| Literature DB >> 29358231 |
Bin-Jie Xu1, Qing Chen1, Ting Zheng1, Yun-Feng Jiang1, Yuan-Yuan Qiao1, Zhen-Ru Guo1, Yong-Li Cao1, Yan Wang1, Ya-Zhou Zhang1, Lu-Juan Zong1, Jing Zhu1, Cai-Hong Liu1, Qian-Tao Jiang1, Xiu-Jin Lan1, Jian Ma1, Ji-Rui Wang1, You-Liang Zheng1, Yu-Ming Wei2, Peng-Fei Qi2.
Abstract
Spike density and processing quality are important traits in modern wheat production and are controlled by multiple gene loci. The associated genes have been intensively studied and new discoveries have been constantly reported during the past few decades. However, no gene playing a significant role in the development of these two traits has been identified. In the current study, a common wheat mutant with extremely compact spikes and good processing quality was isolated and characterized. A new allele (Qc1 ) of the Q gene (an important domestication gene) responsible for the mutant phenotype was cloned, and the molecular mechanism for the mutant phenotype was studied. Results revealed that Qc1 originated from a point mutation that interferes with the miRNA172-directed cleavage of Q transcripts, leading to its overexpression. It also reduces the longitudinal cell size of rachises, resulting in an increased spike density. Furthermore, Qc1 increases the number of vascular bundles, which suggests a higher efficiency in the transportation of assimilates in the spikes of the mutant than that of wild type. This accounts for the improved processing quality. The effects of Qc1 on spike density and wheat processing quality were confirmed by analyzing nine common wheat mutants possessing four different Qc alleles. These results deepen our understanding of the key roles of Q gene, and provide new insights for the potential application of Qc alleles in wheat quality breeding.Entities:
Keywords: bread-making quality; compact spike; mutant screen report; point mutation; protein content; wheat breeding
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29358231 PMCID: PMC5844298 DOI: 10.1534/g3.117.300562
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 1Phenotype of S-Cp1-1 and mapping of the Cp1 locus. (A) Plants of S-Cp1-1 (left) and WT (right) at GS29. (B) Plants of S-Cp1-1 (left) and WT (right) at GS59. (C) Spikes of S-Cp1-1 (left) and WT (right) at GS59 (D) Rachises of S-Cp1-1 (left) and WT (right) at GS59. The rachises between white arrows were used in Figure 6. (E) Stem and spike lengths of S-Cp1-1 and WT at GS90. Data are means ± SD (SD; n = 35). *** P < 0.01. (F) Mapping of the Cp1 locus. The BACs (bacterial artificial chromosomes) and genomic scaffolds were queried using a BLASTN algorithm in NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and aligned based on their relative positions and overlap. All of the BACs and scaffolds used are listed in Table S3 in File S1. Scale bar (A–D), 1 cm.
Comparison of processing quality parameters of S-Cp1-1 to its WT
| GPC (%; Dry Weight) | WGC (%) | Zeleny Sedimentation Value (ml) | Development Time (min) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014–2015 | 2015–2016 | 2014–2015 | 2015–2016 | 2014–2015 | 2015–2016 | 2014–2015 | 2015–2016 | |
| 19.72A | 17.90A | 50.60A | 41.95A | 63.05A | 45.87A | 7.11A | 3.23A | |
| WT | 14.00B | 11.49B | 34.83B | 20.09B | 36.83B | 20.09B | 2.46B | 1.41B |
| E | 242.28 | <0.01 | 221.15 | <0.01 | 51.67 | <0.01 | 295.41 | <0.01 |
| G | 1909.72 | <0.01 | 574.10 | <0.01 | 110.61 | <0.01 | 360.68 | <0.01 |
| G × E | 5.96 | 0.041 | 15.12 | <0.01 | 0.73 | 0.417 | 55.27 | <0.01 |
The seeds were harvested in two growing seasons, i.e., 2014–2015 and 2015–2016. “A” and “B” represent significance at P < 0.01. Significance was calculated by using t-test and LSD test. E, environment; G, genotype.
Figure 2Expression of Q measured by qRT-PCR. (A–D) Spikes of S-Cp1-1 (left) and WT (right) at GS22, GS24, GS29, and GS32, respectively. Scale bar, 0.1 cm (A and B) and 1 cm (C and D). (E) Relative expression levels of Q and Q in root, stem, and leaf at GS24. (F) Relative expression of Q and Q at GS24, GS29, and GS32. Error bars represent means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 6Contrasting cell morphology of the rachises of S-Cp1-1 and its WT at GS59. (A and B) The transverse sections of S-Cp1-1 (A) and WT (B). (C and D) The longitudinal sections of S-Cp-1 (C) and WT (D). (E and F) The cells in the vascular bundles of S-Cp1-1 (E) and WT (F). V, vascular bundles; Ph, phloem; Xy, xylem. Scale bars, 10 μm (A–D) and 0.1 μm (E and F).
Figure 3Genomic structure of Q and confirmation of miRNA172-directed regulation in the developing spike at GS24. (A) Genomic structure of the Q. The initiation and termination codons, exons (black rectangles), and introns (gray rectangles) are illustrated. The point mutations in the miRNA172-binding site of q, Q, and Q are indicated. (B) miRNA172 cleavage sites in the transcripts of Q and Q as determined by 5′ RACE.
Figure 4Molecular characterization of the four Q alleles. (A) Features of the spikes of S-Cp1-1, S-Cp1-2, R-Cp1-3, L-Cp2-1, M-Cp2-2, R-Cp2-3, R-Cp2-4, S-Cp3-1, R-Cp3-2, and R-Cp4-1 at GS70 (left to right; Table S1 in File S1). (B) Polymorphisms of the four Q alleles and their predicted amino acid substitutions.
Figure 5Q increases loaf volume. (A) Intact loaves of S-Cp1-1 and its WT. Scale bar, 1 cm. (B) Comparison of loaf volume of S-Cp1-1 to its WT. “***” above column indicates the significance at P < 0.01.
Effect of Q on grain protein content (dry weight) in two F2 populations
| GPC (%) | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.00A | 22.43A | |
| 14.56B | 17.19B | |
| 11.88C | 10.32C | |
| Population | 46.1 | <0.01 |
| Genotype | 1163.0 | <0.01 |
| P × G | 63.6 | <0.01 |
The seeds of 20 individual F2 plants were harvested for each of the lines with zero, one or two Q copies. “A,” “B” and “C” indicate significance at P < 0.01. Significance was calculated by using t-test and LSD test.