Joseph D Morrison1, Nasya Mendoza-Elias1, Andrew J Lipnik2, R Peter Lokken2, James T Bui2, Charles E Ray2, Ron C Gaba3. 1. University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, 1740 West Taylor Street MC 931, Chicago, IL 60612. 3. Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, 1740 West Taylor Street MC 931, Chicago, IL 60612. Electronic address: rgaba@uic.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To quantify and compare portosystemic pressure gradients (PSGs) between bleeding esophageal varices (EV) and gastric varices (GV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single-center, retrospective study, 149 patients with variceal bleeding (90 men, 59 women, mean age 52 y) with EV (n = 69; 46%) or GV (n = 80; 54%) were selected from 320 consecutive patients who underwent successful transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation from 1998 to 2016. GV were subcategorized using the Sarin classification as gastroesophageal varices (GEV) (n = 57) or isolated gastric varices (IGV) (n = 23). PSG before TIPS was measured from the main portal vein to the right atrium. PSGs were compared across EV, GEV, and IGV groups using 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Overall mean baseline PSG was 21 mm Hg ± 6. PSG was significantly higher in patients with EV versus GV (23 mm Hg vs 19 mm Hg; P < .001). Mean PSG was highest among EV (23 mm Hg) with lower PSGs identified for GEV (20 mm Hg) and IGV (16 mm Hg); this difference was statistically significant (P < .001). Among 95 acute bleeding cases, a similar pattern was evident (EV 23 mm Hg vs GEV mm Hg 20 vs IGV 17 mm Hg; P < .001). At baseline PSG < 12 mm Hg, 13% (3/23) of IGV bled versus 9% (5/57) of GEV and 3% (2/69) of EVs (P = .169). Mean final PSG after TIPS was 8 mm Hg (IGV 6 mm Hg vs EV and GEV 8 mm Hg; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: GV bleed at lower PSGs than EV. EV, GEV, and IGV bleeding is associated with successively lower PSGs. These findings highlight distinct physiology, anatomy, and behavior of GV compared with EV.
PURPOSE: To quantify and compare portosystemic pressure gradients (PSGs) between bleeding esophageal varices (EV) and gastric varices (GV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single-center, retrospective study, 149 patients with variceal bleeding (90 men, 59 women, mean age 52 y) with EV (n = 69; 46%) or GV (n = 80; 54%) were selected from 320 consecutive patients who underwent successful transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation from 1998 to 2016. GV were subcategorized using the Sarin classification as gastroesophageal varices (GEV) (n = 57) or isolated gastric varices (IGV) (n = 23). PSG before TIPS was measured from the main portal vein to the right atrium. PSGs were compared across EV, GEV, and IGV groups using 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Overall mean baseline PSG was 21 mm Hg ± 6. PSG was significantly higher in patients with EV versus GV (23 mm Hg vs 19 mm Hg; P < .001). Mean PSG was highest among EV (23 mm Hg) with lower PSGs identified for GEV (20 mm Hg) and IGV (16 mm Hg); this difference was statistically significant (P < .001). Among 95 acute bleeding cases, a similar pattern was evident (EV 23 mm Hg vs GEV mm Hg 20 vs IGV 17 mm Hg; P < .001). At baseline PSG < 12 mm Hg, 13% (3/23) of IGV bled versus 9% (5/57) of GEV and 3% (2/69) of EVs (P = .169). Mean final PSG after TIPS was 8 mm Hg (IGV 6 mm Hg vs EV and GEV 8 mm Hg; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: GV bleed at lower PSGs than EV. EV, GEV, and IGV bleeding is associated with successively lower PSGs. These findings highlight distinct physiology, anatomy, and behavior of GV compared with EV.
Authors: Cosmas Rinaldi A Lesmana; Kemal F Kalista; Sharon Sandra; Irsan Hasan; Andri Sanityoso Sulaiman; Juferdy Kurniawan; Chyntia O M Jasirwan; Saut H Nababan; Mutiara Lirendra; Gita Aprilicia; Rino A Gani Journal: JGH Open Date: 2019-12-28
Authors: Justin R Boike; Bartley G Thornburg; Sumeet K Asrani; Michael B Fallon; Brett E Fortune; Manhal J Izzy; Elizabeth C Verna; Juan G Abraldes; Andrew S Allegretti; Jasmohan S Bajaj; Scott W Biggins; Michael D Darcy; Maryjane A Farr; Khashayar Farsad; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Shelley A Hall; Caroline C Jadlowiec; Michael J Krowka; Jeanne Laberge; Edward W Lee; David C Mulligan; Mitra K Nadim; Patrick G Northup; Riad Salem; Joseph J Shatzel; Cathryn J Shaw; Douglas A Simonetto; Jonathan Susman; K Pallav Kolli; Lisa B VanWagner Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 13.576