Literature DB >> 29352356

Assessment of noise level and noise propagation generated by light-lift helicopters in mountain natural environments.

Stefano Grigolato1, Omar Mologni2, Andrea Rosario Proto3, Giuseppe Zimbalatti3, Raffaele Cavalli2.   

Abstract

The use of helicopter rises discussion about environmental noise propagation especially when it operates in proximity of environmentally sensitive areas (ESAs) for an extended period because of its potential implications in wildlife behaviours. In order to support decisions on helicopter logging operation management in proximity of ESAs, this study focused on (i) analysing the noise spectrum of a light-lift helicopter during logging operations and on (ii) assessing the noise propagation in the surrounding environments. This study investigated a helicopter logging operation for wood fuel extraction in the eastern part of the Italian Alps. The potential disturbance area covered for the entire helicopter logging operation was evaluated by a specific GIS application according to hearing sensitivity of the most sensitive wildlife species in the study area (different strigiform species). The noise level at the ground appeared to be affected by the location regardless both the use of equivalent continuous sound pressures level dB(A) (LAeq) and the single-event level (SEL) noise metrics. The lowest values were recorded when the helicopter was flown over the sound meter level located under the forest canopy, while the highest was recorded when the helicopter was unhooking the loads at the landing. The GIS application highlighted the consistent of the exceeded noise area (weighted to strigiform hearing range and sensitivity) for the lower frequency bands (0.016-0.250 kHz). A more restricted exceeded noise area concerned instead the most sensitive frequency bands" for the strigiform (1-2 kHz). Graphical abstract ᅟ.

Keywords:  Environmentally sensitive area; Firewood; GIS modelling; Helicopter logging; Noise propagation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29352356     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-6464-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

Review 1.  The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; Kevin R Crooks; Kurt M Fristrup
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an integrative, mechanistic review.

Authors:  Caitlin R Kight; John P Swaddle
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 3.  A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife.

Authors:  Graeme Shannon; Megan F McKenna; Lisa M Angeloni; Kevin R Crooks; Kurt M Fristrup; Emma Brown; Katy A Warner; Misty D Nelson; Cecilia White; Jessica Briggs; Scott McFarland; George Wittemyer
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2015-06-26

4.  Vocal traits and diet explain avian sensitivities to anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Reconstruction of vocal interactions in a group of small songbirds.

Authors:  Victor N Anisimov; Joshua A Herbst; Andrei N Abramchuk; Alexander V Latanov; Richard H R Hahnloser; Alexei L Vyssotski
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 28.547

  5 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Geographical mapping and modelling of noise pollution from industrial motors: a case study of the Mbalmayo Thermal Power Plant in Cameroon.

Authors:  J C Seutche; J L Nsouandélé; J G Tamba; B Bonoma
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.513

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.