Di Zhao1, Eliseo Guallar1, Janice V Bowie2, Bonnielin Swenor3, Prateek Gajwani4, Natasha Kanwar4, David S Friedman5. 1. Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Departments of Epidemiology and Medicine, and Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: david.friedman@jhu.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate factors associated with attendance to follow-up ophthalmic care, and to assess the impact of strategies to improve follow-up. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: This is an ongoing study to develop an eye screening paradigm, focusing on African Americans ≥50 years of age at multiple urban community sites in Baltimore, Maryland. Several strategies were employed aiming to increase follow-up attendance rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between demographic, medical, and ocular factors with follow-up rate. RESULTS: The total number of referred patients presenting for a free eye examination (attendance rate) during the first phase, during the second phase, and overall was 686 (55.0%), 199 (63.8%), and 885 (57.0%), respectively. In fully adjusted models, the odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) for attending the follow-up visit was 1.82 (1.19, 2.79) for screening in second phase vs first phase, 0.62 (0.39, 0.99) for screening sites that were 3 to <5 miles vs <1 mile from the hospital, 1.70 (1.12, 2.59) in patients with body mass index ≥ 30 vs < 25 kg/m2, 2.03 (1.28, 3.21) in patients with presenting visual acuity < 20/40 vs ≥ 20/40, and 2.32 (1.24, 4.34) for patients with an abnormal vs normal macula. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity, short distance between screening sites and hospital, poor presenting visual acuity in the better eye, and an abnormal macula on fundus photography were associated with increased follow-up rate. Implementation of a combination of strategies effectively increased the follow-up rate. Wider adoption of these strategies in other screening programs has the potential to reduce the burden of visual impairment.
PURPOSE: To evaluate factors associated with attendance to follow-up ophthalmic care, and to assess the impact of strategies to improve follow-up. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: This is an ongoing study to develop an eye screening paradigm, focusing on African Americans ≥50 years of age at multiple urban community sites in Baltimore, Maryland. Several strategies were employed aiming to increase follow-up attendance rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between demographic, medical, and ocular factors with follow-up rate. RESULTS: The total number of referred patients presenting for a free eye examination (attendance rate) during the first phase, during the second phase, and overall was 686 (55.0%), 199 (63.8%), and 885 (57.0%), respectively. In fully adjusted models, the odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) for attending the follow-up visit was 1.82 (1.19, 2.79) for screening in second phase vs first phase, 0.62 (0.39, 0.99) for screening sites that were 3 to <5 miles vs <1 mile from the hospital, 1.70 (1.12, 2.59) in patients with body mass index ≥ 30 vs < 25 kg/m2, 2.03 (1.28, 3.21) in patients with presenting visual acuity < 20/40 vs ≥ 20/40, and 2.32 (1.24, 4.34) for patients with an abnormal vs normal macula. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity, short distance between screening sites and hospital, poor presenting visual acuity in the better eye, and an abnormal macula on fundus photography were associated with increased follow-up rate. Implementation of a combination of strategies effectively increased the follow-up rate. Wider adoption of these strategies in other screening programs has the potential to reduce the burden of visual impairment.
Authors: Benjamin E Leiby; Sarah E Hegarty; Tingting Zhan; Jonathan S Myers; L Jay Katz; Julia A Haller; Michael Waisbourd; Christine Burns; Meskerem Divers; Jeanne Molineaux; Jeffrey Henderer; Charles Brodowski; Lisa A Hark Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Patrick C Staropoli; Richard K Lee; Zachary A Kroger; Karina Somohano; Matthew Feldman; Jennifer D Verriotto; Adam Aldahan; Potyra R Rosa; William J Feuer; D Diane Zheng; David J Lee; Byron L Lam Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2021-12-29
Authors: Calvin C Robbins; Sidrah Anjum; Amer Mosa Alwreikat; Michael Lee Cooper; Paul R Cotran; Shiyoung Roh; David J Ramsey Journal: Ophthalmol Sci Date: 2021-09-22