| Literature DB >> 29352973 |
Aimee Benson1, Lisa Calhoun1, Meghan Corroon1, Abdou Gueye1, David Guilkey1, Essete Kebede1, Peter Lance1, Rick O'Hara1, Ilene S Speizer2, John Stewart1, Jennifer Winston1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This paper presents the impact of key components of the Senegal Urban Reproductive Health Initiative, including radio, television, community-based activities, Muslim religious-leader engagement and service quality improvement on modern contraceptive use by all women and the sub-sample of poor women. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Evaluation; Family planning; Longitudinal; Senegal; Urban
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29352973 PMCID: PMC5948164 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.01.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contraception ISSN: 0010-7824 Impact factor: 3.375
Characteristics of women included in study samples for the Senegal impact evaluation at baseline (2011) and endline (2015), MLE
| Baseline | Endline | % Interviewed at endline by baseline characteristic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | ( | ( | ( |
| Age | |||
| 15–19 | 21.2% | 3.9% | 68.7% |
| 20–24 | 21.5% | 22.1% | 69.2% |
| 25–29 | 17.7% | 21.2% | 70.6% |
| 30–34 | 13.6% | 16.2% | 77.4% |
| 35–39 | 11.7% | 13.5% | 79.0% |
| 40–44 | 8.6% | 9.8% | 82.9% |
| 45+ | 5.7% | 13.2% | 83.3% |
| Education | |||
| No education/Quranic | 32.4% | 31.3% | 72.6% |
| Primary | 33.4% | 31.5% | 75.6% |
| Secondary incomplete | 20.0% | 16.7% | 76.3% |
| Secondary complete | 8.3% | 10.8% | 69.3% |
| Higher | 5.9% | 9.7% | 59.4% |
| Religion | |||
| Christian | 9.1% | 9.4% | 69.5% |
| Muslim | 90.6% | 90.4% | 73.7% |
| None/other/missing | 0.3% | 0.2% | 80.0% |
| Wealth quintile | |||
| Poorest (1st quintile) | 19.2% | 21.7% | 69.7% |
| Poor (2nd quintile) | 19.5% | 19.8% | 75.0% |
| Middle (3rd quintile) | 20.2% | 19.2% | 74.9% |
| Rich (4th quintile) | 19.5% | 20.3% | 75.6% |
| Richest (5th quintile) | 21.5% | 19.0% | 71.6% |
| Marital status | |||
| Never married | 40.8% | 31.9% | 68.3% |
| In union (at time of interview) | 53.2% | 60.4% | 77.5% |
| Divorced, widowed, separated | 6.0% | 7.7% | 69.8% |
| City | |||
| Dakar | 42.4% | 41.4% | 68.3% |
| Guédiawaye | 10.8% | 10.7% | 73.3% |
| Pikine | 11.3% | 11.0% | 75.4% |
| Mbao | 21.7% | 22.7% | 67.6% |
| Mbour | 6.3% | 6.8% | 79.9% |
| Kaolack | 7.5% | 7.6% | 74.0% |
Each sample uses the weights from that sample and time period. Unweighted number of observations shown.
Women's contraceptive use at each time period, Senegal, MLE, 2011 and 2015
| All women | Poor women† | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Endline | Baseline | Endline | |
| Contraceptive Use | ( | ( | ( | ( |
| Modern | 16.9% | 22.1% | 16.6% | 24.1% |
| Traditional | 2.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | 2.6% |
| Non-user | 81.1% | 75.5% | 81.4% | 73.4% |
| Method mix (among method users) | ( | ( | ( | ( |
| Sterilization | 2.2% | 2.1% | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Implants | 8.6% | 24.6% | 13.6% | 27.1% |
| IUD | 5.8% | 7.9% | 3.5% | 7.3% |
| Injectables | 29.5% | 31.2% | 32.1% | 33.1% |
| Pill | 30.3% | 19.2% | 25.3% | 15.7% |
| Male condom | 11.6% | 5.1% | 12.7% | 5.6% |
| Other modern methods† | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 0.2% |
| Traditional method | 10.7% | 9.6% | 10.7% | 9.7% |
| Transitions in use between baseline and endline | ( | ( | ||
| Non-user or traditional user both times | na | 70.1% | na | 68.7% |
| Non-user or traditional user to modern user | na | 14.1% | na | 15.7% |
| Modern user to non-user or traditional | na | 7.8% | na | 7.3% |
| Modern user both times | na | 8.1% | na | 8.4% |
Note: All percentages are weighted, sample sizes unweighted; sample includes women surveyed at both time periods. † Other modern methods include lactational amenorrhea, emergency contraception and female condom, spermicides, and Standard Days Method (endline only). † poor women include women in the two lowest wealth quintiles.
Percentage of women exposed to ISSU and other program activities among all women and poor women, Senegal, MLE, 2011 and 2015
| All women | Poor women | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Endline | Baseline | Endline | |
| FP in Newspaper/magazine | 4.4% | 11.6% | 2.8% | 5.5% |
| Radio exposure to FP | 19.8% | 66.2% | 19.7% | 59.1% |
| Television exposure to FP | 41.2% | 92.5% | 36.4% | 85.7% |
| ISSU community religious talks about FP | 0.0% | 6.3% | 0.0% | 4.9% |
| Religious leader speaks favorably about FP | 14.7% | 57.5% | 12.6% | 54.6% |
| ISSU community activities | 0.0% | 25.5% | 0.0% | 29.5% |
| SMS messages about FP | 0.9% | 1.4% | 0.4% | 0.9% |
| FP on the Internet | 0.0% | 5.6% | 0.0% | 1.6% |
| Any stock outs in last 30 days for facilities w/in 1Km | 68.3% | 13.6% | 72.1% | 14.4% |
| Quality improvement committee at facility w/in 1Km | 77.9% | 49.8% | 79.0% | 54.0% |
| FP guidelines at facility w/in 1Km | 72.2% | 48.1% | 71.5% | 49.5% |
| ISSU/Informed Push Model (IPM) facility w/in 1Km | 0.0% | 96.1% | 0.0% | 97.4% |
Note: All values weighted using the weights from the relevant time period. See Appendix A for description of variables used to create the exposure measures presented in this table.
poor women include women in the two lowest wealth quintiles.
Impact results, presented as marginal effects, of program activities on modern contraceptive use in Senegal, MLE, 2011 and 2015
| Marginal effects of 100% exposure | ||
|---|---|---|
| All women | Poor women† | |
| % Change in CPR (SE %) | % Change in CPR (SE %) | |
| Newspaper/magazine | −0.76 (1.86) | 0.11 (5.02) |
| Radio exposure | 2.17 (1.11)+ | 4.21 (1.89)* |
| Television exposure | 1.69 (0.96)+ | −1.23 (2.02) |
| ISSU community religious talks | 1.55 (2.26) | −2.84 (4.17) |
| Religious leader speaks favorably about FP | 0.72 (0.93) | 1.56 (1.74) |
| ISSU community activities | 5.12 (1.33)*** | 8.47 (2.28)*** |
| SMS messages about FP | 1.44 (4.15) | 13.04 (9.98) |
| Internet | −2.35 (2.57) | −2.85 (8.69) |
| Any stock outs for facilities w/in 1Km | −1.71 (0.97)+ | 1.95 (1.83) |
| Quality improvement committee at facility w/in 1Km | 0.05 (1.11) | −2.10 (2.00) |
| FP guidelines at facility w/in 1Km | 3.54 (0.84)*** | 2.96 (1.52)+ |
| ISSU/Informed Push Model (IPM) facility | −0.69 (1.16) | 4.32 (2.17)* |
+ p≤.1; * p≤.05; ** p≤.01; *** p≤.001. † poor women include women in the two lowest wealth quintiles.
Note: models were run as fixed effect linear regression using longitudinal baseline/endline data and control for age, marital status, religion, education, wealth group, and city of residence.
| Category | FP Exposure Measure | Exposure Components |
|---|---|---|
| Demand | Newspaper or magazine | • Read about FP in a newspaper or magazine in the last 3 months |
| Radio exposure | • Heard FP message on the radio in the last 3 months | |
| • Heard an FP spot/advertisement on the radio in the last year | ||
| • Heard FP message on a health radio program in last year | ||
| • Heard FP message on a religious radio program in last year | ||
| • Heard FP message on a musical radio program in last year | ||
| • Heard FP message on an interactive radio program in last year | ||
| • Heard FP message on the radio program Xam sa yaram in last year | ||
| TV exposure | • Seen an FP message on the TV in the last 3 months | |
| • Seen an FP spot/advertisement on the TV in the last year | ||
| • Heard FP message on Dine Ak Diamano on Walf TV in last year | ||
| • Heard FP message on Ndieguemar on Télévision Futurs Média (TFM) in last year | ||
| • Heard FP message on Li ci penc mi on TFM in last year | ||
| • Heard FP message on Thow li Thiow li on 2STV in last year | ||
| • Heard FP message on Sen DINE on la SEN TV in last year | ||
| • Heard FP message on Decriptage on la 2STV in last year | ||
| • Heard FP message on Xam sa yaram on Lamp FALL TV in last year | ||
| ISSU community religious talks | • Participated in the last year in a community-based religious talk | |
| Religious leader | • Have heard a religious leader speak favorably about FP in the last year (ISSU trained Muslim religious leaders as part of their program) | |
| ISSU community activities | • Heard FP message at a community meeting in the last year | |
| • Heard FP message at a community conversation in the last year | ||
| • Heard FP message at a community based education session (niche anime) in the last year | ||
| • Heard FP message at a home visit by outreach worker in the last year | ||
| SMS messages about FP | • Received an FP message via SMS in the last 3 months | |
| Internet | • Saw an FP message on the internet in the last 3 months | |
| Supply | Stock-outs | • Woman lives within 1 km of a facility with any stock outs in the last 30 days |
| Quality assurance committee | • Woman lives within 1 km of a facility with a quality assurance committee | |
| Family planning guidelines | • Woman lives within 1 km of a facility with observed FP guidelines | |
| ISSU and Informed Push Model (IPM) facility | • Woman lives within 1 km of an IPM/ISSU participating health facility |
On the following radio stations: Rail Bi FM, Oxyjeunes, Afia FM, Mozdair, Jokko rufisque, dounya, Sud FM, Renndo, Lamp fall, Mbour FM or Alfayda.
On the following radio stations: Rail Bi FM, Oxyjeunes, Afia FM, Jokko rufisque, dounya, Sud FM KL, Renndo, Lamp fall, Mbour FM or Alfayda.
On the following radio stations: Rail Bi FM, Oxyjeunes, Afia FM, Jokko rufisque, dounya, Sud FM KL, Afia FM, Jokko rufisque, dounya, Sud FM KL.
On the following radio stations: Loci Xam sur Sud FM.
On the radio stations Lamp Fall FM.
Exposure was not measured at baseline for these items.