Literature DB >> 29351669

How Pairwise Coevolutionary Models Capture the Collective Residue Variability in Proteins?

Matteo Figliuzzi1, Pierre Barrat-Charlaix1, Martin Weigt1.   

Abstract

Global coevolutionary models of homologous protein families, as constructed by direct coupling analysis (DCA), have recently gained popularity in particular due to their capacity to accurately predict residue-residue contacts from sequence information alone, and thereby to facilitate tertiary and quaternary protein structure prediction. More recently, they have also been used to predict fitness effects of amino-acid substitutions in proteins, and to predict evolutionary conserved protein-protein interactions. These models are based on two currently unjustified hypotheses: 1) correlations in the amino-acid usage of different positions are resulting collectively from networks of direct couplings; and 2) pairwise couplings are sufficient to capture the amino-acid variability. Here, we propose a highly precise inference scheme based on Boltzmann-machine learning, which allows us to systematically address these hypotheses. We show how correlations are built up in a highly collective way by a large number of coupling paths, which are based on the proteins three-dimensional structure. We further find that pairwise coevolutionary models capture the collective residue variability across homologous proteins even for quantities which are not imposed by the inference procedure, like three-residue correlations, the clustered structure of protein families in sequence space or the sequence distances between homologs. These findings strongly suggest that pairwise coevolutionary models are actually sufficient to accurately capture the residue variability in homologous protein families.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29351669     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msy007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  21 in total

1.  Synthetic protein alignments by CCMgen quantify noise in residue-residue contact prediction.

Authors:  Susann Vorberg; Stefan Seemayer; Johannes Söding
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Computationally Aided Discovery of LysEFm5 Variants with Improved Catalytic Activity and Stability.

Authors:  Tsvetelina H Baryakova; Seth C Ritter; Daniel T Tresnak; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  LARGE-SCALE MULTIPLE INFERENCE OF COLLECTIVE DEPENDENCE WITH APPLICATIONS TO PROTEIN FUNCTION.

Authors:  Robert Jernigan; Kejue Jia; Zhao Ren; Wen Zhou
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 1.959

4.  Inference of stochastic time series with missing data.

Authors:  Sangwon Lee; Vipul Periwal; Junghyo Jo
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.707

5.  Assessing the accuracy of direct-coupling analysis for RNA contact prediction.

Authors:  Francesca Cuturello; Guido Tiana; Giovanni Bussi
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  Epistatic contributions promote the unification of incompatible models of neutral molecular evolution.

Authors:  Jose Alberto de la Paz; Charisse M Nartey; Monisha Yuvaraj; Faruck Morcos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Combined approaches from physics, statistics, and computer science for ab initio protein structure prediction: ex unitate vires (unity is strength)?

Authors:  Marc Delarue; Patrice Koehl
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-07-24

8.  Enhancing coevolution-based contact prediction by imposing structural self-consistency of the contacts.

Authors:  Maher M Kassem; Lars B Christoffersen; Andrea Cavalli; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Phylogenetic weighting does little to improve the accuracy of evolutionary coupling analyses.

Authors:  Adam J Hockenberry; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 2.524

10.  Direct coupling analysis of epistasis in allosteric materials.

Authors:  Barbara Bravi; Riccardo Ravasio; Carolina Brito; Matthieu Wyart
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.