Literature DB >> 29354464

Arthroscopic Arthrodesis of the Lesser Ray Tarsometatarsal Joints: 2-Portal Technique.

Tun Hing Lui1.   

Abstract

Tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) destruction of the tarsometatarsal articulation of the lesser rays is most commonly due to midfoot Charcot neuroarthropathy. Tarsometatarsal arthrodesis is indicated when conservative management cannot relieve the symptoms. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe a minimally invasive approach of arthroscopic arthrodesis of the destructed lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints. The arthroscopic procedure is performed through the lateral and P1-2 Lisfranc portals. It has the advantages of better cosmesis, less wound complication, less bone resection, and more thorough joint debridement. However, it is contraindicated if there is associated significant foot deformity or shortening of the lesser foot rays.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29354464      PMCID: PMC5709659          DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthrosc Tech        ISSN: 2212-6287


Tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) destruction of the tarsometatarsal articulation of the lesser rays can be a disabling condition. It is most commonly due to midfoot Charcot neuroarthropathy. Conservative treatments include rocker bottom shoes, orthoses, and analgesics. Tarsometatarsal arthrodesis is indicated when conservative management cannot relieve the symptoms. Classically, this is performed as an open procedure with extensive incisions and soft tissue dissection.2, 4, 5, 6, 7 Arthroscopic Lisfranc arthrodesis has been reported and involves 6 portals: medial and lateral portals together with 4 junctional portals.8, 9, 10, 11, 12 The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe a minimally invasive approach of arthroscopic arthrodesis of the tarsometatarsal joints of the lesser rays through 2 portals. It is indicated if there is symptomatic tarsometatarsal destruction of the lesser rays. It is contraindicated if there is significant bone loss requiring strut graft reconstruction. It is also contraindicated if the bone is soft and cannot be stably fixed with screws or open reduction is required for deformity correction (Table 1).
Table 1

Indications and Contraindications of Arthroscopic Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis: 2-Portal Technique

IndicationsContraindications
1. It is indicated if there is symptomatic tarsometatarsal destruction of the lesser rays1. It is contraindicated if there is significant bone loss requiring strut graft reconstruction
2. It is contraindicated if the bone is soft and cannot be stably fixed with screws
3. It is contraindicated if open reduction is required for deformity correction
Indications and Contraindications of Arthroscopic Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis: 2-Portal Technique

Technique

Preoperative Planning and Patient Positioning

Standard dorsoplantar, oblique, and lateral radiographs of the foot are important to confirm the surgical indication (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints of the left foot. The patient is in the supine position. Standing dorsoplantar (A) and lateral (B) radiographs of the left foot of the illustrated case show destruction of the second to fourth tarsometatarsal joints (arrows).

Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints of the left foot. The patient is in the supine position. Standing dorsoplantar (A) and lateral (B) radiographs of the left foot of the illustrated case show destruction of the second to fourth tarsometatarsal joints (arrows). The patient is in the supine position with the legs spread. A thigh tourniquet (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) is applied to provide a bloodless operative field. A 2.7-mm 30° arthroscope (Henke Sass Wolf, Tuttlingen, Germany) is used for this procedure. Fluid inflow is by gravity and no arthropump is used.

Portal Placement

This procedure is performed through the L1-2 and lateral tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) portals. The L1-2 portal is located at the medial side of the second tarsometatarsal articulation and the lateral portal is located at the lateral side of the fifth metatarsocuboid articulation (Fig 2). Three- to four-millimeter skin incisions are made at the portal sites and the subcutaneous tissue is bluntly dissected to the joint by a hemostat. The joint capsule is perforated by the tip of the hemostat. Sometimes, the capsule is fibrotic and thick and should be incised open.
Fig 2

Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints of the left foot. The patient is in the supine position. This procedure is performed through the L1-2 and lateral tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) portals. The L1-2 portal is located at the medial side of the second tarsometatarsal articulation and the lateral portal is located at the lateral side of the fifth metatarsocuboid articulation. (Cu, cuboid bone; IC, intermediate cuneiform bone; LP, lateral portal; MT2, second metatarsal; MT5, fifth metatarsal; P12, P1-2 portal.)

Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints of the left foot. The patient is in the supine position. This procedure is performed through the L1-2 and lateral tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) portals. The L1-2 portal is located at the medial side of the second tarsometatarsal articulation and the lateral portal is located at the lateral side of the fifth metatarsocuboid articulation. (Cu, cuboid bone; IC, intermediate cuneiform bone; LP, lateral portal; MT2, second metatarsal; MT5, fifth metatarsal; P12, P1-2 portal.)

Debridement of the Lateral Half of the Tarsometatarsal Joint of the Lesser Rays

The P1-2 portal is the viewing portal and the lateral portal is the working portal. Usually, the destroyed joint allows direct insertion of the arthroscope and arthroscopic shaver (Dyonics, Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) into the gap between the articular surfaces. If not, the arthroscope and arthroscopic instrument can be inserted into the dorsal gutter first and the dorsal soft tissue is stripped from the bone to increase the space between the articular surfaces for subsequent joint debridement. The lateral half of the joint is debrided down to the plantar capsule until the bone surfaces of the joint can be seen (Fig 3). The position of the arthroscopic instrument is regularly checked under fluoroscopy because there is no clear arthroscopic landmark in the destructed joint.
Fig 3

Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints of the left foot. The patient is in the supine position. (A) The P1-2 portal is the viewing portal and the lateral portal is the working portal. (B) The lateral half of the joint is debrided. (AS, arthroscopic shaver; LP, lateral portal; MT, metatarsal bone; P12, P1-2 portal; T, tarsal bone.)

Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints of the left foot. The patient is in the supine position. (A) The P1-2 portal is the viewing portal and the lateral portal is the working portal. (B) The lateral half of the joint is debrided. (AS, arthroscopic shaver; LP, lateral portal; MT, metatarsal bone; P12, P1-2 portal; T, tarsal bone.)

Debridement of the Medial Half of the Tarsometatarsal Joint of the Lesser Rays

The lateral portal is the viewing portal and the P1-2 portal is the working portal. The medial half of the joint is debrided down to the plantar capsule by means of the arthroscopic shaver until the bone surfaces of the joint can be seen (Fig 4).
Fig 4

Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints of the left foot. The patient is in the supine position. (A) The lateral portal is the viewing portal and the P1-2 portal is the working portal. (B) The medial half of the joint is debrided. (AS, arthroscopic shaver; LP, lateral portal; MT, metatarsal bone; P12, P1-2 portal; T, tarsal bone.)

Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints of the left foot. The patient is in the supine position. (A) The lateral portal is the viewing portal and the P1-2 portal is the working portal. (B) The medial half of the joint is debrided. (AS, arthroscopic shaver; LP, lateral portal; MT, metatarsal bone; P12, P1-2 portal; T, tarsal bone.)

Preparation of the Fusion Surfaces

Microfracture of bone surfaces of both tarsal and metatarsal bones is performed with an arthroscopic awl (Acufex, Smith & Nephew) via the lateral and P1-2 portals with the arthroscope in the opposite portal (Fig 5).
Fig 5

Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints of the left foot. The patient is in the supine position. (A) The lateral portal is the viewing portal and the P1-2 portal is the working portal. (B) Microfracture of tarsal bone surface is performed with an arthroscopic awl. (AW, arthroscopic awl; LP, lateral portal; P12, P1-2 portal; T, tarsal bone.)

Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints of the left foot. The patient is in the supine position. (A) The lateral portal is the viewing portal and the P1-2 portal is the working portal. (B) Microfracture of tarsal bone surface is performed with an arthroscopic awl. (AW, arthroscopic awl; LP, lateral portal; P12, P1-2 portal; T, tarsal bone.)

Positioning of the Lesser Ray Tarsometatarsal Joints and Screw Fixation of the Fusion Sites

The joint is put into a desirable position especially to avoid excessive pressure over the lateral column and compressed manually. It is transfixed with 4.0-mm cannulated screws (Synthes, West Chester, PA) across each articulation of the lesser rays (Fig 6, Video 1, Table 2). The foot is immobilized in a short leg cast for 12 to 16 weeks depending on the underlying pathology. Non-weight-bearing is advised during this period.
Fig 6

Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints of the left foot. The patient is in the supine position. (A) The portals and screw insertion wounds are closed with simple sutures. (B) Dorsoplantar radiograph shows the second to fifth tarsometatarsal joints transfixed with screws. (C) Lateral radiograph shows the correction of the midfoot deformity. (LP, lateral portal; P12, P1-2 portal; SI, screw insertion wounds.)

Table 2

Pearls and Pitfalls of Arthroscopic Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis: 2-Portal Technique

PearlsPitfalls
1. The position of the arthroscopic instrument is regularly checked under fluoroscopy because there is no clear arthroscopic landmark in the destructed joint1. The patient should be compliant to the prolonged cast immobilization and strict non-weight-bearing
2. Joint debridement should be completed down to the plantar capsule2. If there is difficulty in accessing some part of the joint, an additional Lisfranc portal should be established
3. The midfoot should be fixed in a slightly supinated position to avoid excessive pressure over the lateral column
Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints of the left foot. The patient is in the supine position. (A) The portals and screw insertion wounds are closed with simple sutures. (B) Dorsoplantar radiograph shows the second to fifth tarsometatarsal joints transfixed with screws. (C) Lateral radiograph shows the correction of the midfoot deformity. (LP, lateral portal; P12, P1-2 portal; SI, screw insertion wounds.) Pearls and Pitfalls of Arthroscopic Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis: 2-Portal Technique Advantages and Risks of Arthroscopic Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis: 2-Portal Technique

Discussion

Maintaining the mobility of the fourth and fifth tarsometatarsal joints has been reported to be important in arthrodesis of the tarsometatarsal joint. However, fusion of the lateral column can be necessary for correction of painful or unstable midfoot destruction.3, 5, 13 This reported 2-portal technique is feasible because the following prerequisites are fulfilled: The second to fifth tarsometatarsal joints share a common capsular compartment. The erosive arthropathy eliminates the stepping at the second tarsometatarsal joint making the lesser ray tarsometatarsal joints at the same level. The destructed joint is spacious enough to allow insertion of the arthroscopic instruments into the joint space throughout its span. The advantages of this minimally invasive approach include better cosmesis, less soft tissue dissection, low risk of wound complication, minimal bone resection, minimal shortening of the involved foot rays, and more thorough debridement of deep part of the joints under arthroscopic visualization. The structures at risk include the superficial and deep peroneal nerves, dorsalis pedis artery. Other complications of this procedure include infection, nonunion, malunion, and implant failure. Metatarsalgia may be encountered if positioning of the metatarsal heads at the time of fusion is not properly assessed (Table 3).
Table 3

Advantages and Risks of Arthroscopic Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis: 2-Portal Technique

AdvantagesRisks
1. Less wound complication1. Injury to the superficial peroneal nerve
2. Less soft tissue trauma2. Injury to the deep peroneal nerve
3. Better cosmesis3. Injury to the dorsalis pedis artery
4. Less bone resection and less shortening of the foot rays4. Malunion and metatarsalgia
5. More thorough debridement of the deep part of the joints under arthroscopic visualization5. Nonunion
6. Implant failure
  13 in total

1.  Arthroscopic Lysis of Arthrofibrosis of the Fifth Tarsometatarsal Joint.

Authors:  Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-11-16

2.  Arthroscopic Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-11-14

3.  Lateral foot pain following open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture of the fifth metatarsal tubercle: treated by arthroscopic arthrolysis and endoscopic tenolysis.

Authors:  Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-17

4.  Tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis with trephine joint resection and dowel calcaneal bone graft.

Authors:  Christopher J Withey; Anthony L Murphy; Rebecca Horner
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 1.286

5.  Lisfranc arthrodesis for chronic pain: a cannulated screw technique.

Authors:  J R Treadwell; M D Kahn
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.286

6.  Arthroscopic tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) arthrodesis.

Authors:  Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  [Corrective tarsometatarsal arthrodesis for malunion after fracture-dislocation].

Authors:  S Rammelt; W Schneiders; H Zwipp
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Intramedullary foot fixation for midfoot Charcot neuroarthropathy.

Authors:  Bradley M Lamm; Noman A Siddiqui; Ajitha K Nair; Guido LaPorta
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.286

Review 9.  Arthroscopy and endoscopy of the foot and ankle: indications for new techniques.

Authors:  Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Arthrodesis of the fourth and fifth tarsometatarsal joints of the midfoot.

Authors:  Steven M Raikin; Lew C Schon
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.