Literature DB >> 29352043

Prognostic Implications of Multiplex Detection of KRAS Mutations in Cell-Free DNA from Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Min Kyeong Kim1, Sang Myung Woo2, Boram Park3, Kyong-Ah Yoon4, Yun-Hee Kim5,6, Jungnam Joo3, Woo Jin Lee2, Sung-Sik Han2, Sang-Jae Park2, Sun-Young Kong7,5,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is known to provide potential biomarkers for predicting clinical outcome, but its value in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical applicability of quantitative analysis of multiplex KRAS mutations in cell-free DNA from patients with PDAC.
METHODS: A total of 106 patients with PDAC were enrolled in this prospective study. The concentration and fraction of KRAS mutations were determined through multiplex detection of KRAS mutations in plasma samples by use of a droplet digital PCR kit (Bio-Rad).
RESULTS: KRAS mutations were detected in 96.1% of tissue samples. Eighty patients (80.5%) harbored KRAS mutations in cfDNA, with a median KRAS mutation concentration of 0.165 copies/μL and a median fractional abundance of 0.415%. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that the KRAS mutation concentration [hazard ratio (HR), 2.08; 95% CI, 1.20-3.63] and KRAS fraction (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.02-2.95) were significant factors for progression-free survival. KRAS mutation concentration (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.05-3.67) also had prognostic implications for overall survival. Subgroup analyses showed that KRAS mutation concentration and fractional abundance significantly affected progression-free survival in resectable PDAC (P = 0.016). Moreover, when combined with the cancer biomarker CA19-9, the KRAS mutation concentration in cfDNA showed additive benefits for the prediction of overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that multiplex detection of KRAS mutations in plasma cfDNA is clinically relevant, providing a potential candidate biomarker for prognosis of PDAC.
© 2018 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29352043     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.283721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  20 in total

Review 1.  Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Susana Olmedillas-López; Rocío Olivera-Salazar; Mariano García-Arranz; Damián García-Olmo
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 2.  Circulating tumour DNA: a challenging innovation to develop "precision onco-surgery" in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel Pietrasz; Elisabetta Sereni; Francesco Lancelotti; Antonio Pea; Claudio Luchini; Giulio Innamorati; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 9.075

3.  Prognostic Value of ctDNA Mutation in Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yang Zheng; Hongyan Sun; Lele Cong; Chenlu Liu; Qian Sun; Nan Wu; Xianling Cong
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.375

4.  Individualized metabolic profiling stratifies pancreatic and biliary tract cancer: a useful tool for innovative screening programs and predictive strategies in healthcare.

Authors:  Jun Hwa Lee; Seung Eun Yu; Kyung-Hee Kim; Myung Hyun Yu; In-Hye Jeong; Jae Youl Cho; Sang-Jae Park; Woo Jin Lee; Sung-Sik Han; Tae Hyun Kim; Eun Kyung Hong; Sang Myung Woo; Byong Chul Yoo
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 6.543

5.  Fragment size and level of cell-free DNA provide prognostic information in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Morten Lapin; Satu Oltedal; Kjersti Tjensvoll; Tove Buhl; Rune Smaaland; Herish Garresori; Milind Javle; Nils Idar Glenjen; Bente Kristin Abelseth; Bjørnar Gilje; Oddmund Nordgård
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Enrichment of short mutant cell-free DNA fragments enhanced detection of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Liu; Lingxiao Liu; Yuan Ji; Changyu Li; Tao Wei; Xuerong Yang; Yuefang Zhang; Xuyu Cai; Yangbin Gao; Weihong Xu; Shengxiang Rao; Dayong Jin; Wenhui Lou; Zilong Qiu; Xiaolin Wang
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 8.143

7.  Development of Patient-Derived Preclinical Platform for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: PDOX and a Subsequent Organoid Model System Using Percutaneous Biopsy Samples.

Authors:  Sun Il Choi; A-Ra Jeon; Min Kyeong Kim; Yu-Sun Lee; Ji Eun Im; Jung-Wook Koh; Sung-Sik Han; Sun-Young Kong; Kyong-Ah Yoon; Young-Hwan Koh; Ju Hee Lee; Woo Jin Lee; Sang-Jae Park; En Kyung Hong; Sang Myung Woo; Yun-Hee Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Liquid biopsy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: current status of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA.

Authors:  Jee-Soo Lee; Sung Sup Park; Young Kyung Lee; Jeffrey A Norton; Stefanie S Jeffrey
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 6.603

9.  Circulating tumor DNA quantity is related to tumor volume and both predict survival in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Marin Strijker; Eline C Soer; Matteo de Pastena; Aafke Creemers; Alberto Balduzzi; Jamie J Beagan; Olivier R Busch; Otto M van Delden; Hans Halfwerk; Jeanin E van Hooft; Krijn P van Lienden; Giovanni Marchegiani; Sybren L Meijer; Carel J van Noesel; Roy J Reinten; Eva Roos; Sandor Schokker; Joanne Verheij; Marc J van de Vijver; Cynthia Waasdorp; Johanna W Wilmink; Bauke Ylstra; Marc G Besselink; Maarten F Bijlsma; Frederike Dijk; Hanneke W van Laarhoven
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 10.  Impact of circulating tumor DNA in hepatocellular and pancreatic carcinomas.

Authors:  Sameer A Dhayat; Zixuan Yang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.