Literature DB >> 29352401

Does Giving Parents Their Choice of Interventions for Child Behavior Problems Improve Child Outcomes?

Abigail H Gewirtz1, Susanne S Lee2, Gerald J August3, Yaliu He4.   

Abstract

Empowering consumers to be active decision-makers in their own care is a core tenet of personalized, or precision medicine. Nonetheless, there is a dearth of research on intervention preferences in families seeking interventions for a child with behavior problems. Specifically, the evidence is inconclusive as to whether providing parents with choice of intervention improves child/youth outcomes (i.e., reduces externalizing problems). In this study, 129 families presenting to community mental health clinics for child conduct problems were enrolled in a doubly randomized preference study and initially randomized to choice or no-choice conditions. Families assigned to the choice condition were offered their choice of intervention from among three different formats of the Parent Management Training-Oregon Model/PMTO (group, individual clinic, home based) and services-as-usual (child-focused therapy). Those assigned to the no-choice condition were again randomized, to one of the four intervention conditions. Intent-to-treat analyses revealed partial support for the effect of parental choice on child intervention outcomes. Assignment to the choice condition predicted teacher-reported improved child hyperactivity/inattention outcomes at 6 months post-treatment completion. No main effect of choice on parent reported child outcomes was found. Moderation analyses indicated that among parents who selected PMTO, teacher report of hyperactivity/inattention was significantly improved compared with parents selecting SAU, and compared with those assigned to PMTO within the no-choice condition. Contrary to hypotheses, teacher report of hyperactivity/inattention was also significantly improved for families assigned to SAU within the no-choice condition, indicating that within the no-choice condition, SAU outperformed the parenting interventions. Implications for prevention research are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child outcomes; Choice of intervention; PMTO; Parenting

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29352401      PMCID: PMC6054560          DOI: 10.1007/s11121-018-0865-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  41 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.

Authors:  Nicole K Schatz; Gregory A Fabiano; Charles E Cunningham; Susan dosReis; Daniel A Waschbusch; Stephanie Jerome; Kellina Lupas; Karen L Morris
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Understanding controlled trials. What is a patient preference trial?

Authors:  D J Torgerson; B Sibbald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-31

3.  The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): the factor structure and scale validation in U.S. adolescents.

Authors:  Jian-Ping He; Marcy Burstein; Anja Schmitz; Kathleen R Merikangas
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-05

4.  Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  C R Brewin; C Bradley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-29

5.  Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms.

Authors:  C Chilvers; M Dewey; K Fielding; V Gretton; P Miller; B Palmer; D Weller; R Churchill; I Williams; N Bedi; C Duggan; A Lee; G Harrison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-31

6.  Parent recruitment and retention in a universal prevention program for child behavior and emotional problems: barriers to research and program participation.

Authors:  Nina Heinrichs; Heike Bertram; Annett Kuschel; Kurt Hahlweg
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2005-12

7.  The family check-up with high-risk indigent families: preventing problem behavior by increasing parents' positive behavior support in early childhood.

Authors:  Thomas J Dishion; Daniel Shaw; Arin Connell; Frances Gardner; Chelsea Weaver; Melvin Wilson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

8.  Using time-varying covariates in multilevel growth models.

Authors:  D Betsy McCoach; Burcu Kaniskan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-06-14

9.  Estimating the causal effect of randomization versus treatment preference in a doubly randomized preference trial.

Authors:  Sue M Marcus; Elizabeth A Stuart; Pei Wang; William R Shadish; Peter M Steiner
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-05-07

10.  Testing the Oregon delinquency model with 9-year follow-up of the Oregon Divorce Study.

Authors:  Marion S Forgatch; Gerald R Patterson; David S Degarmo; Zintars G Beldavs
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2009
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of GenerationPMTO to Promote Parenting and Child Adjustment: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Authors:  Qiyue Cai; Athena C Y Chan; Sun-Kyung Lee; Scott Marsalis; Abigail H Gewirtz
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2022-06-08

2.  Moving Toward a Precision-Based, Personalized Framework for Prevention Science: Introduction to the Special Issue.

Authors:  Gerald J August; Abigail Gewirtz
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2019-01

Review 3.  Review of barriers and interventions to promote treatment engagement for pediatric attention deficit hyperactivity disorder care.

Authors:  Raman Baweja; Cesar A Soutullo; James G Waxmonsky
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-19

Review 4.  A scoping review and assessment of essential elements of shared decision-making of parent-involved interventions in child and adolescent mental health.

Authors:  Shaun Liverpool; Brent Pereira; Daniel Hayes; Miranda Wolpert; Julian Edbrooke-Childs
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.785

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.