George Gourzoulidis1, Charalampos Tzanetakos2, Ioannis Ioannidis3, Apostolos Tsapas4, Georgia Kourlaba2, Giannis Papageorgiou5, Nikos Maniadakis6. 1. Evroston LP, Athens, Greece. gourzoulidis.g@gmail.com. 2. Evroston LP, Athens, Greece. 3. Diabetes Centre, Department of Internal Medicine, Konstantopouleio Hospital, Athens, Greece. 4. Second Medical Department, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. 5. Βoehringer Ingelheim Ηellas, Athens, Greece. 6. Department of Health Services Organization and Management, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is frequently associated with co-morbidities that exacerbate cardiovascular (CV) risk. CV disease is the leading cause of death in people with diabetes across the world and accounts for approximately half the deaths in the T2DM population. Hence, the objective of present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin, in addition to standard of care (SoC), for the treatment of adult patients with T2DM and high CV risk in Greece. METHODS: A health economic model was used to project clinical and economic outcomes of patients receiving empagliflozin plus SoC compared with those receiving SoC alone over a lifetime horizon. CV and renal event rates were derived from patient level data from the EMPA-REG-OUTCOME® trial by fitting time-dependent parametric survival functions. 5000 individual patient profiles randomly sampled from the trial were simulated using a time-to-event approach. Model extrapolated outcomes included life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Following a Greek third-party payer perspective, only direct medical costs related to drug acquisition as well as fatal and non-fatal diabetes-related complications were considered (€2016). Cost units and utility data were extracted from the literature and publicly available official sources. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of changes in input data. RESULTS: Over a patient's lifetime, empagliflozin was predicted to result in longer mean survival (14.01 LY vs. 11.87 LY with SoC) and reduced rate of clinical events accumulating 7.75 QALYs versus 6.83 QALYs on SoC alone at additional costs of €4235. The generated ICER of empagliflozin was €4633 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis confirmed empagliflozin's cost-effective profile. At the defined willingness-to-pay threshold of €34,000 per QALY gained, probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that empagliflozin was estimated to have a 100% probability of being cost-effective relative to SoC. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin added to SoC was estimated to be a highly cost-effective treatment option for the treatment of T2DM in adults with increased CV disease risk in Greece.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is frequently associated with co-morbidities that exacerbate cardiovascular (CV) risk. CV disease is the leading cause of death in people with diabetes across the world and accounts for approximately half the deaths in the T2DM population. Hence, the objective of present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin, in addition to standard of care (SoC), for the treatment of adult patients with T2DM and high CV risk in Greece. METHODS: A health economic model was used to project clinical and economic outcomes of patients receiving empagliflozin plus SoC compared with those receiving SoC alone over a lifetime horizon. CV and renal event rates were derived from patient level data from the EMPA-REG-OUTCOME® trial by fitting time-dependent parametric survival functions. 5000 individual patient profiles randomly sampled from the trial were simulated using a time-to-event approach. Model extrapolated outcomes included life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Following a Greek third-party payer perspective, only direct medical costs related to drug acquisition as well as fatal and non-fatal diabetes-related complications were considered (€2016). Cost units and utility data were extracted from the literature and publicly available official sources. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of changes in input data. RESULTS: Over a patient's lifetime, empagliflozin was predicted to result in longer mean survival (14.01 LY vs. 11.87 LY with SoC) and reduced rate of clinical events accumulating 7.75 QALYs versus 6.83 QALYs on SoC alone at additional costs of €4235. The generated ICER of empagliflozin was €4633 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis confirmed empagliflozin's cost-effective profile. At the defined willingness-to-pay threshold of €34,000 per QALY gained, probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that empagliflozin was estimated to have a 100% probability of being cost-effective relative to SoC. CONCLUSIONS:Empagliflozin added to SoC was estimated to be a highly cost-effective treatment option for the treatment of T2DM in adults with increased CV disease risk in Greece.
Authors: Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Stephen Kaptoge; David Wormser; Peter Willeit; Adam S Butterworth; Narinder Bansal; Linda M O'Keeffe; Pei Gao; Angela M Wood; Stephen Burgess; Daniel F Freitag; Lisa Pennells; Sanne A Peters; Carole L Hart; Lise Lund Håheim; Richard F Gillum; Børge G Nordestgaard; Bruce M Psaty; Bu B Yeap; Matthew W Knuiman; Paul J Nietert; Jussi Kauhanen; Jukka T Salonen; Lewis H Kuller; Leon A Simons; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Randi Selmer; Carlos J Crespo; Beatriz Rodriguez; W M Monique Verschuren; Veikko Salomaa; Kurt Svärdsudd; Pim van der Harst; Cecilia Björkelund; Lars Wilhelmsen; Robert B Wallace; Hermann Brenner; Philippe Amouyel; Elizabeth L M Barr; Hiroyasu Iso; Altan Onat; Maurizio Trevisan; Ralph B D'Agostino; Cyrus Cooper; Maryam Kavousi; Lennart Welin; Ronan Roussel; Frank B Hu; Shinichi Sato; Karina W Davidson; Barbara V Howard; Maarten J G Leening; Maarten Leening; Annika Rosengren; Marcus Dörr; Dorly J H Deeg; Stefan Kiechl; Coen D A Stehouwer; Aulikki Nissinen; Simona Giampaoli; Chiara Donfrancesco; Daan Kromhout; Jackie F Price; Annette Peters; Tom W Meade; Edoardo Casiglia; Debbie A Lawlor; John Gallacher; Dorothea Nagel; Oscar H Franco; Gerd Assmann; Gilles R Dagenais; J Wouter Jukema; Johan Sundström; Mark Woodward; Eric J Brunner; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas J Wareham; Eric A Whitsel; Inger Njølstad; Bo Hedblad; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Gunnar Engström; Wayne D Rosamond; Elizabeth Selvin; Naveed Sattar; Simon G Thompson; John Danesh Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: R Grempler; L Thomas; M Eckhardt; F Himmelsbach; A Sauer; D E Sharp; R A Bakker; M Mark; T Klein; P Eickelmann Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2011-11-13 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Wendy L Bennett; Nisa M Maruthur; Sonal Singh; Jodi B Segal; Lisa M Wilson; Ranee Chatterjee; Spyridon S Marinopoulos; Milo A Puhan; Padmini Ranasinghe; Lauren Block; Wanda K Nicholson; Susan Hutfless; Eric B Bass; Shari Bolen Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-03-14 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Julio Rosenstock; Nikolaus Marx; Steven E Kahn; Bernard Zinman; John J Kastelein; John M Lachin; Erich Bluhmki; Sanjay Patel; Odd-Erik Johansen; Hans-Jürgen Woerle Journal: Diab Vasc Dis Res Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 3.291
Authors: Bernard Zinman; Silvio E Inzucchi; John M Lachin; Christoph Wanner; Roberto Ferrari; David Fitchett; Erich Bluhmki; Stefan Hantel; Joan Kempthorne-Rawson; Jennifer Newman; Odd Erik Johansen; Hans-Juergen Woerle; Uli C Broedl Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Phil McEwan; Angharad R Morgan; Rebecca Boyce; Klas Bergenheim; Ingrid A M Gause-Nilsson; Deepak L Bhatt; Lawrence A Leiter; Peter A Johansson; Ofri Mosenzon; Avivit Cahn; John P H Wilding Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Bhavani Shankara Bagepally; Usa Chaikledkaew; Yogesh Krishnarao Gurav; Thunyarat Anothaisintawee; Sitaporn Youngkong; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Mark McEvoy; John Attia; Ammarin Thakkinstian Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2020-07