| Literature DB >> 29352995 |
Matthew J Page1, Isabelle Boutron2, Camilla Hansen3, Douglas G Altman4, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson3.
Abstract
Methods to assess the risk of bias in a way that is reliable, reproducible. and transparent to readers, have evolved over time. Viswanathan et al. recently provided updated recommendations for assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews of health care interventions. We comment on their recommendations and discuss new tools in development that we, as co-convenors and coordinators of the Cochrane Bias Methods Group, are leading, which complement the methods recommended.Entities:
Keywords: Bias; Methodology; Nonrandomized studies; Quality; Randomized trials; Systematic reviews
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29352995 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Epidemiol ISSN: 0895-4356 Impact factor: 6.437