex | 5 (21.7) | – |
| No information | 6 (26.1) | – |
| Stages (%) | – | |
| 0 | 4 (17.4) | – |
| I and II | 9 (39.1) | – |
| III and IV | 10 (43.5) | – |
.
Figure 1Representative (+) ESI-MS (q-ToF) mass spectra of plasma from (A) a healthy volunteer and (B) a rectal adenocarcinoma patient. (B) Representation of the molecular structure (C24H48NO6P) m/z 478 identified as lisophosphatidylcholine [LPC (P-16:1)].
Figure 2(A) PLS-DA scores plot of healthy volunteers (red) and rectal adenocarcinoma patients (green). 36.5 and 19.2% are the scores of the component 1 and 2, respectively. (B) Loadings plot for components 1 and 2. (C) Cross validation showing the performance measures (prediction accuracy, R2, and Q2). *best values of Q2 (0.97). (D) The permutation test statistics (p < 5e−4). PLS score (T-score) explains Y and maximizes the relation between X and Y.
Figure 3Important metabolite ions selected on the basis of variable importance in projection (VIP) score. The colored boxes on the right indicate relative bin integrals for healthy volunteers and rectal adenocarcinoma patients. VIP score is a weighted sum of squares of the PLS-DA loadings taking into account the amount of explained Y-variation in each dimension.
Main classes of lipids with contrasting abundances identified in the plasma of rectal cancer patients.
| Lipid | Molecular formula | Lipid class | Tendency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 734.5685 | Phosphatidylcholine (PC) (32:0) | C40H80NO8P | Glycerophosphocholine | High |
| Phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) (35:0) | Glycerophosphoethanolamine | |||
| 756.554 | PC (31:3) | C42H78NO8P | Glycerophosphocholine | High |
| PE (34:3) | Glycerophosphoethanolamine | |||
| 792.5868 | PC (P-38:5) | C46H82NO7P | Glycerophosphocholine | High |
| PC (O-38:6) | ||||
| 820.5975 | PC (P-40:5) | C48H86NO7P | Glycerophosphocholine | High |
| PC (O-40:6) | ||||
| 478.3285 | Lisophosphatidylcholine (LPC) (P-16:1) | C24H48NO6P | Glycerophosphocholine | Low |
| 496.3395 | LPC (16:0) | C24H50NO7P | Glycerophosphocholine | Low |
| 506.3602 | LPC (P-18:1) | C26H52NO6P | Glycerophosphocholine | Low |
| 504.3447 | LPC (P-18:2) | C26H50NO6P | Glycerophosphocholine | Low |
| 524.371 | LPC (18:0) | C26H54NO7P | Glycerophosphocholine | Low |
.
.
Fatty acid (FA) composition (% total relative) of plasma total lipids in healthy volunteers (n = 18) and rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) patients in the different cancer stages.
| Fatty acids | Healthy volunteers ( | Stage 0 | Stages I/II ( | Stages III/IV ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16:0 | 27.33 ± 4.37 | 26.27 ± 4.14 | 28.67 ± 2.75 | 28.96 ± 2.64 |
| 18:0 | 7.68 ± 1.44 | 8.11 ± 0.89 | 7.39 ± 0.96 | 7.48 ± 1.12 |
| Σ SFA | 35.01 ± 5.81 | 34.37 ± 5.03 | 36.07 ± 3.71 | 36.44 ± 3.76 |
| 16:1 | 5.08 ± 0.79 | 4.21 ± 1.20 | 4.18 ± 1.45 | 4.25 ± 1.97 |
| 18:1 | 20.06 ± 3.36 | 19.73 ± 4.28 | 20.25 ± 4.38 | 21.29 ± 1.92 |
| Σ MUFA | 25.14 ± 4.15 | 23.93 ± 5.48 | 24.23 ± 5.83 | 25.54 ± 3.90 |
| 18:2 | 28.35 ± 5.66 | 27.08 ± 5.20 | 28.89 ± 5.97 | 25.82 ± 5.51 |
| 20:4 | 5.12 ± 1.01 | 6.26 ± 2.42 | 4.33 ± 0.72 | 6.04 ± 2.50 |
| Σ | 33.47 ± 6.67 | 33.33 ± 7.62 | 33.22 ± 6.69 | 31.85 ± 8.01 |
| 18:3 | 1.35 ± 1.38 | 1.91 ± 1.36 | 0.97 ± 0.64 | 0.91 ± 0.59 |
| 20:5 | 0.54 ± 0.42 | 0.60 ± 0.55 | 0.37 ± 0.23 | 0.30 ± 0.13 |
| 22:5 | 0.33 ± 0.19 | 0.49 ± 0.43 | 0.17 ± 0.10 | 0.19 ± 0.06 |
| 22:6 | 0.63 ± 0.28 | 0.79 ± 0.75 | 0.35 ± 0.12 | 0.49 ± 0.18 |
| Σ | 2.85 ± 2.27 | 3.79 ± 3.08 | 1.86 ± 1.09 | 1.88 ± 0.97 |
| Σ | 11.7 ± 8.4 | 11.5 ± 7.4 | 17.8 ± 9.2 | 16.9 ± 9.5 |
*.
.
SFA, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid.
Figure 4Malondialdehyde (A) and F2-isoprostane (B) levels of the healthy volunteers and rectal adenocarcinoma patients in the different cancer stages. *p < 0.05 compared to the healthy volunteers. #p < 0.05 compared to stage 0; ANOVA followed by Tukey test. 1. Healthy volunteers, 2. Stages 0, 3. Stages I/II, 4. Stages III/IV.