Literature DB >> 29351632

Presenteeism in academic employees-occupational and individual factors.

G Kinman1, S Wray2.   

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence that presenteeism can be damaging for individuals and organizations. It is, therefore, important to identify the prevalence of working while sick in different working environments and the factors that contribute to such behaviour. Aims: To examine the prevalence of self-reported presenteeism in academic staff working in UK universities and colleges and the extent to which job demands, control, support and work engagement are risk factors.
Methods: Scales from the Health and Safety Executive Management Standards Indicator Tool were used to measure job demands, control and support from managers and co-workers. Work engagement was assessed using a validated measure and the frequency of self-reported presenteeism was measured. The effects of demands, control, support and engagement on presenteeism were examined with ordinal regression analysis.
Results: The study sample comprised 6874 people working in academic roles in UK colleges and universities (59% female). Most respondents (88%) reported working while sick at least sometimes. The risk factors for presenteeism were job demands, control, support from managers and work engagement. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that presenteeism is commonplace in UK colleges and universities. Some of the features of the job that might encourage employees to work while sick are highlighted, whereas engagement in work was an additional risk factor.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29351632     DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqx191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  7 in total

1.  Psychometric Properties of a New Simplified Scale to Assess the Quality of Workers' Rest and Recreation on Their Days Off.

Authors:  Osamu Itani; Yoshitaka Kaneita; Satoru Harano; Mikiko Tokiya; Yuichiro Otsuka; Yuuki Matsumoto; Sachi Nakagome; Yu Kinoshita
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 1.641

2.  Sickness Presenteeism among the Self-employed and Employed in Northwestern Europe-The Importance of Time Demands.

Authors:  Mikael Nordenmark; Emma Hagqvist; Stig Vinberg
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2019-01-11

3.  Factors Related to Presenteeism among South Korean Workers Exposed to Workplace Psychological Adverse Social Behavior.

Authors:  Jee-Seon Yi; Hyeoneui Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The relationship between presenteeism, quality of life and social support in higher education professionals: A cross-sectional path analysis.

Authors:  Sónia Magalhães; Joselina Barbosa; Elisabete Borges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Workplace from the Perspective of Older Employees: A Mixed Methods Research Study.

Authors:  Glykeria Skamagki; Christine Carpenter; Andrew King; Charlotte Wåhlin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Are Demanding Job Situations Associated with Alcohol-Related Presenteeism? The WIRUS-Screening Study.

Authors:  Tore Bonsaksen; Mikkel Magnus Thørrisen; Jens Christoffer Skogen; Morten Hesse; Randi Wågø Aas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Sickness Presenteeism in Prison Officers: Risk Factors and Implications for Wellbeing and Productivity.

Authors:  Gail Kinman; Andrew J Clements
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.