Literature DB >> 29351163

Comparison of the Force-, Velocity-, and Power-Time Curves Between the Concentric-Only and Eccentric-Concentric Bench Press Exercises.

Alejandro Pérez-Castilla1, Paul Comfort2, John J McMahon2, Francisco L Pestaña-Melero1, Amador García-Ramos1,3.   

Abstract

Pérez-Castilla, A, Comfort, P, McMahon, JJ, Pestaña-Melero, FL, and García-Ramos, A. Comparison of the force-, velocity-, and power-time curves between the concentric-only and eccentric-concentric bench press exercises. J Strength Cond Res 34(6): 1618-1624, 2020-The aim of this study was to compare the temporal and mechanical variables between the concentric-only and eccentric-concentric bench press (BP) variants. Twenty-one men (age: 22.0 ± 4.2 years, body mass: 73.4 ± 7.7 kg, height: 177.2 ± 8.0 cm; 1 repetition maximum [1RM]: 1.12 ± 0.12 kg·kg) were evaluated during the concentric-only and eccentric-concentric BP variants using 80% 1RM. Temporal (concentric phase duration, propulsive phase duration, and time to reach the maximum values of force, velocity, and power) and mechanical variables (force, velocity, and power), determined using a linear velocity transducer, were compared between both BP variants. All temporal variables were significantly lower during the eccentric-concentric BP compared with the concentric-only BP (p ≤ 0.05; effect size [ES] range: 0.80-2.52). Maximum force as well as the mean values of velocity and power were significantly higher for the eccentric-concentric BP compared with the concentric-only BP (all p < 0.001; ES range: 2.87-3.58). However, trivial to small differences between both BP variants were observed for mean force (ES: 0.00-0.36) as well as for maximum velocity (ES: 0.40) and power (ES: 0.41). The stretch-shortening cycle (i.e., eccentric-concentric BP) mainly enhanced force production at the early portion of the concentric phase, but this potentiation effect gradually reduced over the latter part of the movement. Finally, force was higher for the concentric-only BP during 49% of the concentric phase duration. These results suggest that both BP variants should be included during resistance training programs to optimize force output at different points of the concentric phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 29351163     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  The Acute and Chronic Effects of Implementing Velocity Loss Thresholds During Resistance Training: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Critical Evaluation of the Literature.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Alejandro Pérez Castilla; Amador García Ramos; Bas Van Hooren; Michael R McGuigan; Eric R Helms
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  Acute Effects of Barbell Bouncing and External Cueing on Power Output in Bench Press Throw in Resistance-Trained Men.

Authors:  Atle Hole Saeterbakken; Jorund Loken; Tom Erik Jorung Solstad; Nicolay Stien; Olaf Prieske; Suzanne Scott; Vidar Andersen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Concentric-Only Versus Touch-and-Go Bench Press One-Repetition Maximum in Men and Women.

Authors:  Amador García-Ramos; Danica Janicijevic; Ivan Jukic
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Assessment of Back-Squat Performance at Submaximal Loads: Is the Reliability Affected by the Variable, Exercise Technique, or Repetition Criterion?

Authors:  Alejandro Pérez-Castilla; Danica Janicijevic; Zeki Akyildiz; Deniz Senturk; Amador García-Ramos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Influence of Strength Level on Performance Enhancement Using Resistance Priming.

Authors:  Takuya Nishioka; Junichi Okada
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.415

6.  Reliability of the velocity achieved during the last repetition of sets to failure and its association with the velocity of the 1-repetition maximum.

Authors:  Amador García-Ramos; Danica Janicijevic; Jorge M González-Hernández; Justin W L Keogh; Jonathon Weakley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.