Literature DB >> 29356547

Exploring Biological and Geological Age-related Changes through Variations in Intra- and Intertooth Proteomes of Ancient Dentine.

Noemi Procopio1, Andrew T Chamberlain2, Michael Buckley1.   

Abstract

Proteomic analyses are becoming more widely used in archeology not only due to the greater preservation of proteins in ancient specimens than DNA but also because they can offer different information, particularly relating to compositional preservation and potentially a means to estimate biological and geological age. However, it remains unclear to what extent different burial environments impact these aspects of proteome decay. Teeth have to date been much less studied than bone but are ideal to explore how proteins decay with time due to the negligible turnover that occurs in dentine relative to bone. We investigated the proteome variability and deamidation levels of different sections of molar teeth from archeological bovine mandibles as well as their mandibular bone. We obtained a greater yield of proteins from the crown of the teeth but did not find differences between the different molars analyzed within each mandible. We also obtained the best variety of protein from a well-preserved mandible that was not the youngest one in terms of chronological age, showing the influence of the preservation conditions on the final proteomic outcome. Intriguingly, we also noticed an increase in abundance levels of fetuin-A in biologically younger mandibles as reported previously, but the opposite trend in tooth dentine. Interestingly, we observed higher glutamine deamidation levels in teeth from the geologically oldest mandible despite it being the biologically youngest specimen, showing that the archeological age strongly impacts on the level of deamidations observed, much more so than biological aging. This indicates that the glutamine deamidation ratio of selected peptides may act as a good predictor of the relative geochronological age of archeological specimens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ancient bone proteome; ancient dentine proteome; biological aging; deamidations; fetuin-A; geological aging; shotgun proteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29356547     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  6 in total

Review 1.  Paleoproteomics.

Authors:  Christina Warinner; Kristine Korzow Richter; Matthew J Collins
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 72.087

2.  Molecular insights into an ancient form of Paget's disease of bone.

Authors:  Barry Shaw; Carla L Burrell; Darrell Green; Ana Navarro-Martinez; Daniel Scott; Anna Daroszewska; Rob van 't Hof; Lynn Smith; Frank Hargrave; Sharad Mistry; Andrew Bottrill; Benedikt M Kessler; Roman Fischer; Archana Singh; Tamas Dalmay; William D Fraser; Kirstin Henneberger; Turi King; Silvia Gonzalez; Robert Layfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Ancient protein analysis in archaeology.

Authors:  Jessica Hendy
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 4.  Postmortem Protein Degradation as a Tool to Estimate the PMI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Angela Zissler; Walter Stoiber; Peter Steinbacher; Janine Geissenberger; Fabio C Monticelli; Stefan Pittner
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26

5.  Proteome Variation with Collagen Yield in Ancient Bone.

Authors:  Noemi Procopio; Rachel J A Hopkins; Virginia L Harvey; Michael Buckley
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Human Bone Proteomes before and after Decomposition: Investigating the Effects of Biological Variation and Taphonomic Alteration on Bone Protein Profiles and the Implications for Forensic Proteomics.

Authors:  Hayley L Mickleburgh; Edward C Schwalbe; Andrea Bonicelli; Haruka Mizukami; Federica Sellitto; Sefora Starace; Daniel J Wescott; David O Carter; Noemi Procopio
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.466

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.