| Literature DB >> 29350094 |
Andraz Smon1, Urh Groselj1, Marusa Debeljak1, Mojca Zerjav Tansek1, Sara Bertok1, Magdalena Avbelj Stefanija1, Katarina Trebusak Podkrajsek1,2, Tadej Battelino1,2, Barbka Repic Lampret1.
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to determine whether an expanded newborn screening programme, which is not yet available in Slovenia, would have detected the first two patients with medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency in the country. Two novel ACADM mutations are also described. Methods Both patients were diagnosed clinically; follow-up involved analysis of organic acids in urine, acylcarnitines in dried blood spots, and genetic analysis of ACADM. Cut-off values of acylcarnitines in newborns were established using analysis of 10,000 newborns in a pilot screening study. Results In both patients, analysis of the organic acids in urine showed a possible β-oxidation defect, while the specific elevation of acylcarnitines confirmed MCAD deficiency. Subsequent genetic analysis confirmed the diagnosis; both patients were compound heterozygotes, each with one novel mutation (c.861 + 2T > C and c.527_533del). The results from a retrospective analysis of newborn screening cards clearly showed major elevations of MCAD-specific acylcarnitines in the patients. Conclusions An expanded newborn screening programme would be beneficial because it would have detected MCAD deficiency in both patients before the development of clinical signs. Our study also provides one of the first descriptions of ACADM mutations in Southeast Europe.Entities:
Keywords: ACADM; MCAD deficiency; acylcarnitines; dried blood spot; mutations; neonatal screening
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29350094 PMCID: PMC6091831 DOI: 10.1177/0300060517734123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Values of C6, C8, C10, and C10:1 acylcarnitines for both patients with MCAD deficiency
| C6 (µmol/L) | C8 (µmol/L) | C10 (µmol/L) | C10:1 (µmol/L) | C8/C2 ratio | C8/C10 ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cut-off | 0.15 | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 2.30 |
| Patient 1 | 0.75 | 12.47 | 1.08 | 0.70 | 2.23 | 11.53 |
| Patient 2 | 1.24 | 6.68 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.60 | 13.28 |
The cut-off values are those used in the laboratory for patients older than 1 month. C2, acetylcarnitine; C6, hexanoylcarnitine; C8, octanoylcarnitine; C10, decanoylcarnitine; C10:1, decenoylcarnitine.
Figure 1.Comparison of acylcarnitine concentrations between healthy newborns and patients. The patients’ values for all chosen acylcarnitines were higher than those in healthy controls. The box represents the 25th and 75th percentiles, the line in the box represents the median, and the whiskers are the 1st and 99th percentiles. C6, hexanoylcarnitine; C8, octanoylcarnitine; C10, decanoylcarnitine; C10:1, decenoylcarnitine; C2, acetylcarnitine.