Literature DB >> 29352586

The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer.

Luke J Rogers1, David Bleetman2, David E Messenger3, Natasha A Joshi4, Lesley Wood5, Neil J Rasburn4, Timothy J P Batchelor6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs in thoracic surgery is relatively recent with limited outcome data. This study aimed to determine the impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway on morbidity and length of stay in patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer.
METHODS: This prospective cohort study collected data on consecutive patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer between April 2012 and June 2014 at a regional referral center in the United Kingdom. All patients followed a standardized, 15-element Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol. Key data fields included protocol compliance with individual elements, pathophysiology, and operative factors. Thirty-day morbidity was taken as the primary outcome measure and classified a priori according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Logistic regression models were devised to identify independent risk factors for morbidity and length of stay.
RESULTS: A total of 422 consecutive patients underwent lung resection over a 2-year period, of whom 302 (71.6%) underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Lobectomy was performed in 297 patients (70.4%). Complications were experienced by 159 patients (37.6%). The median length of stay was 5 days (range, 1-67), and 6 patients (1.4%) died within 30 days of surgery. There was a significant inverse relationship between protocol compliance and morbidity after adjustment for confounding factors (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.91; P < .01). Age, lobectomy or pneumonectomy, more than 1 resection, and delayed mobilization were independent predictors of morbidity. Age, lack of preoperative carbohydrate drinks, planned high dependency unit/intensive therapy unit admission, delayed mobilization, and open approach were independent predictors of delayed discharge (length of stay >5 days).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased compliance with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway is associated with improved clinical outcomes after resection for primary lung cancer. Several elements, including early mobilization, appear to be more influential than others.
Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS); Enhanced Recovery Program (ERP); fast-track surgery; lung cancer; thoracic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29352586     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  32 in total

Review 1.  Pain management within an enhanced recovery program after thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Calvin Thompson; Daniel G French; Ioana Costache
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Implementing a thoracic enhanced recovery with ambulation after surgery program: key aspects and challenges.

Authors:  Marissa A Mayor; Sandeep J Khandhar; Joby Chandy; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  ERAS and patient reported outcomes in thoracic surgery: a review of current data.

Authors:  Rachel L Medbery; Felix G Fernandez; Onkar V Khullar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  The 100 most cited articles on thoracic surgery management of lung cancer.

Authors:  Ke Jin; Quanteng Hu; Jianfeng Xu; Chunlei Wu; Michael K Hsin; Carmelina C Zirafa; Nuria M Novoa; Stefano Bongiolatti; Robert J Cerfolio; Jianfei Shen; Dehua Ma
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Devising the guidelines: the techniques of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery-postoperative management and enhanced recovery after surgery.

Authors:  Luca Bertolaccini; Alessandro Brunelli
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  No drain policy for "ultimate" enhanced recovery after surgery.

Authors:  Takuro Miyazaki; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Patient and procedural features predicting early and mid-term outcome after radical surgery for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Christoph Ellenberger; Najia Garofano; Thomas Reynaud; Frédéric Triponez; John Diaper; Pierre-Olivier Bridevaux; Wolfram Karenovics; Marc Licker
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Impact on the Systemic Inflammatory Response of Patients Following Gynecological Oncology Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Jin Peng; Ruiying Dong; Jianfen Jiao; Min Liu; Xi Zhang; Hualei Bu; Ping Dong; Shasha Zhao; Naidong Xing; Shuai Feng; Xingsheng Yang; Beihua Kong
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  An enhanced recovery after surgery program for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery anatomical lung resections is cost-effective.

Authors:  Michel Gonzalez; Etienne Abdelnour-Berchtold; Jean Yannis Perentes; Valérie Doucet; Mathieu Zellweger; Carlos Marcucci; Hans-Beat Ris; Thorsten Krueger; Fabrizio Gronchi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  The effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery program on lung cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rongyang Li; Kun Wang; Chenghao Qu; Weifeng Qi; Tao Fang; Weiming Yue; Hui Tian
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.