Sydney G O'Connor1, Wangjing Ke1, Eldin Dzubur1, Susan Schembre2, Genevieve F Dunton1. 1. 1Department of Preventive Medicine,University of Southern California,2001 N. Soto Street,3rd Floor,MC 9239,Los Angeles,CA 90032,USA. 2. 2Department of Behavioral Science,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston,TX,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide preliminary evidence in support of using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), a real-time data capture method involving repeated assessments, to measure dietary intake in children by examining the concordance of children's dietary reports through EMA and 24 h recall. DESIGN: Children completed eight days of EMA surveys, reporting on recent dietary intake of four pre-specified food categories ('Fruits or Vegetables', 'Chips or Fries', 'Pastries or Sweets', 'Soda or Energy Drinks'), and completed two 24 h recalls during the same period. Concordance of children's reports of intake during matched two-hour time windows from EMA and 24 h dietary recall was assessed using cross-tabulation. Multilevel logistic regression examined potential person-level (i.e. sex, age, ethnicity and BMI category) predictors of concordance. SETTING: Children in Los Angeles County, USA, enrolled in the Mothers' and Their Children's Health (MATCH) study. SUBJECTS: One hundred and forty-four 144 children (53 % female; mean age 9·6 (sd 0·9) years; 34·0 % overweight/obese). RESULTS: Two-hour concordance varied by food category, ranging from 64·9 % for 'Fruits/Vegetables' to 89·9 % for 'Soda/Energy Drinks'. In multilevel models, overweight/obese (v. lean) was associated with greater odds (OR; 95 % CI) of concordant reporting for 'Soda/Energy Drinks' (2·01; 1·06, 4·04) and 'Pastries/Sweets' (1·61; 1·03, 2·52). Odds of concordant reporting were higher for Hispanic (v. non-Hispanic) children for 'Pastries/Sweets' (1·55; 1·02, 2·36) and for girls (v. boys) for 'Fruits/Vegetables' (1·36; 1·01, 1·83). CONCLUSIONS: Concordance differed by food category as well as by person-level characteristics. Future research should continue to explore use of EMA to facilitate dietary assessment in children.
OBJECTIVE: To provide preliminary evidence in support of using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), a real-time data capture method involving repeated assessments, to measure dietary intake in children by examining the concordance of children's dietary reports through EMA and 24 h recall. DESIGN:Children completed eight days of EMA surveys, reporting on recent dietary intake of four pre-specified food categories ('Fruits or Vegetables', 'Chips or Fries', 'Pastries or Sweets', 'Soda or Energy Drinks'), and completed two 24 h recalls during the same period. Concordance of children's reports of intake during matched two-hour time windows from EMA and 24 h dietary recall was assessed using cross-tabulation. Multilevel logistic regression examined potential person-level (i.e. sex, age, ethnicity and BMI category) predictors of concordance. SETTING:Children in Los Angeles County, USA, enrolled in the Mothers' and Their Children's Health (MATCH) study. SUBJECTS: One hundred and forty-four 144 children (53 % female; mean age 9·6 (sd 0·9) years; 34·0 % overweight/obese). RESULTS: Two-hour concordance varied by food category, ranging from 64·9 % for 'Fruits/Vegetables' to 89·9 % for 'Soda/Energy Drinks'. In multilevel models, overweight/obese (v. lean) was associated with greater odds (OR; 95 % CI) of concordant reporting for 'Soda/Energy Drinks' (2·01; 1·06, 4·04) and 'Pastries/Sweets' (1·61; 1·03, 2·52). Odds of concordant reporting were higher for Hispanic (v. non-Hispanic) children for 'Pastries/Sweets' (1·55; 1·02, 2·36) and for girls (v. boys) for 'Fruits/Vegetables' (1·36; 1·01, 1·83). CONCLUSIONS: Concordance differed by food category as well as by person-level characteristics. Future research should continue to explore use of EMA to facilitate dietary assessment in children.
Entities:
Keywords:
24 h recall; Children; Dietary intake; Ecological momentary assessment
Authors: Tyler B Mason; Sydney G O'Connor; Susan M Schembre; Jimi Huh; Daniel Chu; Genevieve F Dunton Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Stephanie G Harshman; Jenny Jo; Megan Kuhnle; Kristine Hauser; Helen Burton Murray; Kendra R Becker; Madhusmita Misra; Kamryn T Eddy; Nadia Micali; Elizabeth A Lawson; Jennifer J Thomas Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Katie A Loth; Angela Fertig; Amanda Trofholz; Lisa Harnack; Ross Crosby; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer; Jerica M Berge Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Stephanie G Harshman; Olivia Wons; Madeline S Rogers; Alyssa M Izquierdo; Tara M Holmes; Reitumetse L Pulumo; Elisa Asanza; Kamryn T Eddy; Madhusmita Misra; Nadia Micali; Elizabeth A Lawson; Jennifer J Thomas Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Shirlene D Wang; Michele Nicolo; Li Yi; Genevieve F Dunton; Tyler B Mason Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Susan M Schembre; Yue Liao; Sydney G O'Connor; Melanie D Hingle; Shu-En Shen; Katarina G Hamoy; Jimi Huh; Genevieve F Dunton; Rick Weiss; Cynthia A Thomson; Carol J Boushey Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 4.773