| Literature DB >> 29354143 |
Shuvobrata Majumder1, Chirabrata Sarkar1, Prosanta Saha1, Bheemanna S Gotyal2, Subrata Satpathy2, Karabi Datta1, Swapan K Datta1,3.
Abstract
Jute (Corchorus sp.) is naturally occurring, biodegradable, lignocellulosic-long, silky, golden shiny fiber producing plant that has great demands globally. Paper and textile industries are interested in jute because of the easy availability, non-toxicity and high yield of cellulosic biomass produced per acre in cultivation. Jute is the major and most industrially used bast fiber-producing crop in the world and it needs protection from insect pest infestation that decreases its yield and quality. Single locus integration of the synthetically fused cry1Ab/Ac gene of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) in Corchorus capsularis (JRC 321) by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated shoot tip transformation provided 5 potent Bt jute lines BT1, BT2, BT4, BT7 and BT8. These lines consistently expressed the Cry1Ab/Ac endotoxin ranging from 0.16 to 0.35 ng/mg of leaf, in the following generations (analyzed upto T4). The effect of Cry1Ab/Ac endotoxin was studied against 3 major Lepidopteran pests of jute- semilooper (Anomis sabulifera Guenee), hairy caterpillar (Spilarctia obliqua Walker) and indigo caterpillar (Spodoptera exigua Hubner) by detached leaf and whole plant insect bioassay on greenhouse-grown transgenic plants. Results confirm that larvae feeding on transgenic plants had lower food consumption, body size, body weight and dry weight of excreta compared to non-transgenic controls. Insect mortality range among transgenic feeders was 66-100% for semilooper and hairy caterpillar and 87.50% for indigo caterpillar. Apart from insect resistance, the transgenic plants were at par with control plants in terms of agronomic parameters and fiber quality. Hence, these Bt jutes in the field would survive Lepidopteran pest infestation, minimize harmful pesticide usage and yield good quality fiber.Entities:
Keywords: Anomis sabulifera; Bacillus thuringiensis; Bt jute; Spilarctia obliqua; Spodoptera exigua; cry1Ab/Ac; insect resistant plant; integrated pest management
Year: 2018 PMID: 29354143 PMCID: PMC5758602 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Composition of different culture media used for Bt jute development.
| Plant media name | Composition | pH |
|---|---|---|
| Germination media | MS salts and vitamins (HiMedia Lab. Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India) + Sucrose (15%) + Agar (0.8%) | 5.8 |
| Infiltration/Co-cultivation media | MS salts and vitamins + Myo-inositol (0.1%) + Sucrose (2%) + BAP (0.5 mg/l) + IAA (1 mg/l) + GA3 (0.2 mg/l) + Acetosyringone (20 mg/l) | 5.6 |
| Agro-eradication media | MS salts and vitamins + Sucrose (15%) + Timentin (500 mg/l) | 5.6 |
| Elongation/Selection media | MS salts and vitamins + Myo-inositol (0.1%) + Sucrose (3%) + BAP (1 mg/l) + IAA (0.5 mg/l) + Hygromycin-B (12 mg/l) + Agar (0.8%) | 5.8 |
| Rooting media | Half strength MS salts and vitamins + Myo-inositol (0.05%) + Sucrose (1.5%) + IBA (0.3 mg/l) + Agar (0.6%) | 5.8 |
| Segregation + Selection media | MS salts and vitamins + Sucrose (15%) + Hygromycin-B (15 mg/l) + Agar (0.8%) | 5.8 |
Segregation analysis of hpt gene in T1 and T2 generation progeny plants.
| Transgenic generation | Plant ID | Plant survivable % in hygromycin-B | Best fit segregation ratio | Chi squared value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | BT1 | 34 | 10 | 77.27 | 1:3 | 0.12 | 0.73 |
| BT2 | 40 | 9 | 81.63 | 1:3 | 1.15 | 0.28 | |
| BT4 | 35 | 13 | 72.92 | 1:3 | 0.11 | 0.74 | |
| BT7 | 34 | 15 | 69.39 | 1:3 | 0.82 | 0.36 | |
| BT8 | 35 | 12 | 74.47 | 1:3 | 0.07 | 0.93 | |
| T2 | BT1 | 41 | 12 | 77.35 | 1:3 | 0.16 | 0.70 |
| BT2 | 44 | 21 | 67.69 | 1:3 | 1.85 | 0.17 | |
| BT4 | 50 | 15 | 77.00 | 1:3 | 0.13 | 0.72 | |
| BT7 | 49 | 22 | 69.01 | 1:3 | 1.36 | 0.24 | |
| BT8 | 46 | 20 | 69.70 | 1:3 | 1.00 | 0.31 |
Transgenic Bt jute lines and their mortality (%) in WPB.
| Bt jute Lines | HC | SL | IC |
|---|---|---|---|
| BT1 | 92.00 ± 2.23 #AP = 10 | 97.00 ± 1.82 #AP = 10 | 70.00 ± 2.97 #AP = 10 |
| BT2 | 98.75 ± 2.72 #AP = 10 | 96.25 ± 1.27 #AP = 9 | 75.50 ± 2.65 #AP = 10 |
| BT4 | 97.44 ± 2.29 #AP = 9 | 95.55 ± 1.29 #AP = 9 | 62.22 ± 2.88 #AP = 9 |
| BT7 | 98.66 ± 2.23 #AP = 10 | 99.00 ± 1.77 #AP = 10 | 87.50 ± 2.08 #AP = 7 |
| BT8 | 96.66 ± 1.66 #AP = 9 | 99.11 ± 1.82 #AP = 10 | 85.66 ± 3.16 #AP = 8 |
Comparative analysis of fiber quality and other agronomic characters among non-transgenic (WT) and transgenic (BT) T4 progenies in greenhouse condition.
| Agronomic trait | Non-transgenic jute (WT) | Transgenic Bt jute lines | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT1 | BT2 | BT4 | BT7 | BT8 | ||
| Plant height (m) | 3.48 ± 0.12 | 3.30 ± 0.30 | 3.49 ± 0.21 | 3.60 ± 0.20 | 3.45 ± 0.17 | 3.50 ± 0.23 |
| Stem length (m) | 3.10 ± 0.17 | 2.95 ± 0.15 | 3.19 ± 0.16 | 3.25 ± 0.26 | 3.19 ± 0.21 | 3.17 ± 0.20 |
| Basal stem diameter (mm) | 20.0 ± 0.90 | 21.2 ± 1.1 | 19.1 ± 1.55 | 20.1 ± 1.23 | 20.3 ± 1.0 | 20.1 ± 0.75 |
| Fiber length (m) | 3.00 ± 0.30 | 3.00 ± 0.41 | 3.20 ± 0.22 | 3.22 ± 0.18 | 3.20 ± 0.32 | 3.15 ± 0.31 |
| Fiber strength (g/tex) | 19.5 ± 2.11 | 20.6 ± 1.27 | 19.6 ± 2.81 | 21.2 ± 1.67 | 22.1 ± 2.09 | 20.7 ± 1.70 |
| Fiber fineness (tex) | 1.51 ± 0.006 | 1.48 ± 0.002 | 1.50 ± 0.001 | 1.49 ± 0.007 | 1.50 ± 0.02 | 1.45 ± 0.06 |