| Literature DB >> 29354001 |
Min A Yoon1, Suk-Joo Hong1, Sun Hong1, Chang Ho Kang2, Baek Hyun Kim3, In Seong Kim4.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the association between the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of adhesive capsulitis and shoulder muscle fat percentages using a multi-echo Dixon method. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Adhesive capsulitis; Fatty quantification; MRI; Rotator cuff; Shoulder
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29354001 PMCID: PMC5768509 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.1.63
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Radiol ISSN: 1229-6929 Impact factor: 3.500
MRI Parameters for Routine Shoulder Protocol
| Axial PD TSE FS | Oblique-Sagittal PD TSE | Oblique Coronal PD TSE | Oblique Coronal T2 TSE FS | 3D- SPACE PD FS | Multi-Echo Dixon | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TR (ms) | 4120.0 | 3770.0 | 3770.0 | 4980.0 | 1000 | 9.15 |
| TE (ms) | 54.0 | 54.0 | 54.0 | 81.0 | 40.0 | 1.09, 2.46, 3.69, 4.92, 6.15, 7.38 |
| FOV (mm) | 160 × 160 | 160 × 160 | 160 × 160 | 160 × 160 | 160 × 160 | 300 × 300 |
| Matrix size | 512 × 333 | 512 × 410 | 448 × 314 | 512 × 307 | 256 × 256 | 128 × 101 |
| Slice thickness (mm) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0.6 | 4 |
| Slice gap (mm) | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.15 | 0.15 | ||
| Voxel size (mm) | 0.3 × 0.3 | 0.3 × 0.3 | 0.3 × 0.3 | 0.3 × 0.3 | 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.6 | 2.3 × 2.3 × 4.0 |
| Flip angle (°) | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | PD var | 4 |
| Averages | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| ETL | 9 | 9 | 9 | 16 | 71 | N/A |
| Bandwidth (Hz/pixel) | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 349 | 1030 |
| Slices | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 128 | 40 |
| Fat suppression | FS | FS | SPAIR |
ETL = echo trains length, FOV = field of view, FS = fat-suppressed, N/A = not available, PD = proton density, PD var = proton density variant (variable flip angles across echo train, suited to PD measurement), SPACE = sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolution, SPAIR = spectral attenuated inversion recovery, TE = echo time, TR = relaxation time, TSE = turbo spin echo
Fig. 146-year-old woman with clinical diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis.
A. Presence of axillary recess capsular hyperintensity (solid arrow) and extracapsular hyperintensity (open arrows) was evaluated by coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed imaging. B. Thickest portion of coracohumeral ligament (white line) was evaluated on oblique sagittal proton-density-weighted turbo spin-echo images. C. Thickest portion of abnormal soft tissue within rotator interval (white line) was measured at 1.5 cm lateral to base of coracoid process on oblique sagittal proton-density-weighted turbo spin-echo images. D. Thickness of axillary recess capsules on glenoidal (white line) and humeral (yellow line) sides were measured on oblique coronal images.
Fig. 2Oblique sagittal proton-density-weighted turbo spin-echo images (A) with respective locations on axial images (small boxes in lower left corner) and corresponding fat percentage maps (B) with region-of-interest placement for fat quantification.
Measurements were made at 3 cm and 1.5 cm medial to glenoid cartilage and at level of glenoid cartilage. Note heterogeneous fat distribution in shoulder musculature. DT = deltoid, IS = infraspinatus, SC = subscapularis, SS = supraspinatus, Tm = teres minor, TM = teres major
Mean Fat Percentages of Shoulder Musculature for Each Clinical Stage
| Clinical Stage | Mean | Standard Deviation | Range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supraspinatus | Total | 2.50 | 1.53 | 0.57−8.19 |
| 1 | 2.65 | 1.04 | 1.21−4.46 | |
| 2 | 3.01 | 2.50 | 0.57−8.19 | |
| 3 | 2.61 | 0.62 | 1.68−3.42 | |
| 4 | 1.15 | 0.39 | 0.88−1.80 | |
| Infraspinatus | Total | 4.23 | 2.45 | 1.19−11.62 |
| 1 | 4.01 | 1.21 | 2.11−5.32 | |
| 2 | 4.73 | 3.35 | 2.11−11.62 | |
| 3 | 4.67 | 2.68 | 2.02−9.06 | |
| 4 | 3.41 | 2.60 | 1.19−7.78 | |
| Teres minor | Total | 3.41 | 3.12 | 1.40−13.20 |
| 1 | 2.13 | 1.06 | 1.40−4.40 | |
| 2 | 2.82 | 1.47 | 1.64−5.64 | |
| 3 | 4.88 | 4.70 | 1.80−13.20 | |
| 4 | 4.55 | 4.60 | 1.46−12.46 | |
| Subscapularis | Total | 3.49 | 2.86 | 1.33−15.43 |
| 1 | 2.80 | 0.97 | 1.81−4.66 | |
| 2 | 4.80 | 4.84 | 1.57−15.43 | |
| 3 | 3.99 | 1.93 | 2.23−6.96 | |
| 4 | 2.13 | 0.47 | 1.33−2.50 | |
| Teres major | Total | 4.49 | 3.14 | 1.56−14.53 |
| 1 | 3.83 | 2.05 | 1.56−7.40 | |
| 2 | 5.92 | 4.99 | 1.58−14.53 | |
| 3 | 4.99 | 2.20 | 2.54−7.37 | |
| 4 | 2.91 | 0.70 | 2.20−3.81 | |
| Posterior deltoid | Total | 2.91 | 1.85 | 1.16−10.00 |
| 1 | 2.38 | 0.83 | 1.36−3.70 | |
| 2 | 3.97 | 2.89 | 1.92−10.00 | |
| 3 | 2.89 | 1.60 | 1.16−5.51 | |
| 4 | 2.16 | 0.67 | 1.43−3.13 |
Summary of Correlations between MRI Findings, Clinical Stages of Adhesive Capsulitis and Muscle Fat Percentages
| Axillary Recess Extracapsular Hyperintensity* | Axillary Recess Capsular Hyperintensity* | Thickness of CHL† | Thickness of Abnormal Soft Tissues in Rotator Interval† | Thickness of Axillary Recess Capsule-Glenoidal† | Thickness of Axillary Recess Capsule-Humeral† | Clinical Stages of Adhesive Capsulitis† | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supraspinatus | 0.022‡ | 0.138 | 0.114 | 0.722 | 0.553 | 0.395 | 0.083 | |
| Coefficient ( | 0.331 | −0.077 | 0.127 | 0.182 | 0.361 | |||
| Infraspinatus | 1.000 | 0.666 | 0.697 | 0.963 | 0.886 | 0.639 | 0.289 | |
| Coefficient ( | −0.084 | 0.010 | 0.031 | −0.101 | −0.226 | |||
| Teres minor | 0.666 | 0.312 | 0.329 | 0.014 (0.048)‡ | 0.019‡ (0.059) | 0.496 | 0.126 | |
| Coefficient ( | 0.208 | 0.494 (0.384)‡ | 0.475‡ (0.311) | 0.146 | 0.321 | |||
| Subscapularis | 0.122 | 0.064 | 0.549 | 0.816 | 0.788 | 0.774 | 0.572 | |
| Coefficient ( | 0.129 | 0.050 | −0.058 | 0.062 | −0.121 | |||
| Teres major | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.801 | 0.886 | 0.883 | 0.501 | 0.851 | |
| Coefficient ( | −0.054 | −0.031 | 0.032 | 0.144 | −0.040 | |||
| Posterior deltoid | 0.625 | 0.709 | 0.809 | 0.245 | 0.818 | 0.530 | 0.904 | |
| Coefficient ( | −0.052 | 0.247 | 0.050 | −0.135 | −0.026 |
Values in parentheses indicate results from partial correlation analyses with control for age, sex, and clinical stage. *Two-tailed p values from Mann-Whitney U test, †Two-tailed p values from Spearman's correlation analysis, ‡Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). r = Spearman's correlation coefficient