Literature DB >> 29357718

The cost-effectiveness of dulaglutide versus insulin glargine for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan.

Hitoshi Ishii1, Matthew Madin-Warburton2, Alena Strizek3, Lucy Thornton-Jones2, Shuichi Suzuki4.   

Abstract

AIMS: Dulaglutide is a new once weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist administered via a disposable auto-injection pen for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dulaglutide vs insulin glargine for the management of T2DM from a Japanese healthcare perspective, in accordance with recently approved Japanese Cost-Effectiveness Guidelines.
METHODS: The IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model (version 9) was used to estimate the long-term costs and effects of treatment with dulaglutide and insulin glargine. Direct comparative data from the Araki 2015 trial (NCT01584232) was used to inform the analysis. Costs associated with treatment and complications were derived from Japanese sources wherever possible and inflated to 2015 Japanese Yen (JPY). Utilities were based upon a European systematic review of diabetes utilities and adjusted for use in a Japanese population. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (OWSA and PSA) were conducted on all inputs and key modeling assumptions.
RESULTS: Dulaglutide 0.75 mg was associated with higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life years (LYs), and total costs, compared to insulin glargine, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 416,280 JPY/QALY gained. Treatment with dulaglutide increased the time alive and free from diabetes-related complications by 4 months. OWSA and PSA indicated that results were robust to plausible variations in input parameters and modeling assumptions. LIMITATIONS: Key limitations of this study are similar to other cost-utility analyses of diabetes, including the extrapolation of short-term clinical trial data into lifelong durations. In addition, due to the lack of robust published Japanese data, some values were derived from non-Japanese sources.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that dulaglutide 0.75 mg may be a cost-effective treatment alternative to insulin glargine for patients with T2DM in Japan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Japan; Type 2 diabetes; cost-effectiveness; dulaglutide; insulin glargine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29357718     DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1431918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  5 in total

1.  Cost Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists, and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dongzhe Hong; Lei Si; Minghuan Jiang; Hui Shao; Wai-Kit Ming; Yingnan Zhao; Yan Li; Lizheng Shi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Economic Evaluation of Dulaglutide vs Traditional Therapies: Implications of the Outcomes of the Rewind Study.

Authors:  Enrico Torre; Giacomo M Bruno; Sergio Di Matteo; Chiara Martinotti; Maria Chiara Valentino; Luigi C Bottaro; Giorgio L Colombo
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2020-04-08

3.  Cost-effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a real-world study and systematic review.

Authors:  Chen-Yi Yang; Ying-Ren Chen; Huang-Tz Ou; Shihchen Kuo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 9.951

4.  Clinical application of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in cardiovascular disease: lessons from recent clinical cardiovascular outcomes trials.

Authors:  Atsushi Tanaka; Koichi Node
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 9.951

5.  Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes who fail metformin monotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies.

Authors:  Bhavani Shankara Bagepally; Usa Chaikledkaew; Yogesh Krishnarao Gurav; Thunyarat Anothaisintawee; Sitaporn Youngkong; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Mark McEvoy; John Attia; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.