Literature DB >> 29351023

Does Talking on a Cell Phone, With a Passenger, or Dialing Affect Driving Performance? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies.

Jeff K Caird, Sarah M Simmons, Katelyn Wiley, Kate A Johnston1, William J Horrey2.   

Abstract

Objective An up-to-date meta-analysis of experimental research on talking and driving is needed to provide a comprehensive, empirical, and credible basis for policy, legislation, countermeasures, and future research. Background The effects of cell, mobile, and smart phone use on driving safety continues to be a contentious societal issue. Method All available studies that measured the effects of cell phone use on driving were identified through a variety of search methods and databases. A total of 93 studies containing 106 experiments met the inclusion criteria. Coded independent variables included conversation target (handheld, hands-free, and passenger), setting (laboratory, simulation, or on road), and conversation type (natural, cognitive task, and dialing). Coded dependent variables included reaction time, stimulus detection, lane positioning, speed, headway, eye movements, and collisions. Results The overall sample had 4,382 participants, with driver ages ranging from 14 to 84 years ( M = 25.5, SD = 5.2). Conversation on a handheld or hands-free phone resulted in performance costs when compared with baseline driving for reaction time, stimulus detection, and collisions. Passenger conversation had a similar pattern of effect sizes. Dialing while driving had large performance costs for many variables. Conclusion This meta-analysis found that cell phone and passenger conversation produced moderate performance costs. Drivers minimally compensated while conversing on a cell phone by increasing headway or reducing speed. A number of additional meta-analytic questions are discussed. Application The results can be used to guide legislation, policy, countermeasures, and future research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell; dialing; driver distraction; driving performance; meta-analysis; mobile and smart phone conversation; passenger conversation; research synthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29351023     DOI: 10.1177/0018720817748145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  13 in total

1.  Patient mortality after surgery on the surgeon's birthday: observational study.

Authors:  Hirotaka Kato; Anupam B Jena; Yusuke Tsugawa
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-12-10

2.  Driving contradictions: behaviors and attitudes regarding handheld and hands-free cellphone use while driving among young drivers.

Authors:  Lucas M Neuroth; Dylan Galos; Li Li; Songzhu Zhao; Motao Zhu
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-01

3.  Does agreement mean accuracy? Evaluating glance annotation in naturalistic driving data.

Authors:  Reinier J Jansen; Sander T van der Kint; Frouke Hermens
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02

4.  The Relationship between in-Vehicle Technologies and Self-Regulation among Older Drivers.

Authors:  Austin M Svancara; Leon Villavicencio; Tara Kelley-Baker; William J Horrey; Lisa J Molnar; David W Eby; Thelma J Mielenz; Linda Hill; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; David Strogatz; Guohua Li
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-16

5.  Influence of a Cell-Phone Conversation on Balance Performance in Women with Fibromyalgia: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Santos Villafaina; Narcis Gusi; Sandra Rodriguez-Generelo; Juan de Dios Martin-Gallego; Juan Pedro Fuentes-García; Daniel Collado-Mateo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Cellphone laws and teens' calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019.

Authors:  Li Li; Caitlin N Pope; Rebecca R Andridge; Julie K Bower; Guoqing Hu; Motao Zhu
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2020-12-03

7.  Acute and Chronic Effects of Green Oat (Avena sativa) Extract on Cognitive Function and Mood during a Laboratory Stressor in Healthy Adults: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Healthy Humans.

Authors:  David O Kennedy; Bernd Bonnländer; Stefanie C Lang; Ivo Pischel; Joanne Forster; Julie Khan; Philippa A Jackson; Emma L Wightman
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  What is the difference between perceived and actual risk of distracted driving? A field study on a real highway.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Chang Wang; Rui Fu; Qinyu Sun; Hongjia Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Human factors recognition at virtual meetings and video conferencing: how to get the best performance from yourself and others.

Authors:  R S Oeppen; G Shaw; P A Brennan
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 10.  Virtual ARCP assessment and trainee feedback meetings: facilitating the best experience and practice.

Authors:  R S Oeppen; E Rutherford; P Sadler; R Isaac; P A Brennan
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 1.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.