| Literature DB >> 29351264 |
Shihao Song1,2, Shuna Fu3,4,5, Xiuyun Sun6,7,8, Peng Li9, Ji'en Wu10, Tingyan Dong11,12, Fei He13, Yinyue Deng14,15,16.
Abstract
Ralstonia solanacearum is a causative agent of bacterial wilt in many important crops throughout the world. How to control bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum is a major problem in agriculture. In this study, we aim to isolate the biocontrol agents that have high efficacy in the control of bacterial wilt. Three new bacterial strains with high antimicrobial activity against R. solanacearum GMI1000 were isolated and identified. Our results demonstrated that these bacteria could remarkably inhibit the disease index of host plant infected by R. solanacearum. It was indicated that strain GZ-34 (CCTCC No. M 2016353) showed an excellent protective effect to tomato under greenhouse conditions. Strain GZ-34 was characterized as Escherichia coli based on morphology, biochemistry, and 16S rRNA analysis. We identified that the main antimicrobial compounds produced by E. coli GZ-34 were cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis. The two active compounds also interfered with the expression levels of some pathogenicity-contributors of R. solanacearum. Furthermore, cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) effectively inhibited spore formation of Magnaporthe grisea, which is a vital pathogenesis process of the fungal pathogen, suggesting cyclic dipeptides from E. coli are promising potential antimicrobial agents with broad-spectrum activity to kill pathogens or interfere with their pathogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: Ralstonia solanacearum; antimicrobial activity; bacterial wilt; biocontrol agent; cyclic dipeptides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29351264 PMCID: PMC6017746 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23010214
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Isolation and identification of antagonistic bacteria. (a) The disease index of plant with treatment of the antagonistic bacteria of Pantoea GZ-33, Escherichia GZ-34, and Dickeya GZ-39 against R. solanacearum. R. solanacearum and the antagonistic bacteria were used at 1:0, 1:1, 1:2.5, and 1:5 (v/v). Data are means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-test); (b) Analysis of phylogenic tree of E. coli GZ-34 based on 16S rDNA sequence. The 16S rDNA gene sequence was submitted to the NCBI website and is available with the supplied GenBank accession number MF374346.
Morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of E. coli GZ-34.
| Test | Result | Test | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cell morphology | Long rod | Gram stain | - |
| Oxidase | - | Contact enzyme | + |
| Citrate | - | V-P determination | - |
| Hydrogen sulfide | - | Lysine decarboxylase | - |
| Ornithine decarboxylase | - | Arginine dihydrolase | - |
| Nitrate | + | Starch hydrolysis | - |
| Urease | - | Lecithinase | - |
| Indole test | + | Cellobiose | - |
| Arabinose | - | Lactose | - |
| Sorbitol | + | Adonitol | - |
| Glucose | + | Maltose | + |
| Xylose | + | Trehalose | + |
| Mannitol | + | ONPG | - |
| Malonate | - | Methyl red | + |
Note: + denotes Positive, - denotes Negative.
Figure 2The inhibitory effect of E. coli GZ-34 on the cell growth of R. solanacearum in soil (a) and in plant (b). Data are means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-test).
Figure 3Influence of E. coli GZ-34 on R. solanacearum cell proliferation in the plant stem. After infection with R. solanacearum, the plant stem streamed bacterial milky liquid into sterile water without treatment with E. coli GZ-34 (a); while there was no milky liquid (b) when the plant was treated with E. coli GZ-34. Microscopy observation showed R. solanacearum cells proliferated in the plant stem in the absence of the biocontrol agent (c); but there was no detectable cells or signal in the plant in the presence of the biocontrol agent (d). Arrows pointed to R. solanacearum cells.
Figure 4Structural characterization of fraction 1. (a) ESI-MS spectra of fraction 1; (b) 1H-NMR spectra of fraction 1; (c) 13C-NMR spectra of fraction 1; (d) Structure of fraction 1 was identified as cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile).
Figure 5Structural characterization of fraction 2. (a) ESI-MS spectra of fraction 2; (b) 1H-NMR spectral of fraction 2; (c) 13C-NMR spectra of fraction 2; (d) The structure of fraction 2 was identified as cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe).
Figure 6Influence of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) on R. solanacearum. The disease index of the plant infected by R. solanacearum with treatment of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) (a) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) (b); antimicrobial activity of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) (c) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) (d) against R. solanacearum were measured. Data are means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-test).
Figure 7Effect of cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) on the spore formation of M. grisea. Growth curve (a) and spore formation (b) of M. grisea in the presence of different final concentrations of cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) as indicated. Microscopic analysis of spore formation of M. grisea with addition of cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) at a final concentration of 0 (c); 50 μM (d); 100 μM (e); and 250 μM (f). Data are means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-test).
Grading criteria of severity of R. solanacearum.
| Grade | Disease Description |
|---|---|
| DI-0 | No visible symptoms |
| DI-1 | Up to 25% of leaves wilted |
| DI-2 | 25–50% of leaves wilted |
| DI-3 | 50–75% of leaves wilted |
| DI-4 | 75–100% of leaves wilted, the plants always died |