Literature DB >> 29355746

Bone remodelling in vitro: Where are we headed?: -A review on the current understanding of physiological bone remodelling and inflammation and the strategies for testing biomaterials in vitro.

Nupur Kohli1, Sonia Ho2, Stuart J Brown2, Prasad Sawadkar2, Vaibhav Sharma2, Martyn Snow3, Elena García-Gareta2.   

Abstract

Bone remodelling is a dynamic process required for the maintenance of bone architecture in response to the changing mechanical needs. It is also a vital process during the repair of bone tissue following injury. Clinical intervention in terms of autografting or allografting is often required to heal bone injuries where physiological healing fails. The use of biomaterials as alternatives to autografts and allografts has spurred a significant research interest into further development of biomaterials for better clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, many biomaterials fail to make it to the clinic or fail after implantation due to the inconsistencies observed between in vitro and in vivo studies. It is therefore important to mimic the in vivo situation as closely as possible in an in vitro setting for testing biomaterials. The current in vitro models focus mostly on investigating the behaviour of osteoblast progenitors with the biomaterial under development as well as assessing the behaviour of osteoclasts, endothelial cells etc. However, the sequence of events that take place during bone healing or remodelling are not incorporated into the current in vitro models. This review highlights our current understanding of the physiological bone remodelling and the bone healing process followed by strategies to incorporate both the physiological and pathophysiological events into an in vitro environment. Here, we propose three strategies for the assessment of biomaterials for bone, which includes; (1) testing biomaterials in the presence of immune cells, (2) testing biomaterials for osteogenesis, and (3) testing biomaterials in the presence of osteoclasts followed by osteoblasts to recapitulate the physiological events of bone resorption prior to bone formation. The focus of this review is to discuss the third strategy in details as the first two strategies are currently incorporated into a majority of in vitro experiments.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone healing; Bone remodelling; In vitro models

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29355746     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  27 in total

1.  Rational design of hydrogels to enhance osteogenic potential.

Authors:  Soyon Kim; Min Lee
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 9.811

2.  Recent Advances in Biomaterials for the Treatment of Bone Defects.

Authors:  Le-Yi Zhang; Qing Bi; Chen Zhao; Jin-Yang Chen; Mao-Hua Cai; Xiao-Yi Chen
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 3.  Bioprinting: From Tissue and Organ Development to in Vitro Models.

Authors:  Carlos Mota; Sandra Camarero-Espinosa; Matthew B Baker; Paul Wieringa; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Combined Approach to Treat Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws.

Authors:  Elisabetta Merigo; Luigi Cella; Aldo Oppici; Maria Cristina Arbasi; Fabio Clini; Matteo Fontana; Carlo Fornaini
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-20

5.  Dendritic cell biocompatibility of ether-based urethane films.

Authors:  Ingrid Safina; Karrer M Alghazali; Luke Childress; Christopher Griffin; Ahmed Hashoosh; Ganesh Kannarpady; Fumiya Watanabe; Shawn E Bourdo; Ruud P M Dings; Alexandru S Biris; Kieng Bao Vang
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.446

6.  In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Immune Response of Jellyfish Collagen Scaffolds and its Suitability for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Iris Flaig; Milena Radenković; Stevo Najman; Annica Pröhl; Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats.

Authors:  Patricia Brassolatti; Paulo Sérgio Bossini; Ana Laura Martins de Andrade; Genoveva Lourdes Flores Luna; Juliana Virginio da Silva; Luciana Almeida-Lopes; Marcos Aurélio Napolitano; Lucimar Retto da Silva de Avó; Ângela Merice de Oliveira Leal; Fernanda de Freitas Anibal
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 1.388

Review 8.  In vitro Models of Bone Remodelling and Associated Disorders.

Authors:  Robert Owen; Gwendolen C Reilly
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-11

9.  Zinc-Modified Sulfonated Polyetheretherketone Surface with Immunomodulatory Function for Guiding Cell Fate and Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Jinhua Li; Mengqi Cheng; Qiaojie Wang; Kelvin W K Yeung; Paul K Chu; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 16.806

10.  Hierarchical Characterization and Nanomechanical Assessment of Biomimetic Scaffolds Mimicking Lamellar Bone via Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation.

Authors:  Brian Wingender; Yongliang Ni; Yifan Zhang; Curtis Taylor; Laurie Gower
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-22       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.