Nina-Sophie Hegemann1, Rebecca Koepple2, Franziska Walter2, David Boeckle2, Wolfgang P Fendler3, Martin Kurt Angele4, Stefan Boeck5, Claus Belka2, Falk Roeder2,6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Nina-Sophie.Hegemann@med.uni-muenchen.de. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany. 4. Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany. 5. Department of Internal Medicine III-Medical Oncology, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany. 6. CCU Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To retrospectively analyze the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. METHODS: A total of 41 patients received neoadjuvant intent chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Most patients had a locally advanced disease (T3/4: 82%, N+: 83%, M0: 100%) and squamous cell carcinoma (83%). All patients received concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil or mitomycin/5-fluorouracil. Median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy in the 25 patients who proceeded to surgery and 57.4 Gy in 16 patients who did not undergo surgery. FDG-PET/CT was used for treatment planning in 24 patients. A second FDG-PET/CT was available for response evaluation in 18 patients. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 16 months in all patients and 30 months in survivors. Radiotherapy was completed without interruptions >3 days in 90% of patients, and chemotherapy was carried out to >80% in 85% of patients. The 2‑year locoregional control rate was 60%, distant control rate 54% and overall survival rate 50%. Hematological toxicity grade 3/4 was observed in 34%/10% of patients and non-hematological toxicity grade 3/4 in 46%/2% of patients. Perioperative 30-day mortality was 4%. Subgroup analyses revealed that surgery significantly improved locoregional control (74% vs. 39%, p = 0.034), but not the 2‑year survival rate (54% vs. 43%, p = 0.246). In contrast, response based on FDG-PET/CT prior and after chemoradiation significantly predicted improved overall survival (2-year overall survival 61% vs. 40%, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Outcomes of our cohort were comparable to other series using similar treatments. Surgery significantly improved locoregional control but not survival. Response based on FDG-PET/CT predicted survival and might be used for treatment stratification.
INTRODUCTION: To retrospectively analyze the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. METHODS: A total of 41 patients received neoadjuvant intent chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Most patients had a locally advanced disease (T3/4: 82%, N+: 83%, M0: 100%) and squamous cell carcinoma (83%). All patients received concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil or mitomycin/5-fluorouracil. Median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy in the 25 patients who proceeded to surgery and 57.4 Gy in 16 patients who did not undergo surgery. FDG-PET/CT was used for treatment planning in 24 patients. A second FDG-PET/CT was available for response evaluation in 18 patients. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 16 months in all patients and 30 months in survivors. Radiotherapy was completed without interruptions >3 days in 90% of patients, and chemotherapy was carried out to >80% in 85% of patients. The 2‑year locoregional control rate was 60%, distant control rate 54% and overall survival rate 50%. Hematological toxicity grade 3/4 was observed in 34%/10% of patients and non-hematological toxicity grade 3/4 in 46%/2% of patients. Perioperative 30-day mortality was 4%. Subgroup analyses revealed that surgery significantly improved locoregional control (74% vs. 39%, p = 0.034), but not the 2‑year survival rate (54% vs. 43%, p = 0.246). In contrast, response based on FDG-PET/CT prior and after chemoradiation significantly predicted improved overall survival (2-year overall survival 61% vs. 40%, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Outcomes of our cohort were comparable to other series using similar treatments. Surgery significantly improved locoregional control but not survival. Response based on FDG-PET/CT predicted survival and might be used for treatment stratification.
Entities:
Keywords:
18F-FDG PET/CT; Chemoradiation; Esophagus cancer; Neoadjuvant; Surgery
Authors: David H Ilson; Bruce D Minsky; Geoffrey Y Ku; Valerie Rusch; Nabil Rizk; Manish Shah; David P Kelsen; Marinela Capanu; Laura Tang; Jenny Campbell; Manjit Bains Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: David P Kelsen; Katryn A Winter; Leonard L Gunderson; Joanne Mortimer; Norman C Estes; Daniel G Haller; Jaffer A Ajani; Walter Kocha; Bruce D Minsky; Jack A Roth; Christopher G Willett Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew R Davies; James A Gossage; Janine Zylstra; Fredrik Mattsson; Jesper Lagergren; Nick Maisey; Elizabeth C Smyth; David Cunningham; William H Allum; Robert C Mason Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544