| Literature DB >> 29354242 |
Hye Ran Park1, Sukh Que Park1, Jae Hyun Kim2, Jae Chan Hwang3, Gwang Soo Lee1, Jae-Chil Chang1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In respect of the health and safety of the public, universal access to health care is an issue of the greatest importance. The geographic distribution of doctors is one of the important factors contributing to access to health care. The aim of this study is to assess the imbalances in the geographic distribution of neurosurgeons across Korea.Entities:
Keywords: Geographic mapping; Health manpower; Hospital distribution systems; Neurosurgeons
Year: 2017 PMID: 29354242 PMCID: PMC5769849 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0303.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Neurosurg Soc ISSN: 1225-8245
Ratio of doctors and neurosurgeons per 1000 population by location, 2009–2015
| 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Doctor ratio | Neurosurgeon ratio | Doctor ratio | Neurosurgeon ratio | Doctor ratio | Neurosurgeon ratio | Doctor ratio | Neurosurgeon ratio | Doctor ratio | Neurosurgeon ratio | Doctor ratio | Neurosurgeon ratio | Doctor ratio | Neurosurgeon ratio | |
| Seoul | 2.27 | 0.0450 | 2.37 | 0.0462 | 2.42 | 0.0488 | 2.48 | 0.0519 | 2.67 | 0.0540 | 2.72 | 0.0548 | 2.77 | 0.0575 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Busan | 1.75 | 0.0421 | 1.83 | 0.0446 | 1.91 | 0.0473 | 1.96 | 0.0475 | 2.03 | 0.0499 | 2.09 | 0.0534 | 2.15 | 0.0544 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Daegu | 1.88 | 0.0514 | 1.90 | 0.0526 | 1.93 | 0.0554 | 2.00 | 0.0575 | 2.04 | 0.0576 | 2.08 | 0.0582 | 2.14 | 0.0615 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Incheon | 1.24 | 0.0350 | 1.23 | 0.0373 | 1.29 | 0.0386 | 1.31 | 0.0380 | 1.37 | 0.0396 | 1.44 | 0.0434 | 1.49 | 0.0441 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Gwangju | 1.86 | 0.0579 | 1.97 | 0.0626 | 2.04 | 0.0629 | 2.06 | 0.0667 | 2.11 | 0.0679 | 2.16 | 0.0657 | 2.24 | 0.0734 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Daejeon | 1.98 | 0.0505 | 1.98 | 0.0545 | 2.00 | 0.0534 | 2.09 | 0.0512 | 2.12 | 0.0515 | 2.16 | 0.0542 | 2.24 | 0.0579 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ulsan | 1.19 | 0.0386 | 1.19 | 0.0391 | 1.25 | 0.0387 | 1.26 | 0.0392 | 1.30 | 0.0398 | 1.32 | 0.0386 | 1.39 | 0.0409 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Sejong | 0.76 | 0.0442 | 0.79 | 0.0409 | 0.79 | 0.0384 | 0.75 | 0.0285 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Gyeonggi | 1.25 | 0.0307 | 1.27 | 0.0322 | 1.32 | 0.0343 | 1.35 | 0.0357 | 1.40 | 0.0386 | 1.42 | 0.0408 | 1.45 | 0.0410 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Gangwon | 1.47 | 0.0449 | 1.51 | 0.0471 | 1.50 | 0.0469 | 1.53 | 0.0474 | 1.56 | 0.0473 | 1.60 | 0.0512 | 1.63 | 0.0536 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Chungbuk | 1.30 | 0.0478 | 1.32 | 0.0484 | 1.35 | 0.0473 | 1.35 | 0.0485 | 1.39 | 0.0521 | 1.42 | 0.0488 | 1.46 | 0.0486 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Chungnam | 1.26 | 0.0329 | 1.27 | 0.0323 | 1.29 | 0.0343 | 1.32 | 0.0335 | 1.35 | 0.0347 | 1.38 | 0.0359 | 1.40 | 0.0380 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Jeonbuk | 1.64 | 0.0431 | 1.65 | 0.0455 | 1.67 | 0.0448 | 1.68 | 0.0443 | 1.75 | 0.0481 | 1.79 | 0.0492 | 1.86 | 0.0508 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Jeonnam | 1.37 | 0.0382 | 1.40 | 0.0407 | 1.42 | 0.0434 | 1.46 | 0.0429 | 1.50 | 0.0477 | 1.51 | 0.0504 | 1.54 | 0.0503 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Gyeongbuk | 1.13 | 0.0352 | 1.15 | 0.0372 | 1.18 | 0.0411 | 1.20 | 0.0404 | 1.25 | 0.0430 | 1.28 | 0.0433 | 1.27 | 0.0444 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Gyeongnam | 1.27 | 0.0431 | 1.30 | 0.0438 | 1.32 | 0.0444 | 1.35 | 0.0449 | 1.38 | 0.0450 | 1.43 | 0.0472 | 1.46 | 0.0484 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Jeju | 1.35 | 0.0409 | 1.41 | 0.0350 | 1.44 | 0.0399 | 1.48 | 0.0463 | 1.58 | 0.0522 | 1.58 | 0.0527 | 1.64 | 0.0512 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Total | 1.59 | 0.0402 | 1.63 | 0.0417 | 1.67 | 0.0435 | 1.70 | 0.0446 | 1.77 | 0.0467 | 1.81 | 0.0482 | 1.85 | 0.0496 |
Sejong city was created as a special administrative distinct from parts of south and north Chungcheong provinces
Density of neurosurgeons according to country characteristics
| Area | Neurosurgeon density | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |
| Metropolitan cities | 4.50/1037 | 4.68/1092 | 4.87/1136 | 5.03/1175 | 5.19/1212 | 5.33/1244 | 5.57/1299 |
| Non-metropolitan cities | 3.94/875 | 3.95/919 | 4.10/963 | 4.23/1003 | 4.49/1073 | 4.65/1126 | 4.70/1148 |
| Rural | 2.40/90 | 2.55/96 | 2.93/110 | 2.56/96 | 2.75/103 | 2.75/103 | 2.93/110 |
| Total | 4.02/2002 | 4.17/2107 | 4.35/2209 | 4.46/2274 | 4.67/2388 | 4.82/2473 | 4.96/2557 |
Neurosurgeon density is defined as number of neurosurgeons/100000 populations
Fig. 1Color map representing the geographic distribution of neurosurgeon number (A) and density (B) in 2009 and 2015.
Relative value of neurosurgeon density according to country characteristics
| Year | Difference of neurosurgeon density | Relative ratio of neurosurgeon density | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Metropolitan/non-metropolitan cities | Metropolitan/rural | Non-metropolitan cities/rural | Metropolitan/non-metropolitan cities | Metropolitan/rural | Non-metropolitan cities/rural | |
| 2009 | 0.56 | 2.10 | 1.54 | 1.14 | 1.88 | 1.64 |
|
| ||||||
| 2010 | 0.73 | 2.13 | 1.4 | 1.18 | 1.84 | 1.55 |
|
| ||||||
| 2011 | 0.77 | 1.94 | 1.17 | 1.19 | 1.66 | 1.40 |
|
| ||||||
| 2012 | 0.80 | 2.47 | 1.67 | 1.19 | 1.96 | 1.65 |
|
| ||||||
| 2013 | 0.70 | 2.63 | 1.93 | 1.16 | 2.03 | 1.75 |
|
| ||||||
| 2014 | 0.68 | 2.58 | 1.9 | 1.15 | 1.94 | 1.69 |
|
| ||||||
| 2015 | 0.87 | 2.64 | 1.77 | 1.19 | 1.90 | 1.60 |
Repeated measures ANOVA results of the relationship between country unit characteristics and year, and neurosurgeon density
| Parameters | Type III sum of squares | Mean square | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country characteristics | 732.572 | 366.286 | 66.476 | 0.000 |
| Year | 15.382 | 2.564 | 0.465 | 0.834 |
| Error | 6132.676 | 5.510 | ||
| Total | 20501.136 | |||
| Corrected total | 6935.858 |
R squared=0.116 (adjusted R squared=0.100). ANOVA: analysis of variance
Fig. 2Color map representing the neurosurgeon density in 2015 by region.
Geographical distribution of hospitals by size
| 2009 | 2015 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| Tertiary general hospital | General hospital | Hospital | Clinic | Tertiary general hospital | General hospital | Hospital | Clinic | |
| Seoul | 17 | 42 | 232 | 7142 | 14 | 42 | 218 | 7802 |
|
| ||||||||
| Busan | 4 | 22 | 200 | 2065 | 4 | 24 | 130 | 2198 |
|
| ||||||||
| Daegu | 4 | 7 | 136 | 1460 | 4 | 8 | 114 | 1615 |
|
| ||||||||
| Incheon | 2 | 12 | 85 | 1313 | 3 | 16 | 55 | 1444 |
|
| ||||||||
| Gwangju | 2 | 17 | 66 | 826 | 2 | 20 | 75 | 893 |
|
| ||||||||
| Daejeon | 2 | 6 | 68 | 964 | 1 | 9 | 38 | 1026 |
|
| ||||||||
| Ulsan | 0 | 4 | 64 | 516 | 1 | 6 | 40 | 574 |
|
| ||||||||
| Sejong | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 |
|
| ||||||||
| Gyeonggi | 5 | 48 | 383 | 5470 | 5 | 53 | 288 | 6159 |
|
| ||||||||
| Gangwon | 2 | 14 | 58 | 660 | 1 | 14 | 49 | 717 |
|
| ||||||||
| Chungbuk | 1 | 9 | 63 | 764 | 1 | 11 | 40 | 815 |
|
| ||||||||
| Chungnam | 2 | 9 | 93 | 993 | 2 | 11 | 51 | 1024 |
|
| ||||||||
| Jeonbuk | 2 | 12 | 124 | 1042 | 2 | 10 | 81 | 1107 |
|
| ||||||||
| Jeonnam | 0 | 19 | 112 | 888 | 1 | 22 | 83 | 905 |
|
| ||||||||
| Gyeongbuk | 0 | 18 | 146 | 1169 | 0 | 19 | 84 | 1226 |
|
| ||||||||
| Gyeongnam | 1 | 24 | 198 | 1457 | 2 | 22 | 142 | 1522 |
|
| ||||||||
| Jeju | 0 | 6 | 11 | 298 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 361 |
|
| ||||||||
| Total | 44 | 269 | 2039 | 27027 | 43 | 294 | 1496 | 29488 |
Fig. 3Recent trends in the number of patients and the cost of treatment of cerebral infarction, traumatic brain injury, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. A: The number of patients treated, B: The cost of treatment (units: 10000 won).