Marc W Deyell1, Christian Steinberg2, Steve Doucette3, Ratika Parkash3, Isabelle Nault2, Chris Gray3, Vidal Essebag4, Martin Gardner3, Laurence D Sterns5, Jeff S Healey6, Tomasz Hruczkowski7, Lena Rivard8, Peter Leong-Sit9, Pablo B Nery10, John L Sapp3. 1. Heart Rhythm Services, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 2. Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec, Universite Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. 3. Department of Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. 4. McGill University Health Centre and Hôpital Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 5. Royal Jubilee Hospital, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. 6. Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 7. Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 8. Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 9. Heart Rhythm Service, University Hospital, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. 10. University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In patients with ischemic heart disease and ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to high doseamiodarone, the two most common therapeutic options are adjunctive mexiletine therapy or catheter ablation. There are little existing data on the efficacy of these strategies. We examined the relative efficacy of adjunctive mexiletine and catheter ablation among patients enrolled in the VANISH trial. METHODS:All subjects enrolled in the VANISH trial who had VT refractory to high dose (≥ 300 mg daily) amiodarone at baseline were included. Per protocol, subjects randomized to escalated drug therapy received adjunctive mexiletine. RESULTS:Nineteen of the 259 patients were receiving high-doseamiodarone at baseline and 11 were randomized to escalated therapy with mexiletine and 8 to ablation. The adjunctive mexiletine group had a higher rate of the primary composite outcome (death, VT storm, or appropriate shock) in comparison to catheter ablation (HR 6.87 [2.08-22.8]). Over 90% of the patients in the adjunctive mexiletine/group experienced a primary endpoint during a median 9.2 months' follow-up. There was no difference in the rate of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS:Mexiletine has limited efficacy in the treatment of recurrent VT despite high-dose amiodarone therapy, in patients with ischemic heart disease. Catheter ablation is a superior strategy in this population.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: In patients with ischemic heart disease and ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to high dose amiodarone, the two most common therapeutic options are adjunctive mexiletine therapy or catheter ablation. There are little existing data on the efficacy of these strategies. We examined the relative efficacy of adjunctive mexiletine and catheter ablation among patients enrolled in the VANISH trial. METHODS: All subjects enrolled in the VANISH trial who had VT refractory to high dose (≥ 300 mg daily) amiodarone at baseline were included. Per protocol, subjects randomized to escalated drug therapy received adjunctive mexiletine. RESULTS: Nineteen of the 259 patients were receiving high-dose amiodarone at baseline and 11 were randomized to escalated therapy with mexiletine and 8 to ablation. The adjunctive mexiletine group had a higher rate of the primary composite outcome (death, VT storm, or appropriate shock) in comparison to catheter ablation (HR 6.87 [2.08-22.8]). Over 90% of the patients in the adjunctive mexiletine/group experienced a primary endpoint during a median 9.2 months' follow-up. There was no difference in the rate of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS:Mexiletine has limited efficacy in the treatment of recurrent VT despite high-dose amiodarone therapy, in patients with ischemic heart disease. Catheter ablation is a superior strategy in this population.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Justin Lee; Matthew Bates; Ewen Shepherd; Stephen Riley; Michael Henshaw; Peter Metherall; Jim Daniel; Alison Blower; David Scoones; Michele Wilkinson; Neil Richmond; Clifford Robinson; Phillip Cuculich; Geoffrey Hugo; Neil Seller; Ruth McStay; Nicholas Child; Andrew Thornley; Nicholas Kelland; Philip Atherton; Clive Peedell; Matthew Hatton Journal: Open Heart Date: 2021-11